Jump to content

MikeR

Gold Member
  • Posts

    3,062
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

MikeR last won the day on October 6 2017

MikeR had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About MikeR

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Aberdeen, Scotland, UK
  • Interests
    Many and varied!

Recent Profile Visitors

7,033 profile views

MikeR's Achievements

Very Obsessed Member

Very Obsessed Member (5/9)

2.1k

Reputation

  1. As Ray_W's posted, as decals, they're excellent with good colour registration and density, even if some details can be incorrect. They're also thin with great adhesion, so don't try to move them around too much as things like serials will curl back on themselves if you aren't careful. Place them onto the model as close to their final position as possible and work from there. Mike.
  2. Could be one of the production team was a modeller. Nice that they included it. Mike.
  3. Sorry to be "that guy"() but the Fletcher was a "Round Bridge" unit whilst the Sullivans was a "Square Bridge" one, so it would be the USS Cushing boxing you'd need. Navsource is a great site for anything US Navy related with a massive selection of photographs. ModelWarships.com also has a 105 page megathread on the class with loads of excellent photos too. Mike.
  4. Currently reading this new release from Helion and Company: First heard about this campaign when I was reading the Bolitho series book "Command a King's Ship" by Alexander Kent/Douglas Reeman when I was teenager. Apparently both Suffren and Hughes were, er.... big lads who liked their food! Mike.
  5. A German modeller did the same thing with the 1/700 Flyhawk kit not long after the kit was released: LINK. The article is in German, but gives a rough idea of what he did. Mike.
  6. Nicely done! If I remember correctly, this was originally issued by AMT as part of a three piece adversary set along with a Klingon Bird of Prey and a Ferengi Marauder. Never bought that one, but I did have the ToS, TMP and TNG Enterprise set. Mike.
  7. The price difference was a major facter in my decision to "curb my enthusiasm" and wait for the SH kit! I still went ahead and bought a MV IIIB as I wanted a two seater, though. Not sure I want to try and graft the MV IIIB nose onto an SH kit, so I'll just have to live with any visual dissonance between the two kits! Mike.
  8. It's possible the release of the Modelsvit kit might have had an impact. As the IIIC/B only had a maximum of four users, unless your building an example of every unit that operated the type, most people would, I suspect, only buy one or two kits at most. I'll be honest, if I had purchased the Modelsvit IIICJ beforehand, I wouldn't have bought the Special Hobby example I did. Mike.
  9. Very nice indeed! I have both the Kajika and Fujimi kits of Hiei as an "Alpha and Omega" comparison, but I'm very tempted to built the Kajika as per the photo Melchie posted. The intermediate period between the original tripod and the full pagoda configurations is fascinating. Mike.
  10. Profile Morskie did books on the Baltimore, Nashville, Savannah and Helena. The first three all being late war fits whilst Helena was "as sunk". As it's fairly evident Trumpeter use the Morskies as a basis for their kits, it'll be one of those four.
  11. Finally managed to get a copy of this courtesy of a secondhand book seller in Norwich via Amazon, a mere 18 years after it's publication! From Hannants, one of these: Mike.
  12. I'd need at least two. The RAF SEAC one here and a RAAF New Guinea based example!
  13. The only certainty will be that whatever Eduard releases will delight some and disappoint others. A new 1/72 MiG-21Bis would be welcome, but a WW2 type it isn't and I suspect that's where the really big bucks lie. So a WW2 type is a reasonable guess.
  14. Another thing to add is currency fluctuations. Most of the Chinese produced kits were very cheap in relative terms to start off with, now they're very expensive. An arguably overvalued Chinese currency versus a weak UK pound means I have to very choosy about which kits I choose to buy. I'd rather like one of the new Vee Hobby 1/700 USS Cleveland kits or the Flyhawk Matapan period HMS Formidable in the same scale, but they're both waaaaay too expensive. Mike.
  15. I can't really help with the paints, but I can for kit recommendations. For the Texas, there's the Trumpeter kit, but it's her late war fit festooned with AA guns, so backdating it would be a substantial undertaking. You'd probably need to replace the main deck completely rather than try to remove all the gun tubs. Arizona has the Dragon kit, but it hasn't been released for while and might be hard to find. IIRC, there's a HobbyBoss kit as well but it's on the basic side. Flyhawk have done the Iron Duke in her WW1 fit, but it's "arm and a leg expensive". Trumpeter have done a 1931 boxing of the Hood with an aircraft catapult on the quarterdeck, shouldn't be too difficult to get, I would think. Finally, the Royal Oak has only been done in resin, by WSW and Orange Hobby. Both are in her as-lost in 1939 condition, so would also need backdating. Hope that helps, Mike.
×
×
  • Create New...