Troy Smith Posted October 31, 2020 Share Posted October 31, 2020 1 hour ago, StevSmar said: I was thinking of a (colour) photo showing a tatty FAA Hurricane that showed equally bad flaking, if I come across it I'll post it. Hawker Sea Hurricane Mk.1a by Etienne du Plessis, on Flickr Despite it being captioned frequently as a Sea Hurricane, it's just an old Mk.I in Naval Training unit, given the freshness of the fuselage roundel, mid 1942 or maybe even later. So poor old P3090 has been knocking about for 2 years Air Britain - P3090, 242, to Admiralty 4.41 PS note also the 3 different spinner types fitted http://armahobbynews.pl/en/blog/2019/06/25/hawker-hurricane-mk-i-navalised-versions/ Hawker Hurricane Mk I, P3090/W-8E, 760 Squadron FAA, part of the Naval Air Fighter School based at RNAS Yeovilton, Summer 1942. Pics from our own @tonyot HTH 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevSmar Posted November 1, 2020 Share Posted November 1, 2020 22 hours ago, Troy Smith said: 1) Hawker Sea Hurricane Mk.1a by Etienne du Plessis, on Flickr...Air Britain - P3090, 242, to Admiralty 4.41... 2) ...note also the 3 different spinners fitted... 3) http://armahobbynews.pl/en/blog/2019/06/25/hawker-hurricane-mk-i-navalised-versions/ Hawker Hurricane Mk I, P3090/W-8E, 760 Squadron FAA, part of the Naval Air Fighter School based at RNAS Yeovilton, Summer 1942... 1) That was the photo I was thinking of. 2) That is a great photo showing the three spinners in on shot. 3) Nice article by @tonyot! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevSmar Posted November 4, 2020 Share Posted November 4, 2020 Just had a book called “Polish Fighter Colours 1939-1947” show up and it has 45 pages dedicated to the Hurricane. I’m pleased I’ve added it to my collection. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigos Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 This is the most exceptionally painted Hurricane I knew. It is the only one that has the bottom surfaces painted in two colors. I suspect it is the result of experiments carried out in May/June 1941 in 56th Squadron. Among the boring and repetitive camouflages that Hurricane wore, it is simply unique. Unfortunately I do not have any other photo showing code letters or serial number. The code letter looks like S or J. If only I had those missing elements, I would definitely like to build such a painted model of Arma Hobby. Will you help to write its story? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Boak Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 Very interesting indeed, although it does seem that the uppersurface wraps around the leading edge rather than covers the whole of the undersurface. Still a very odd appearance, with the light colour wrapping round but not the darker, the underside dark but not the wheel door, and a very high contrast on the uppersurface. The spinner suggests a Mk.IIA or very late Mk.I, so it may be an early application of the Intruder scheme with Medium Sea Grey over TLS with a Night underside - but that doesn't explain the u/c door nor what appears to be a light (Sky) colour under the centre-section and radiator. Is this a repaired aircraft at an MU awaiting full repaint? Or a hybrid in the hands of trainees? I have seen a Mk.IIB with such a high contrast, at a time when the unit was carrying out some night intruder missions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V Line Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 The aircraft appears to be a Mk IIb. Note the mg fairing visible below the aircrafstman on the far right. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Boak Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 Not however a standard Mk.II tailwheel. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigos Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 6 minutes ago, Graham Boak said: Not however a standard Mk.II tailwheel. This is a standard tailwheel from the first months of Mk.II production. I could already give a picture with changed contrast in the first post. 2 hours ago, Graham Boak said: Very interesting indeed, although it does seem that the uppersurface wraps around the leading edge rather than covers the whole of the undersurface. Still a very odd appearance, with the light colour wrapping round but not the darker, the underside dark but not the wheel door, and a very high contrast on the uppersurface. The spinner suggests a Mk.IIA or very late Mk.I, so it may be an early application of the Intruder scheme with Medium Sea Grey over TLS with a Night underside - but that doesn't explain the u/c door nor what appears to be a light (Sky) colour under the centre-section and radiator. Is this a repaired aircraft at an MU awaiting full repaint? Or a hybrid in the hands of trainees? I have seen a Mk.IIB with such a high contrast, at a time when the unit was carrying out some night intruder missions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Boak Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 But the first production Mk.IIs were Mk.IIA. So a Mk.IIB with this would be rare. That it lacks the underwing fairing may suggest that it is indeed an earIy Mk.IIB. However, I didn't ask for a photo with increased contrast, I was referring the the contrast between the two uppersurface colours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Fleming Posted November 22, 2020 Share Posted November 22, 2020 The tones do seem to match the descriptions of the schemes applied to the 56 aircraft that took part in the colour trials, the later ones where a 'dark grey' replaced Sky blue on the underside 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevSmar Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 On 9/20/2020 at 5:28 PM, Troy Smith said: ... KZ191, no. I don't think so. Photos i posted show parts to be be green-ish. AFAIK, Alumium paint does not go green with age. and it spent years outside, on a dump, in the middle east... ...Yes. But Aluminum dope pretty much always shows up with a shiny sheen, whatever the film. Grey Green looks matt. I spoke with the owner of KZ191, he advised that the fuselage framework is painted silver. I was hoping to talk to a curator at the National Air and Space Museum to see about getting a few more photos of the cockpit of their Hurricane, unfortunately it will have to wait until they open up again after COVID-19 settles down a bit in their location. