Jump to content

Paolo6691

Members
  • Content Count

    252
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

48 Good

About Paolo6691

  • Rank
    Established Member
  • Birthday 11/30/1974

Contact Methods

  • MSN
    Macx91@yahoo.it
  • ICQ
    0
  • Yahoo
    Paolo6691

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    {EGHR}
  • Interests
    WW2
    AMI
    US NAVY '60-70
    small air forces of WW2
  1. To go from Tracer to Trader you need the S-2 wings. From Trader to S-2 new fuselage and nacelles Let's hope!
  2. Let's hope a S-2, especially an S-2F will come later. The tracer will be in my to get list!
  3. /sarcasm on This is the year we will see the HH-101 in 1/72 /sarcasm off
  4. They are including the range finder, I can do Lope's hope from the box, it seems.
  5. Very happy about the Tempest mk.II, Let's hope for the first version of Indian roundels like this one https://images.app.goo.gl/6sjyqrpS1bNNxcyX8
  6. My figure painting skills are not good enough in 1/72, even the most fervid imagination would be able to see that from figures painted by me in 1/144!
  7. First I don't see any problem in a pin-up decal on a plane. I remember I bought the original Airfix B-17 with my mom when I was 10 or so and that one had a pin-up on the box art, my mom didn't had any problem at the time. I also think as said before that a building a bomber and then being shocked by pin-up decal is quite misguided. We should be careful, if this the approach only airliners will be offered soon (no war, no sex content), and then only gliders (not polluting), Be careful what you wish!
  8. Interesting. I had a very quick look around the web but I didn't found it anywhere. Do you know where I can get it?
  9. Great pictures. Does anybody knows the status of Italeri HH-101C caesar? The scheme is included in the xtradecal sheet but I don't know if there is any conversion around- Cheers Paolo
  10. Very interesting Thank you. Do you know if there is a list extant with all the squadrons that received their standards before the 1960?
  11. Hi XV107 Do you mean that with the very small numbers of squadrons in existence now there is no hope for a squadron with less the 25 years service, or it is a formal rule, no squadron without standard will be considered? Thank you
×
×
  • Create New...