Jump to content

KevinK

Members
  • Posts

    412
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KevinK

  1. 5 hours ago, Ben Brown said:

    I was once told by an ex-North American engineer that when General Dynamics took over NAA, literally tons of NAA historical records went in the dumpster.

    GD was never involved: it was Rockwell who bought NAA in 1967, followed by Boeing in 1996. I rather suspect that the closure of Downey with the Boeing merger would be when records disappeared.

  2. On 7/7/2023 at 8:58 AM, Hamiltonian said:

    A bit more custom paint mixing to try to reproduce the odd gold tint on the SM RCS nozzles

     

    Out of interest, the nozzles were made of a columbium / hafnium alloy. The uneven discolouration visible in the photos occurs after the first firing - the acceptance test of the thruster before it was installed in a quad. Of course, this doesn't actually help you find a paint, but burnt steel/titanium doesn't look that different.

    • Like 1
  3. 1 hour ago, MDriskill said:

    New Orleans, Louisiana is famously: Noo-or-LEENS in most of the South, but more like N'AW-lins if you live there.

     

    Absolutely true. In the '80s there was an article in the Times-Picayune - the local paper - which noted that New Orleans was possibly the only city in the world to have streets named after all nine of the Greek muses, but mispronounced every one of them.

    • Haha 5
  4. On 12/20/2022 at 10:27 AM, AdrianMF said:

    Also, the photo here of a 39 Sqn Beaufort in its revetment in Malta shows a brown air tail. This is also reproduced (albeit highly saturated) on the back of the Warpaint booklet. Only noticed this one today when I was looking for the "smoking gun" picture.

     

    I've not seen a B&W version of either photo (although you can get to B&W from colour quite easily!), but they could still be colourised. I took it as good enough for me.

    That photo, or another from the same sequence, was on the cover of an Airfix Magazine circa 1970 or so, in colour. Sorry, I can't recall the exact issue at 50 years' distance, but since colourisation wasn't really going back then, I'm pretty sure it's genuine! It looks like Kodachrome.

     

    Kevin

  5. Just an observation on JF299, if you choose that one as a subject: it's not a Mk XVI, it is in fact one of the rarest of Spitfires, a Mk VIII with a cut-down rear fuselage.

    It's from the first production batch of Mk VIIIs and was retained by Supermarine to try out the change before it was introduced on production, for late Mk IXs and XVIs at Castle Bromwich.

    Otherwise, it's a straight Mk VIII, with shortened ailerons, 18 gal/side wing tanks, tropical filter, retractable tailwheel, etc. when compared with a Mk XVI. As it's early production, it has the rounded rudder prior to the pointed one on later production.

    • Thanks 2
  6. 41 minutes ago, Phoenix44 said:

    what's the reddish stick thing in front of the windscreen on the colour shot of the Va?

    I'm not sure, but it's not part of the aircraft.  My guess would be a cup/can of some sort, resting against the base of the windscreen as it's about the only place on the outside of the Spit fuselage where you could do that.

  7. Just a speculation: the Vimy replica G-AWAU, which was built at Weybridge, flew in 1969. The Dr Who film was released Aug 1966. Is is possible that components such as cowlings were being mocked-up early in the Vimy build and were offered to the nearby film studio when surplus?

     

    I seriously doubt that the RR engines are in the cowlings, given the flimsy-looking supports partly visible in the screenshots.

    • Like 1
  8. 1 hour ago, Maginot said:

    In addition, ground attack was a role for which the Spitfire Mk VIII was ill suited

    Hmm...I wouldn't agree with that. Mk VIIIs and IXs were very successfully used for exactly that purpose by Balkan Air Force (part of Mediterranean Allied Air Forces) in Italy and Yugoslavia, dive-bombing and strafing trains and trucks as the Germans were trying to resist the Soviet advance and the Yugoslav Partisan army. With 2 x 250 lb bombs, 2 x 20 mm cannons and 4 x .303, plus the use of a 30, 45 or 90 gal drop-tank, it had the performance, armament and range to strike at a wide range of targets over a good radius of action.

     

    As an example, my father flew them with 253 Sqn in 1944/45 and - at least one occasion - flew a 4-hour sweep from Prkos, Yugoslavia into Romania. His logbook shows squadron dive bombing accuracies of 17-50 yards, locomotives and trucks destroyed - with camera-gun photos. The only obvious vulnerability of the Spitfire in this role was the loss of the cooling system to minor damage, but this was exactly the same as for the Hurricane, Mustang, Typhoon and Mosquito, all of which were Merlin-powered.

  9. I'm not sure that your assumption of the Mk VIF inherently being a night fighter variant is correct.

     

    Beaufighter VI s were either C (Coastal) or F (Fighter). Both types were long-range fighters, the main difference being the VIF engine was optimised for high altitude and the VIC for low. It is true that (most?) home-based Mk VIFs were equipped as night fighters because that was the local need in 1942/3, but overseas units in the India/Burma theatre also needed the Mk VIF as a day fighter, mainly for the range but also because there weren't many other suitable types available.

     

    It's also the case that the Far East was one of the lowest priority theatres of operations for equipment supply: it may have been that the Mk VIC would have been desired but not available due to Coastal Command's home-based needs - just a thought.

     

    The other obvious type - the Mosquito - came much later to the Far East because - initially at least - there were serious problems with the glued structure in hot, high-humidity conditions.

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...