Jump to content

Habu12

Members
  • Posts

    1,218
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by Habu12

  1. 7 hours ago, Selwyn said:

    Ā 

    Ā 

    Drill Skyflash as seen in this picture, were painted Gloss LAGĀ  and regularly cleaned, as obviously opposed to theĀ  Phantom in the picture!Ā If you compare the missile colour to the DrillĀ  sidewinders which are white, andĀ Ā the greyĀ  "Top" drop tankĀ  which is obviously a clean replacementĀ  explainsĀ why they stand out in this picture.Ā  Real skyflash were Matt LAG by the way, but in my many years personal experienceĀ  of maintaining and instructing on skyflash missilesĀ  I can assure you that they were never ever painted white.

    Ā 

    Selwyn

    (Sorry abut the double picture post , Finger trouble!)

    Good for you! Paint it whatever color your heart desires on your next build šŸ‘šŸ¼

  2. 6 hours ago, Selwyn said:

    Airframe wise they are very similar I agree, but the clincher is the fact Skyflash missiles were Ā overall Light aircraft Grey in colour and Sparrows were whiteĀ so I would suggest the difference stands out a lot!

    Ā 

    Selwyn

    Fully-Armed-Phantom.jpg

    Well seeingĀ as how the belly is LAG, those look a lot lighter to me. Iā€™m fine with my choice of color.Ā 

  3. 1 hour ago, Farmerboy said:

    Building as we speak, as usual with these new airfix kits finding that test fitting is critical, top spine and intake covers need a bit of work to get a decent fit,did you have same problems? or is it just me. Great model you have done, hoping my efforts get to look half as good as yours, good job.

    Nope, no issues with the tops of the intakes. Just glued together and sanded flush!

    • Thanks 1
  4. 5 hours ago, Selwyn said:

    Really nice build,Ā  I think you have done a great jobĀ  on this,Ā  particularly like the mettallic'sĀ  andĀ  staining on the tail.

    One criticism,Ā  FalklandsĀ  Phantoms flewĀ  with Skyflash missiles,Ā  Sparrows were not used in the Falklands.Ā  (I think by 1982 the Sparrow was out of RAF service anyway)

    Ā 

    Selwyn

    In 1/72, theyā€™re near as makes no difference. Ref pics show Skyflash/Sparrow loaded on the jets. šŸ‘šŸ¼

  5. Airfixā€™s latest Phantom release. I used the Xtradecal sheet to make Faith, which had the gray tail, instead of white. Standard fare, OOB except for the AIM-9s, since the kit didnā€™t come with AIM-9L, only AIM-9J. So I raided my spares. The only issue was the closed canopy. I had made some custom ejection loops, and they would not allow the canopy to sit. So off they came and it still didnā€™t sit right. So it has those big ugly gaps on the left and shims on the right. Other than that, lovely kit. Iā€™m still developing my scoring system, and this is a relelease anyway, so no scores on this one.Ā 

    LH7s1Kw.jpgamgpqKg.jpgLym4bwn.jpgzYWY61Z.jpgGav2SwU.jpgWpwaB0B.jpgHRouE5U.jpgitTmu5o.jpgEJY9SwN.jpg

    • Like 62
  6. 15 hours ago, Cloudman1961 said:

    Lovely piece of work.Ā 

    Ā 

    Iā€™m about to start work on a Revell 1/72 hunter. Iā€™d be interested to know whatĀ colours youĀ usedĀ on the inside of the air intakes?

    None. Whatsoever. Left them bare. You donā€™t see in there at all. In fact, unless the lip has a distinct color demarcation, like an F-16, I donā€™tĀ paint inside any of my intakes. To me, itā€™s a waste of time.

    • Like 1
  7. Many times when I build a subject I gain a new respect for its shape. And I thought I couldnā€™t appreciate the beautiful lines of the Hunter. But wow, this is just such a gorgeous jet! Definitely one of the best of all time. Anyway, Iā€™m coming up with a new rating system for kits. Itā€™ll be based on Doug Demuroā€™s ā€œDoug Scoreā€, if any of you are YouTube car guys. But itā€™s a dual block, fiveĀ category system, of 100 points. Sounds complicated, I know. Iā€™ll elaborate more later since Iā€™ve nailed down all the categories šŸ˜†

    but general impressions are the usual for new Airfix kits, very good fit, some good detail, but could use a bit more. Not that it matters much in the cockpit, as itā€™s black anyway, so you done much past the seat top. No major fit issues.

    fHyRDiD.jpggZ5VDZW.jpg3kSINWl.jpg4Zgo9dZ.jpgLYSiGI0.jpgk4ccu7X.jpg

    tZdsa03.jpgSQyzEax.jpg

    • Like 54
  8. Now before some of you comment that this is or isnā€™t a a Finnish built Blenheim, I couldnā€™t confirm or deny it in my research. So it is, a Mk.I from the initial batch, as seen in 1942 as far as I can tell. If not, I donā€™t care. I wanted something different with this new release.Ā 

    The kit is very nice, not quite as crisp as other recent releases, but pretty close. No issues encountered.Ā 

    vdYGFvm.jpgGk4j7ze.jpgIstPcp4.jpgIA6fSLB.jpg9LGgkov.jpg7ufUn9E.jpg84PFAby.jpg4AeTMsB.jpgM3dEy4G.jpg

    • Like 25
  9. On 1/10/2019 at 3:55 PM, FAAMAN said:

    Great cat, lovely finish :coolio:

    In general fabric areas should be lighter with top sides far lighter still due to sun light.

    Being an Aleutian Cat, there wasnā€™t the same fading as youā€™d see on a tropical Cat. My refs showed a lot less wear on Alaskan PBYs. Having spent the last three months there, I can see why. The sun isnā€™t out much in the winter.Ā 

×
×
  • Create New...