Welcome to Britmodeller.com

Register now to gain access to all of our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to contribute to this site by submitting your own content or replying to existing content. You'll be able to customize your profile, receive reputation points as a reward for submitting content, while also communicating with other members via your own private inbox, plus much more! This message will be removed once you have signed in.

This site uses cookies! Learn More

This site uses cookies!

You can find a list of those cookies here: mysite.com/cookies

By continuing to use this site, you agree to allow us to store cookies on your computer. :)

  • Announcements

    • Mike

      PhotoBucket are no longer permitting 3rd party hosting   01/07/17

      As most of you are now painfully aware, Photobucket (PB) are stopping/have stopped allowing their members to link their accumulated years of photos into forums and the like, which they call 3rd party linking.  You can give them a non-refundable $399 a year to allow links, but I doubt that many will be rushing to take them up on that offer.  If you've previously paid them for the Pro account, it looks like you've got until your renewal to find another place to host your files, but you too will be subject to this ban unless you fork over a lot of cash.   PB seem to be making a concerted move to another type of customer, having been the butt of much displeasure over the years of a constantly worsening user interface, sloth and advertising pop-ups, with the result that they clearly don't give a hoot about the free members anymore.  If you don't have web space included in your internet package, you need to start looking for another photo host, but choose carefully, as some may follow suit and ditch their "free" members at some point.  The lesson there is keep local backups on your hard drive of everything you upload, so you can walk away if the same thing happens.   There's a thread on the subject here, so please use that to curse them, look for solutions or generall grouse about their mental capacity.   Not a nice situation for the forum users that hosted all their photos there, and there will now be a host of useless threads that relied heavily on photos from PB, but as there's not much we can do other than petition for a more equitable solution, I suggest we make the best of what we have and move on.  One thing is for certain.  It won't win them any friends, but they may not care at this point.    Mike.


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

30 Excellent

About DarrenH

  • Rank
  • Birthday

Contact Methods

  • ICQ
  1. Glad i ordered the CWS noses looking at thst photo comparison. The Revell revised lower panel looks pinched not smooth curves like on the big Mig. No complaints on engineering here as without it tooled this way there "would be no 1/48 Mig-25". big aeroplane, big tooling costs and a seperate tool for each model is fantasy land stuff. Cant wait for the big Wild Weasel...
  2. Great looking 25 mate thanks for doing the groundwork on these Soviet birds operating over Israel..
  3. Have both now and its going to come to choices. If have a slightly squashed ie vertically undersized front windscreen canopy that does look a little small compared to KH but more accurate finer details that have no "impact" visually on the look of the kit id go Kittyhawk. if you some how want finer accurate details yet can live with an undersize canopy/windscreen which may throw off the look of the aeroplane more than incorrect panels etc then HB. If you used the KH clear parts on the HB kit might keep an accuracy guy happy at a price ie expensive and spine not fixed but you "could graft the akH spine parts. If you dont care about minutae and can live with the multi part fuse assembling them in there seperate halves oob the KH kit. If you can live with the slightly squashed canopy/windscreen and want ease of build HB. Overall for me the KH kit as i dont know nor care about minute accuracy issues and the overall look/shape is better. Line ball though and if an easy canopy solution appears i might go HB.. Both have faults. Might have to check if my old KP kit canopies fit the HB kit not sure if they will work but might be a solution to at leadt the clear parts.
  4. Looking at pics if you want to do one in flight with slats retracted the new Hobbyboss kit will be excellent. Far less work than blending those Hasegawa slats into the leading edge. For parked id still go Hasegawa...all the kits you listed need work of some shape ie rescribing etc. Accuracy it really depends how serious you are about it...seen some nice looking Hobbycraft builds but really ifyou can save yiurself the work and grab a Hasegawa kit.
  5. Agree Dave the kit is not perfect and could be improved. However its fsr better than his review rated it and completely superior in every way to the old OEZ kit. its just a pity modelling has now descended to having reviews put together not to asses the kit but to garner attention in the worst possible style. And then people believe the garbage...
  6. If you build the kit using a small portion of your brain it goes together quite well. Anyone basing an opinion on the way the kit was built in that video which was clearly to gather clicks and stir up controversey would be better off drinking paint thinner. Does anyone anywhere build any model exactly according to instructions? Rule 1 of modelling is instructions are a guide not a straightjacket. Hence reviewer A builds kit according to instructions not common sense and standard modelling practice. Hence it doesnt fit so of course its all Kittyhawks fault. If he had simply done a build assembling the fuselage halves from there seperate pieces as "anyone" with a modicum of modelling experience would do he would of found it goes together quite well...geez what a surprise... Instead he ripped KH a new one because he checked in any semblence of intelligence/common sense/modelling experience in prior to building it. Looked to me like he was out to score cheap points and clicks not build the kit as he would if he where building it for himself. Poor reviewing at best and an opportunity lost to show people a great technique that saves plenty of heartache in MANY kits including many Hasegawa kits. instead he just took the cheap shot.
  7. Did you test fit any of the parts? There have been significant fit issues reported with Revell aparrantly tweaking the molds after the last test shot. The tweaking meant none of the fuselage bulkheads fit that well leaving a gap top and bottom on fuselage join.
  8. Kittyhawk

    Yes exactly..as per the way you build almost any multi part fuselage kit. Assemble the three left fuse pieces to make a single left fuselage. Assemble the three right fuse pieces to make a single right fuse piece. Then close her up with all assicated bits and its fits quite nicely other than needing tabs on the aft most piece on each fuse.
  9. Be all over a couple of these!
  10. Differences there are so insignificant to my eye as to simply say which one builds better? having gotten the 6 part KH fuse together by putting them together in halves its still work I coukdclive without doing again. Next SU-17 will be HB for me.
  11. Kittyhawk

    Just building mine. When building the fuselage do not follow the instructions. Assemble the left and right fuselages as seperate halves all joined prior to putting them together. If you assemble them per the instructions you will have significant fit issue on rear to mid fuse fit. However some styrene tabs fixes all that in 2 seconds and you assemble in complete halves. Detail is excellent and if built in halves builds really ok so far.
  12. No complaints from here...sold!
  13. Looking at the flat profile if the HB kit the KP one looks far better being quite a bit taller in profile. As for them being pinched i can live with that as you cannot see it from any angle the kit will be viewed from normally. The height of the front windscreen frame however stands out clearly and flattens the canopy profile and can be seen from almost every view you will look at it from. An easy fix for an obvious problem with luck that will immediately make it look much better to my eye. Im not interested in fixing issues i cant clearly see anymore, to much effort for to little reward.
  14. Given Kittyhawks engineering record i think my old KP windscreens might find a new home on the Trumpyboss kit. Interested to see a head to head comparison...
  15. Just wondering what manufacturer that your kits from as i cant think of one manufacturer with an unblemished record. None...zero...zip. As we have been waiting for an SU-34 for like twenty years and i have learnt the ability to use a file and sandpaper this kit will come together brilliantly. Bye bye Madcop...