Jump to content

Neil Lambess

Members
  • Posts

    219
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    New zealand

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Neil Lambess's Achievements

Established Member

Established Member (3/9)

539

Reputation

  1. Hope it's based on the Ginter plans and not anigrands er "interpretation " with the 18mm too shallow fuselage depth...
  2. Thanks for the sprue shots .....doesn't look too bad so far
  3. Yes it's staggering how wrong the shapes are /yet it still looks like an HL 10. On my kit I've done massive amounts of sanding to restore the curved feel . (The resin is thick enough) fixing the fin shape is worth doing to improve the look ....don't get me started on the anigrand xb 51 tho ...it's worse
  4. Don't forget to reshape the fins on the HL 10 as they are not even remotely accurate ...:(
  5. You forgot the FW 190 and Little Nellie /Wallis autogyro (the first of the 124th flyers !)
  6. I have to say that the nose shapes on the contrail kit are way off ....the Merlin kit has a way more accurate nose shape. Very much like the Kora...
  7. Would strong double sided tape help ? That way you could still remove the top dome and hopefully close the gaps ?
  8. Mines just shipped ....also on their bay of E listing there's photos of it in their store
  9. To be fair the Mach 2 lifting bodies are WAY more accurate than Anigrands HL10 which is like a squared off caricature of the real thing ....
  10. I'm in the "buy it so we get the 1/32nd Fairey Fruitbat sooner camp !"
  11. Agree totally .it's part of the absolute brilliance of the show
×
×
  • Create New...