Toryu Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 The 2024 range of groupbuilds offers a long-awaited opportunity to produce a complete series of 1/48 Curtiss Hawk biplanes thanks to a convenient bunfight outcome and a well-timed schedule. This is my very ambitious program - F6C-3 US Navy GB 11 May - 1 September P-6E Golden Age of Transport GB this groupbuild BFC-2 KUTA 19 October - 9 February Hawk III Asia GB 3 August - 24 November Step 1 ‒ The Task My subject is a P-6E flown by the squadron commander of the 36th Pursuit Squadron, 8th Pursuit Group, based at Langley Field, VA during 1936. A photo of this aircraft is published in Squadron/Signal's IN ACTION 128 but the quality is rather poor - I have two options to work with: The Classic Airframes No.444 of 2001 and the Lindberg No.72542 (not 1/72!) of 1992. Both kits are said to have some shortcomings. As we progress I will need to decide which parts are best suited respectively. One set of wings, however, needs to be reserved for my next GB entry, the F6C-3 (more soon). Here is what's in the boxes - Finally some publications that support the project - THE CURTISS ARMY HAWKS, PROFILE PUBLICATIONS NO.45, PETER M. BOWERS, LEATHERHEAD CURTISS P-6E "HAWK", SCALE AIRPLANE DRAWINGS, PAUL MATT, TEMPLE CITY, 1967 THE CURTISS HAWKS, PAGE SHAMBURGER / JOE CHRISTY, KALAMAZOO, 1972 CURTISS ARMY HAWKS, AIRCRAFT IN ACTION NO.128, LARRY DAVIS, CARROLLTON, 1992 AIR FORCE COLORS VOL.1, DANA BELL, CARROLLTON, 1995 THE OFFICIAL MONOGRAM US ARMY AIR SERVICE & AIR CORPS AIRCRAFT COLOR GUIDE VOL.1, ARCHER, STURBRIDGE, 1995 WINGS OF STARS - US ARMY AIR CORPS 1919-1941, PETER FREEMAN / MIKE STARMER, ARLINGTON, 2009 Step 2 ‒ Fuselage Classic Airframes are short-run kits and, as experience shows, quite vicious builds. No difference here. There are a number of positives like their singularity, super-fine panel lines and excellent resin parts, but also dimension issues, missing detail, soft plastic and - worst of all - no positioning pins anywhere, which is particularly bad in the case of biplanes. Some of these inconsistencies are reflected in my fuselage modifications - These are small improvements, the big blunder, however, is the wing root which is too far forward by 4 mm. Since the bottom wing determines the position of the upper plane this error would affect the overall outcome. I therefore cut and inserted the Lindberg wing root in the correct place. An easier wing installation via slot and pin is a worthwhile side effect. Step 3 ‒ Cockpit The kit's resin cockpit is neatly done but the sidewall frames are not reproduced correctly. Some scratch work was necessary. The embossed instrument panel was reversed in order to facilitate dial decals on the flat side. When dry-fitted everything matched properly - Before fixing the cockpit and merging the fuselage halves I drilled rigging holes and inserted wires, exhausts and the radiator. The rear deck was closed and the sternpost extended by 2 mm (too short!). Finally, I added some more detail - Although two oil cooler scoops are provided by the kit (plastic and resin!) I scratch-built one because neither was deep enough. A further departure is the Lindberg vertical tail (plugged-on here for test purposes) which has a more accurate shape and better articulated rips. Step 4 ‒ A host of pins The regrettable lack of adjustment pins demands some makeshift solution. Several metal pins and corresponding holes were worked in to support weak connections (see red circles). The wheel housing arches had to be reamed because their own wheels wouldn't fit (!), and axles were added for the wheels to be rotatable to a flattened seat lateron. Instead of using either of the P-6E wings I cannibalised the lower surfaces from the Lindberg F11C kit that I held in reserve. They match the new centre section (see step 2) much better. Next, all components were primed - grey underneath blue areas and white for yellow areas. Step 5 ‒ Wings For the main wing I reverted to Lindberg P-6E parts to match the deeper ribs of the lower surfaces even though they may look a bit overdone. The integrated pin holes for the struts are of advantage, too. The unused Classic Airframes wing will then aggravate my future F6C build 🙄. The wing planform needed to be trimmed at the tips. Then I braced the lower part with a strip of fiber since the topside will be added only when the rigging is complete, and I don’t want to risk any wing bending. Before priming I amended both wing halves with some more detail. 21 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zigomar Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 That's a typical woke GB!😂, I will seriously follow your progresses with pleasure! Schusssss 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2996 Victor Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Lovely selection of subjects - looking forward to seeing these develop! Cheers, Mark 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CliffB Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Lovely Hawks. Good luck with your project 👍 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Ooh, nice subject series Michael, that you have one planned for the Asia GB as well gains my full approval 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mjwomack Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 7 hours ago, Toryu said: BFC-2 KUTA 19 October - 9 February Very organised to have something allocated to KUTA already! Seriously though I think it's a very clever approach and a good use of the KUTA wildcard 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toryu Posted March 13 Author Share Posted March 13 1 hour ago, Mjwomack said: a good use of the KUTA wildcard Thank you Mr. Womack. Incidentally, I built this BFC-2 already in 1996 but it needs to be taken apart for a 200 hours overhaul - very apt for the KUTA. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corsairfoxfouruncle Posted March 13 Share Posted March 13 Welcome aboard with some of my favorite interwar aircraft. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 Are these all to be in the Gentleman's scale, Sir? It's a great project. I've items in mind for the Navy and Asia GBs, and might choose a Hawk III in the latter myself. James Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toryu Posted March 17 Author Share Posted March 17 1 hour ago, Old Man said: Are these all to be in the Gentleman's scale, Sir? All 1/48, James, and all with some or other improvement due to their limited origin. A Hawk III for the Asia GB? I take up the gauntlet… 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Masters Posted March 17 Share Posted March 17 Nice selection. Some of my favourites! