Jump to content

Floggerman

Members
  • Posts

    187
  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Germany

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Floggerman's Achievements

New Member

New Member (2/9)

280

Reputation

  1. Just a hint: the missile is a radar-controlled... and the MiG-27 had no radar.
  2. Depending of what version of 27 you can add some more (i.e. main landing gear - later versions have the samt sit as 23MLs. Also different sensors/noses etc.) All in all - 23BN and (later) 27 are very different planes in detail.
  3. As modeldoc already wrote, the Su-22 was not in Luftwaffe service but flew in the WTD-61 (Wehrtechnische Dienststelle, Military-technical Testing Center). This does not belong to the Air Force but is under the Ministry of Defence. They carried Iron Crosses and the batch of the WTD (as in the decal sheet). Of course it is possible to build a MiG-21 with Iron Crosses, but one should keep in mind that - as mentioned - these were only applied for photo purposes and sometimes only on one side! They never flew like this. Same with MiG-23.
  4. The front wheels are bigger (that's why the doors have a bulge, size is 570 x 140). The rudder had no dampers (the BN is closer to the M than to MF (for Trumpy all the same...)). The Delta-antenna on the right fixed wing. The fixed front part of the fin could have the shape of M or MF, check references.
  5. According to the black-and-white pics from these planes I'd say, this model is very close to reality: https://karopka.ru/community/user/6776/?MODEL=245938
  6. There was also an IL-28U for a movie production. Today it's in bad state: https://www.airfighters.com/photo/104850/M/East-Germany-Air-Force/Ilyushin-IL-28U/193/ The iron cross (on strange place) is still visible, the swastika not (no wonder). As this was used for static display only, the right side wasn't camouflaged. If the cammo scheme wouldn't be that difficult, I could not resist...
  7. ...and much better than Trumpy (as mentioned) because it has no seams. I use it for my Trumpy as well as for refurbishing the old MPM
  8. I just ordered the replacement canopy from Special Hobby (https://www.specialhobby.eu/en/our-own-production/l-39-injected-canopy-1-48.html?cur=1&listtype=search&searchparam=l-39) I'll try to replace the Trumpy canopy because all tree parts have a nasty seam in the middle (and I'd destroy the windshield during polishing...)
  9. I build the MPM years ago (actually I restore it as some parts were eaten by carpet monster and the canopy is "golden" too...). It might be 10 years ago or more, but I'll never forget the pain with this kit.. At the moment I build the Trumpy one (conversion to V target tug), and it's very nice. Surface is excellent, fit without problems. The level of detail is medium, especially the cockpit deserves something more. As I will close the cockpits (rear cockpit contains only the wire drum), for me no problem. Some problems only with the decals, they are wrong in many details. That's why I was happy to see that HAD Models from Hungary came out with 2 sheets for L-39, among them my East German V! I paid a lot of money, just to learn that "reserach" in Hungarian means the same than in Chinese. Pure disappointment!
  10. AFAIK that's unfortunately correct . I've build their La-9 and it was fantastic too.
  11. I try this: https://picload.org/view/dciapali/dsc_0053.jpg.html The build was complicated due to the huge number of parts. Instruction was not very detailed, lots of tiny parts unclear. The cockpits (3!) and the bomb bay are pieces of art. The clear resin parts are fantastic. All in all a dream of a kit - but it led me to my limits.
×
×
  • Create New...