Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Ngantek changed the title to 1/48 - Supermarine Seafire XVII by Airfix - rerelease Summer 2023
Posted

That’s great news. Nice box and camo schemes too. 
 

James

Posted

Great news.  However the 807 Squadron camouflage is wrong as it's meant to be extra dark sea grey, slate grey over sky. The photo they used for reference has lost the demarcation due to the filter used on the lens at the time.

 

Before any one asks. My late father was on this cruise as an airframe fitter with 807 and I had many discussions about the camouflage of the squadron aircraft with him over the years. There are other photos of the squadron at the same time available to support this.

 

Dick 

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 3
Posted

What is the significance of the white tail on SX156? (This would be my choice as RNAS Yeovilton is close to where I grew up, and I spent many happy hours there at the Air Days.)

 

Cheers,

Mark

Posted
30 minutes ago, 2996 Victor said:

What is the significance of the white tail on SX156? (This would be my choice as RNAS Yeovilton is close to where I grew up, and I spent many happy hours there at the Air Days.)

 

Cheers,

Mark

I think for exercise purposes.  (Don't quote me)🙃

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, 2996 Victor said:

What is the significance of the white tail on SX156? (This would be my choice as RNAS Yeovilton is close to where I grew up, and I spent many happy hours there at the Air Days.)

 

Cheers,

Mark

 

It was based at Yeovilton as part of a Deck Landing Control Officer Unit, I believe the white tail was that unit's identifier.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Bozothenutter said:

those rivets......🙈

I take it you mean the druze fasteners on the cowlings. 

  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, sniperUK said:

I take it you mean the druze fasteners on the cowlings. 

Dzus...but yeah.....they look....erm....interesting.

Especially with the lack of riveting anywhere else......

Posted

Smooth skins and flush rivetting versus large fasteners needing reasonable gaps - if you look at the photos they are noticeable.  How much so can be argued forever.

  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, Bozothenutter said:

Dzus...but yeah.....they look....erm....interesting.

Especially with the lack of riveting anywhere else......

 

13 minutes ago, Graham Boak said:

Smooth skins and flush rivetting versus large fasteners needing reasonable gaps - if you look at the photos they are noticeable.  How much so can be argued forever.

 

The fasteners aren't particularly inaccurate (perhaps a little overdone, but very easy to fill at least). 

 

Seafire_F_17.jpg

 

I always found the nose/fuselage a bit too fat and deep on the XVII I made, I'm sure it looks much sleeker in 1:1 scale! 

  • Like 4
Posted

I was about to post the same photo! Yeah the stained fasteners seem to stand out a lot on many photos of the 17. 

 

Still, I don't think it should be any surprise that the panel lines and surface detail are probably not quite up to today's standards for new tools. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Don't care, I want one, if only because of the wing fold :D

  • Like 3
Posted

Got one first time round - it's a nice kit. 👍

  • Like 1
Posted

You get the feeling kits like this one should simply be consistently available so it's great to see it being re released. 

Very emblematic of early 2010s Airfix I think.

  • Like 1
Posted
23 hours ago, wellsprop said:

 

Seafire_F_17.jpg

This would be my choice of markings, 1833 Sqn of the Midlands Navy reserves based at HMS Gamecock ( fromerly RAF Bramcote and now Bramcote barracks) less than 5 miles from me.

 

🇺🇦

  • Like 3
Posted
On 05/07/2023 at 17:24, wellsprop said:

 

I always found the nose/fuselage a bit too fat and deep on the XVII I made

Kit used same data as the Spitfire XII kit issued at the same time, so used poor drawings, the fuselage is too deep, not fat, it's the right width. 

Wing is slightly too far back, and has the "tamiya" wing problem, as in it too broad in centre chord.  

All fixable if you can be faffed.  I did do a load of working out of these problems on the Airfix Spitfire XII years ago.  Ironically these are the same problems the Academy XIV kits are vilified for, but they get the nose ring too big which really stands out.

One bonus is this has two wings, and the folded one can be used on on other Seafires as a free conversion kit.

  • Thanks 2
Posted (edited)

A nice kit. Built without any major difficulties. 

 

20230709-211455.jpg

 

20230709-211534.jpg

 

20230709-211646.jpg

 

V.P.

Edited by Homebee
  • Like 9
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I pre-ordered. 

Arrived today in a box that is over large....

Just 3 sprues... 2 grey, one clear. Transfers by Cartograf. 

Seems to have similarities with the FR Spitfire kit from 2018/2019 ( In the stash....)

Food underwing load of things, bit like the SeaFury...also in the stash! 

I may have to make them both!!!

 

 

 

Posted

I attempted to use the wing from this kit as a starting point to get to a Seafire III.  The wing attachment and angles were completely different than any other Airfix Spitfire kit, and especially the Airfix Mk Vb I was going to use as a base kit.  So that project is a never going to happen project.  I am hopeful that one day Airfix will do a Seafire Mk III along with a 48th scale Martlet.   I am glad to see Airfix re-issue the Seafire XVII, its a nice kit.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...