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Man Posted March 19 Share Posted March 19 On 3/16/2024 at 11:43 PM, Toryu said: All 1/48, James, and all with some or other improvement due to their limited origin. A Hawk III for the Asia GB? I take up the gauntlet… Perhaps another gauntlet, Sir? I've got two for the Asia build in mind, and will have to decide. One is a Finemolds Nakajima A2N Type 90 Carrier Fighter. Flying off the Kaga at Shanghai, these were the first Japanese fighters the Hawk III encountered. One is an old MPM original Hawk III, which I would do by kit decals as one flown by Tommy Walker, a mercenary pilot whose exploits, real or fabulous, form much of the account of air fighting over China in Martin Caiden's 'The Ragged, Rugged Warriors'. Either would make a nice pairing.... James 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toryu Posted March 19 Author Share Posted March 19 5 hours ago, Old Man said: One is a Finemolds Nakajima A2N Type 90 Carrier Fighter. Well, I‘ve got the 1/48 ABK Models Nakajima A2N, but that‘s one kit too many for this year, I‘m afraid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin W Posted March 22 Share Posted March 22 A great theme and a good idea to join several group builds together. I very thought about it but never managed to. I built the Classic Airframes Hawk 111 in Thai markings a few years ago and it was challenging. Good luck with these 4 and I look forward to seeing them through the year. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toryu Posted March 22 Author Share Posted March 22 Step 1 ‒ The Task see first post at the top. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevej60 Posted March 26 Share Posted March 26 Great subjects and great schemes too! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toryu Posted March 29 Author Share Posted March 29 Step 2 ‒ Fuselage see first post at the top. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toryu Posted April 5 Author Share Posted April 5 Step 3 ‒ Cockpit see first post at the top. 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toryu Posted April 12 Author Share Posted April 12 Step 4 ‒ A host of pins see first post at the top. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corsairfoxfouruncle Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 Wow this is really taking shape ! I wish I coild get this good at Bi-planes, I have a WNW Albatros V/Va and an Williams brothers F9C Sparrowhawk that are just begging to be built. Links ate too the specific versions I have. https://www.scalemates.com/kits/wingnut-wings-32907-albatros-dva--1249032 https://www.scalemates.com/kits/williams-brothers-32590-f9c-sparrowhawk--1087633 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toryu Posted April 12 Author Share Posted April 12 Nice models Dennis @Corsairfoxfouruncle The F9C in particular. There is no 1/48 kit afaik, maybe a vacuform? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corsairfoxfouruncle Posted April 12 Share Posted April 12 2 minutes ago, Toryu said: Nice models Dennis @Corsairfoxfouruncle The F9C in particular. There is no 1/48 kit afaik, maybe a vacuform? I agree I looked around forever to find one in 1/48 or 1/72. Finally found the 1/32 kit and figured it was small enough to fit in with my other kits. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toryu Posted April 19 Author Share Posted April 19 Step 5 ‒ Wings see first post at the top 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toryu Posted Friday at 12:41 Author Share Posted Friday at 12:41 Army Air Corps colours of the period are tricky. Flying surfaces were painted Yellow No.4. In July 1934 Light Blue No.23 replaced olive drab on all other surfaces of operational aircraft but a sedate transition period was admitted for economical reasons so that it is often difficult to assess which fuselage colour is shown on a b/w photo. As I want my Hawk to display this colour combination I chose an aircraft that left no doubt. Research of contemporary colours was conducted by Dana Bell and by Robert Archer (see references). While the strongly saturated orange-yellow chroma of No.4 is well represented by Tamiya TS 34 'Camel Yellow', Light Blue No.23 is a different and controversial story. It's often described as blue-grey with a distinct turquoise undertone. Archer's 'Monogram Color Guide' includes a paint chip which I took as guideline. Since none of the commercial paints came close to the colour sample I finally settled with Citadel Colour 'Ahriman Blue' which I blended with 50% medium grey and tested on a paint mule (see above). The fuselage (again with the tail plugged on) could now receive its principal colour coat. 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tommy Liu Posted Friday at 18:17 Share Posted Friday at 18:17 5 hours ago, Toryu said: Army Air Corps colours of the period are tricky. Flying surfaces were painted Yellow No.4. In July 1934 Light Blue No.23 replaced olive drab on all other surfaces of operational aircraft but a sedate transition period was admitted for economical reasons so that it is often difficult to assess which fuselage colour is shown on a b/w photo. As I want my Hawk to display this colour combination I chose an aircraft that left no doubt. The most thorough research of contemporary colours was conducted by Dana Bell and by Robert Archer (see references). While the strongly saturated orange-yellow chroma of No.4 is well represented by Tamiya TS 34 'Camel Yellow', Light Blue No.23 is a different and controversial story. It's often described as blue-grey with a distinct turquoise undertone. Archer's 'Monogram Color Guide' includes a paint chip which I took as guideline. None of the commercial paints came even close to the colour sample until I discovered Citadel Colour 'Ahriman Blue' which I blended with 50% medium grey and tested on a paint mule (see above). The fuselage (again with the tail plugged on) could now receive its principal colour coat. Great job! This typical 1930's USAAF camouflage reminds me of the A-12 Shrike, Martin B-10 and Boeing P-26. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now