Jump to content
This site uses cookies! Learn More

This site uses cookies!

You can find a list of those cookies here: mysite.com/cookies

By continuing to use this site, you agree to allow us to store cookies on your computer. :)

Josip

Members
  • Content count

    294
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

401 Excellent

About Josip

  • Rank
    Established Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Slovenia

Recent Profile Visitors

1,067 profile views
  1. Its very rare to se a SAF bird. The model itself is pretty good, but there are a couple of visible flaws that need rectifying. - a very noticable canopy seam - misaligned tail guns Josip
  2. Unfortunately there is one thing that just isn't up to the rest of the very convincing setup and that is the aeroplane. I'd definitely replace it with a more up to date kit like Hasegawa 1:72 B-26. Josip
  3. I'll stay with 1:72, but will definitely buy the ICM kit because I prefer it to Airfix. Its an impresive model. Its also nice to see machine guns in proper thickness for the scale.
  4. One more thing. It looks like Revell and Academy kits aren't really the same. But I'd go for Revell any time because their decals are far superior.
  5. Flight of the Phoenix

    This is superb! Who would have thought to see it done in plastic!?! But...change that board with real sand. It'll change the whole thing for the better. Josip
  6. My favourite Japanese bomber. I like it a lot. Especially the demarcation between camouflage colours.
  7. Thank you all. I'm glad that you like it. As for the other builds I rate the B-25 and MiG 21 far superior models. And they've been posted here before, but the ammount of daily quality models here is such that one gets inevitably forgotten in a few days. Josip
  8. Tu-114

    You should definitely not be ashamed of it!!! Josip
  9. Revell's 1/32 Typhoon MkIb

    Could you please explain the unpainted/white paneling on the fuselage? Josip
  10. USAF must have been thoroughly impressed by sporadic successes of Luftwaffe jets using unguided rockets against US heavy bombers in closing days of WW2. Otherwise they would have never developed this monstrosity! Luckily for us the Cold war never turned to Nuclear one and Scorpions never had to engage Soviet TU-95s over the Arctic, where the majority of F-89s spent their careers. I’ve never considered Soviet leadership to be so dumb to send unescorted fleets of heavy bombers with nuclear bombloads across the Artic only to be shot down with unguided, guided and nuclear air to air rockets by radar guided F-89s, but apparently the USAF brass thought differently. Anyhoo, the Revell/Academy kit rates about 3/5 in my book and I definitely won’t be building another one in this life. It looks OK in the box, but if one really wants it to shine, one should invest in Pavla’s cockpit and canopy upgrade set. This one was done mostly OOB with some minor additional work. Its quite a survivor this one as it nearly ended in trash not once, but twice! Luckily for us Revell’s customer service is great and I got additional parts mailed pretty soon. And here it stands! Red was airbrushed with Revell acrylics and metal was dry brushed with Model Master metalizers of various shades. Just for the sake of comparison I’ve placed some of my other models in order to easily comprehend the size difference between them. And they called it a fighter!?! Josip
  11. A sincere thank you for the model and an explanation about Toucan differences.
  12. What a nice model! Those Hasegawa 1:72 WW2 kits really make wonderful models. There's a lot that I like and some things that I'd do different. I'd put a gun in the nose - it looks more interesting. I wouldn't fade the Olive drab so much and I wouldn't go so far on chipping effect. I'd leave the upper turret unpainted as they were i reality. Otherwise its wonderful and more detailed than 1:48 Monogram kit.
  13. This isn't a comment about your model but a critic to Revell. A kit that needs so much resin parts to improve its deficiences is a BAD kit in my book! That's why I'll avoid their line of 1:32 109s. Cheers, Josip
  14. My problem with Eduard kit was that I have intended from the start to build it in closed form. The Eduard kit however is ment to be displayed open and some care and hard work is involved to saw off the top of the engine block and get pieces of cowling to blend in. The aft part of the canopy wouldn't fit without sanding and both wing radiators needed puttying and I have botched it. To put it short, I 'd be more happy with Tamiya kit. Josip
  15. I don't think so as their performances differed and they were also in different units. The 109s were the best machines and as such were stationed mostly in the vicinity of Belgrade, while Hurricanes covered other sectors. Most of them saw very limited action ast they were deliberately sent to patrol the areas without enemy activity. The only surviving Hurricane was later repainted in Regia Aeronautica markings and flown to Italy.
×