-
Posts
3,061 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
MikeR last won the day on October 6 2017
MikeR had the most liked content!
About MikeR
Profile Information
-
Gender
Male
-
Location
Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
-
Interests
Many and varied!
Recent Profile Visitors
6,984 profile views
MikeR's Achievements
Very Obsessed Member (5/9)
2.1k
Reputation
-
Currently reading this new release from Helion and Company: First heard about this campaign when I was reading the Bolitho series book "Command a King's Ship" by Alexander Kent/Douglas Reeman when I was teenager. Apparently both Suffren and Hughes were, er.... big lads who liked their food! Mike.
-
U.S.S. Ward DD-139 (1/350 by Black Cat)
MikeR replied to Faraway's topic in Work in Progress - Maritime
A German modeller did the same thing with the 1/700 Flyhawk kit not long after the kit was released: LINK. The article is in German, but gives a rough idea of what he did. Mike. -
Romulan Warbird -- AMT 1/3200
MikeR replied to opus999's topic in Ready for Inspection - SF & RealSpace
Nicely done! If I remember correctly, this was originally issued by AMT as part of a three piece adversary set along with a Klingon Bird of Prey and a Ferengi Marauder. Never bought that one, but I did have the ToS, TMP and TNG Enterprise set. Mike. -
The price difference was a major facter in my decision to "curb my enthusiasm" and wait for the SH kit! I still went ahead and bought a MV IIIB as I wanted a two seater, though. Not sure I want to try and graft the MV IIIB nose onto an SH kit, so I'll just have to live with any visual dissonance between the two kits! Mike.
- 502 replies
-
- 1
-
- MIII
- Special Hobby
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
It's possible the release of the Modelsvit kit might have had an impact. As the IIIC/B only had a maximum of four users, unless your building an example of every unit that operated the type, most people would, I suspect, only buy one or two kits at most. I'll be honest, if I had purchased the Modelsvit IIICJ beforehand, I wouldn't have bought the Special Hobby example I did. Mike.
- 502 replies
-
- MIII
- Special Hobby
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Profile Morskie did books on the Baltimore, Nashville, Savannah and Helena. The first three all being late war fits whilst Helena was "as sunk". As it's fairly evident Trumpeter use the Morskies as a basis for their kits, it'll be one of those four.
-
Finally managed to get a copy of this courtesy of a secondhand book seller in Norwich via Amazon, a mere 18 years after it's publication! From Hannants, one of these: Mike.
-
I'd need at least two. The RAF SEAC one here and a RAAF New Guinea based example!
-
The only certainty will be that whatever Eduard releases will delight some and disappoint others. A new 1/72 MiG-21Bis would be welcome, but a WW2 type it isn't and I suspect that's where the really big bucks lie. So a WW2 type is a reasonable guess.
-
Another thing to add is currency fluctuations. Most of the Chinese produced kits were very cheap in relative terms to start off with, now they're very expensive. An arguably overvalued Chinese currency versus a weak UK pound means I have to very choosy about which kits I choose to buy. I'd rather like one of the new Vee Hobby 1/700 USS Cleveland kits or the Flyhawk Matapan period HMS Formidable in the same scale, but they're both waaaaay too expensive. Mike.
-
Questions about Capital Ships of the 1930’s.
MikeR replied to Corsairfoxfouruncle's topic in Maritime WWI to 1939
I can't really help with the paints, but I can for kit recommendations. For the Texas, there's the Trumpeter kit, but it's her late war fit festooned with AA guns, so backdating it would be a substantial undertaking. You'd probably need to replace the main deck completely rather than try to remove all the gun tubs. Arizona has the Dragon kit, but it hasn't been released for while and might be hard to find. IIRC, there's a HobbyBoss kit as well but it's on the basic side. Flyhawk have done the Iron Duke in her WW1 fit, but it's "arm and a leg expensive". Trumpeter have done a 1931 boxing of the Hood with an aircraft catapult on the quarterdeck, shouldn't be too difficult to get, I would think. Finally, the Royal Oak has only been done in resin, by WSW and Orange Hobby. Both are in her as-lost in 1939 condition, so would also need backdating. Hope that helps, Mike. -
I was thinking along the lines of potential top weight issues, particularly once you get radar fitted. The only reason for York's high bridge was a requirement to clear a catapult fitted atop B turret, which was never designed, let alone built. Once that requirement was scrapped, Exeter was modified accordingly whilst on the stocks, York being too far advanced. Mike.
-
CSS Alabama. Would like to see a new kit.
MikeR replied to Noel Smith's topic in Historic Vessels to 1914
Some subjects are always more emotive than others, rightly or wrongly. Besides, with Simon Kohler in charge Hornby/Airfix are aiming for the British-centric nostalgia market, the Alabama doesn't fit that. Not that maritime subjects are a strong point for Airfix at the moment. That may change, of course. Mike. -
Hi peeps, I've recently acquired the new 1/700 Trumpeter kit of the HMS York and, although I'll be building her in her final fit, I've had a random thought: If we assume that her damage from Suda Bay was nowhere near as bad as it was in real life, what modifications would have been done to her if she'd returned to the UK? I can think of the following: 1. Twin 4 inch replacing the singles. 2. A pair of octuple Pompoms being fitted, most likely aft of the bridge where there's room for them. 3. Possible changes to the torpedo mounts as per her half-sister Exeter. 4. Radar fitted, perhaps a search radar replacing the catapult and Walrus in addition to the likely gunnery sets. 5. Lastly, here's the biggie: alterations to her bridge as I believe there were plans to lower it as early as 1937. I'm particularly intrigued as to what the last likely mod would've entailed. A cut and shut of the existing structure or something completely new? Anyone any thoughts or ideas? Mike.