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevSmar Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 I spoke with the author of an upcoming book on the RCAF and in his draft he has the following statement with respect to the RCAF's early Hurricanes: "On 27th of October 1940, number 1 squadron RCAF requested permission to buy locally 5-gallons each of dark earth and dark green "camouflage paint"". This highlights how although there were likely "official" formulations of paint, local sources would be used if required and these paint supplies would not be the same colour as the "official" colour. They might be close in particular conditions, but they won't look close under all light sources and photographic technologies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevSmar Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 There’s a nice article in the January 2021 edition of Finescale Modeller called 44 Shades of Olive Drab, by Danielle Righi. It provides an interesting overview of how one colour, Olive Drab, can have many different shades depending on who produced it and weathering. (Seeing this article reminded me of the 50 Shades of Silver...) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zigster Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 Why there is an extended entry step (in flight) on BE above? Malfunction? Zig Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Boak Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 Well spotted. Possibly fixed down/left down to avoid unnecessary work? Does it return automatically or does it have to be manually restowed before flight? Basically, at this stage of its life and role who would care? One of the other aircraft in the formation is similarly showing its step. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alt-92 Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 29 minutes ago, Graham Boak said: Possibly fixed down/left down to avoid unnecessary work? ISTR it's linked to the hand-hold, which is also folded inwards. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crimea River Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 Yes, both are linked and the step is spring loaded. There's a release in the cockpit that the pilot controls to retract the step and close the hand hold. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Work In Progress Posted November 28, 2020 Share Posted November 28, 2020 It is a notoriously fragile mechanism though so no real surprise if it's bust on an older second-line airframe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StevSmar Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Is this a metal wing on the prototype slip wing Hurricane? I’m also intrigued with what the fitting is in front of the outboard edge of the Port flap? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tango98 Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Hi Steve, The Hurri in question was AG321 that arrived for the trials with fabric wings but were exchanged for metal ones. I'll send you my complete file on the slip wing project via WeTransfer shortly. Cheers Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogsbody Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 3 hours ago, tango98 said: Hi Steve, The Hurri in question was AG321 that arrived for the trials with fabric wings but were exchanged for metal ones. I'll send you my complete file on the slip wing project via WeTransfer shortly. Cheers Dave Not AG321. It's just # 321, one of the 20 fabric-winged Hurricanes bought by the RCAF in 1939 and then sent back to Britain, in 1940, with No.1 (F) RCAF. Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tango98 Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Hi Chris, Yes, I'm aware of the Canadian connection for 321 (L1884) but in all of my files on the slip wing project it is consistently referred to as AG321 save in one instance in a letter from the RTO at Hawkers to F.Hills & Sons on 12 March 1943 where it is identified as Hurricane Mk.1 aircraft No.321. Cheers Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogsbody Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 1 hour ago, tango98 said: Hi Chris, Yes, I'm aware of the Canadian connection for 321 (L1884) but in all of my files on the slip wing project it is consistently referred to as AG321 save in one instance in a letter from the RTO at Hawkers to F.Hills & Sons on 12 March 1943 where it is identified as Hurricane Mk.1 aircraft No.321. Cheers Dave In what little I have read of the slip-wing, I have never read of the AG321 serial number. It's just 321. But then, I haven't done any real research into that subject. Chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl V Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 1. At least one photo shows the fuselage serial as 321 without a trace of an AG. 2. Here is the service history of 321. I got the UK portion from an Air Britain article, I believe by Phil Butler although I cannot be certain. 321 TOS 22/05/39 3 RD Jericho Beach (storage) 22/05/39; CCF (winterization trials aircraft) 20/02/40; to Halifax for shipment overseas 25/05/40. Shipped overseas late May 1940. 13 Mu 23/06/40; 1(F) RCAF 03/07/40, 6 OTU 03/07/40; 7 OTU 04/07/40; 5 OTU 13/08/40; 48 MU 02/06/41; 8 FTS 17/07/41; Hawkers R1W 11/10/41; RAE Farnborough 30/01/42; F. Hills & Sons 13/04/42; Cat B MR 16/13/44; AW/CN 30/05/44. Presumed SOS 21/06/47. 3. Now, as far as AG321 is concerned, I have reasonably good information on its early career. In December 1941 it was reported as being one of 60 Hurricanes in storage at Canadian Car & Foundry awaiting engines. At that point, the RCAF was desperate for fighters having its Kittyhawk deliveries preempted by the US and an arrangement was made with the UK to have all 60 of these aircraft transferred to the RCAF (Program 36) which service would be responsible for providing engines etc. etc. etc. these aircraft were randomly renumbered in the RCAF serial series 1351 to 1410. AG321 was allotted RCAF serials 1404. However, before delivery, sometime in January, ACM Portal visited Canada and persuaded the RCAF to reduce Program 36 from 60 to 30. As a result, AG321, some time presumably in early 1942, ended up with the RAF (though I sincerely doubt with fabric wings). Air Arsenal North America notes it as being transferred to Russia. 4. My guess is simply that the people concerned were incapable of comprehending the fact of an RCAF serial number and pulled the AG prefix out of some kind of fantasy hat. Carl 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl V Posted November 29, 2020 Share Posted November 29, 2020 Somehow the beginning of my posting got left out. Regarding the question of whether the slip-wing Hurricane was RCAF serial 321 or RAF serial AG321, I pass on the following thoughts, for what they may be worth. 1. At least one photo shows the fuselage serial as 321 without a trace of an AG. 2. Here is the service history of 321. I got the UK portion from an Air Britain article, I believe by Phil Butler although I cannot be certain. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now