pheonix Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I expect that most of you have never heard of this machine: not surprisingly nor had I until last autumn when I came across it by accident. Having a liking for the unusual I decided that it would make a good subject for a project - the build log is in the works in progress section. The span of this model is approx 15 inches (37cm) and the length approx 8 inches (20cm) which makes it the largest scratch build that I have attempted. I am including some historical information because this is not one of the better known pioneer aircraft. The Siemens-Schuckert R. 1 Riesenflugzeug (R-plane, giant aircraft), was the product of Bruno and Franz Steffen who were engineers who had built small monoplanes at their factory near Kiel, and wanted to build a large multi-engined transport aircraft because they believed that these and not airships would be the future of air transport. In October 1914 they were able to put their ideas to the aviation inspectorate in Berlin. The appearance of Sikorsky's four-engined Grand in 1913 had had a profound effect on nascent air ministries throughout the world and while building a large airframe was straightforward, finding suitably powerful and reliable engines was an altogether different matter. The Steffen brothers' factory was too small to undertake the construction of the large project that they proposed, so Siemens-Schuckert Werke (SSW) were asked to undertake the construction. The machine was designed by the Steffen brothers and the R1 made its maiden flight on May 24 1915. It was powered by three 150 hp Benz Bz. III engines which were mounted in the nose and connected to a common gearbox. Two drive shafts were coupled to the propellors via hear housings mounted on the struts between the wings. This allowed a mechanic to be able to service the engines when in flight: communication between the pilots and the mechanic was by written notes as the noise levels were so great. The aircraft had a steel tubing framework for the fuselage, the wings were from wood, and both were covered in fabric except for the nose which was partially covered in aluminium panels. The tail wheels were steerable and the whole machine weighed 5 tons. One early recurring problem was the failure of the propellor drive shafts, usually the universal joint near the struts. This was solved by adding stiffener tubes fore and aft of the transmission shafts. The R 1 made 24 orientation flights before it was handed to the air force for further evaluation and testing. On early August 1915 the machine had just taken off on a training flight when all three engines failed causing the machine to hit the ground from about 8 meters: the crew were fortunately unharmed but the aircraft wear severely damaged. It was returned to the SSW factory and rebuilt. In the summer of 1915 a new Sonderkommando (special unit) was formed to operate with second generation giant aircraft: there was much to be learned about operating and flying these very large machines. The R1 was returned to Poland and used for further testing and training but was not considered reliable enough to be risked on actual bombing raids. It was badly damaged again inn March 1916 when being returned to Berlin when the airframe hit the side of a tunnel because the track bed had had moved. It was repaired again and sent to Doberitz as a training aircraft where it continued training pilots and flight mechanics: in 1917 it was recorded as having completed 97 training flights and 26 crew orientation flights. This machine had a longer service record than any other R type and no other centrally powered R-plane was as successful as the SSW R planes - a tribute to the Steffen brothers and their co-workers at SSW. Six more SSW R-types were built, all of them had a re-designed and better streamlined nose, with a gun position in the front. The 150 hp Benz Bz III engines of the R1 were to be replaced by more powerful 240 hp Maybach HS engines but these proved to be seriously problematical and so either Mercedes D IV or Benz IV engines were fitted. Because the Benz engines were less powerful and the Mercedes engines were heavier than the Maybach's it was decided to increase the span of the wings of some machines to increase lift. On the R VII the span reached its maximum of 38m with 6 bay wings but this caused the handling characteristics to deteriorate. The RV certainly carried out some bombing raids on the Eastern Front: the other machines were sent to the same front for training and evaluation purposes before either crashing and being written off or returning to Germany where they were used for training. These machines gave invaluable service in helping ground personnel and aircrews experience in operating large, complex aircraft from airfields in wartime conditions, and in flying multi-engined aircraft. Although their front line operations were very limited, they were nonetheless pioneers in a new branch of strategic warfare. Thanks for looking. P 20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevej60 Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 What a great looking build especially being from scratch and with the history too a great post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandy Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Another stunning build to add to your collection! That really is nice, congrats! Ian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
invidia Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 Wow. Great history lesson and a fantastic looking model. Thanks for sharing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cngaero Posted March 28, 2017 Share Posted March 28, 2017 I've never seen one of these before. What a little charmer it is. A nice potted history and a magnificent scratch build. Well done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jeaton01 Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Very nicely done, I can't believe that shaft and gearbox arrangement actually worked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWM Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Nice indeed! The WWI planes are sometime so bizzare. Some people think that delta was invented in 40s, here is delta (just tail, but...)! Cheers J-W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John_W Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Amazing build. The design looks totally bonkers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goon Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 What a fascinating design, and great model and post to portray it. Thanks for posting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 The aircraft made me laugh out loud. Really, I'm still giggling! The model, SCRATCHBUILT, made me gnash my teeth with envy of your skills. (I'm very unworthy) Thanks for sharing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerrardandrews Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Model aircraft of the month, scratch built, says it all, great historical back story as well. Brilliant looking model 😎 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russ c Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Great job on that, really nice work. Bit different from the norm too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RidgeRunner Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 She's odd looking but what a great build... and it the only scale! Martin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Epeeman Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 Well done, Pheonix - Another excellent build from your stable - really unusual subject too. Regards Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clive_t Posted March 29, 2017 Share Posted March 29, 2017 I too am a fan of unusual subjects, great modelling and very interesting background info too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pheonix Posted March 30, 2017 Author Share Posted March 30, 2017 On 28/03/2017 at 6:58 PM, jeaton01 said: Very nicely done, I can't believe that shaft and gearbox arrangement actually worked. The Germans started to build their multi-engined aircraft with the engines in the fuselage so that they could be maintained in the air by mechanics. On later aircraft such as the Zepplin Staaken the mechanics were in a cockpit in a nacelle where the engines were mounted in tandem - the mechanic sat between them! There is a photo on the net somewhere of a mechanic who is sitting at the rear of the nacelle of a Staaken where he has just fixed a faulty oil cooler! The gearbox and drive shaft arrangement caused many problems. On the SSW 1 the port (left) drive gears behind the propellor failed in flight - the aircraft suffered some damage but was able to land safely and was repaired. As a result re-inforcing bars were added to each side of the drive shafts - they are portrayed on my model. Many other early R types had this arrangement and it seems that all of them had serious problems as you suggest: hence the engines being mounted in nacelles between the wings with their mechanics. Early aero-engines were not completely reliable - a fact that in our age of super-safety and very high standards of engineering quality we tend to forget. These aircraft were true pioneers - they really were exploring the possible in the air, which is one reason why I find them so fascinating and exciting (but only too pleased that is was them and not me!) P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pheonix Posted March 30, 2017 Author Share Posted March 30, 2017 Thanks to all who have left such kind remarks. This one did have a moment when I wondered whether I had taken a step too far, but once I had solved the measurement problem all was reasonably straightforward. P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martian Posted March 30, 2017 Share Posted March 30, 2017 A truly impressive effort, I love it! Martian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now