Jump to content

Spit PR Ic, P9385 from No 8 OTU, 1940


Antoine

Recommended Posts

Starting this one today.

Don't know if I'd be able to do a real step by step post, but we'll see.

photo_10.jpg

- Tamiya 1/48 spit I

- Model Alliance 1/48 decal sheet PR Spits part I, ref 48131

- Airwaves 1/48 conversion fro Spit PRIc Type 2, ref 48038

:eat:

Edited by Antoine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If that one goes together as nicely as the Mk.Vb from Tamiya you're in for a very enjoyable build!

My one suggestion is to glue the upper wing surfaces to the fuselage first and then add the bottom. Like I didn't. :analintruder:

Have fun!

I didn't too!

Too late.

;)

STAND BY

Edited by Antoine
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

I'm working on small parts, that will beglued latter, after painting.

photo_27.jpg

The screw, finished and varnished.

Propeller tips are yellow, RLM04 to keep things easy.

Blade are black

Hub alu.

the spinner is PRU pink. My "recette" is 5 drop of flat white tamiya (Much easier to use than gunze's), and a touch of red.

DIfficult to see with the light...

photo_28.jpg

The undercart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some difficulties with the PR canopy.

photo_33.jpg

Not that easy to cut....

I've butchered it a little...

photo_34.jpg

Masking.

You really need a new cutter blade.

photo_35.jpg

The aft part, masked and in place.

photo_36.jpg

And the front...

I've glued one side after the other.

There are still some huge gaps, but I'll rework it once everything is dry, with some little putty rolls.

Let's hope it'll work...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Gary,

First time I use a vac canopy.

It's true that it looks nearly ok (!) on the pic, and I'm nearly surprised, as I've seen it nearly all the afternoon long with my magnifying glass in front of the eyes! And then, it has an ugly look, with great big gaps.

The putty is on, let's see tomorrow if I get some honourable result.

;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

spit_010.jpg

As there is to my knowledge no ready to use PRU pink available on the market, I did my own mixture, using tam XF2 flat white (9/10), and gunze H19 (1/10), straight on the airbrush.

Does it seems PRU pink enough to your eyes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be wrong – but does it need the gunsight mount?

Ahem....

Should be under the masking tape...

At least I hope...

Or did I slaughter it some months ago?

I may have sacrified it to the carpet monster, too...

Even if I have no carpet.

:smartass:

Well, I truly don't know, we'll see tonight, when I take the tape off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Antoine,

I was given a recipe for PR pink sometime in March/April. I will see if I can find the post

Found It.

The recipe is 1/4 roundel red to 3/4 white, plus a touch of light gray to tone it down. ( thank again to Christian)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Found It.

The recipe is 1/4 roundel red to 3/4 white, plus a touch of light gray to tone it down. ( thank again to Christian)

Are you really sure?

1/4 roundel red should give something too much pink, I think.

I thought the PRU pink was nearly white.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The monitor may be exaggerating, but possibly too pink. You want an off-white.

The pic was taken in late afternoon, just before a storm, and without much daylight, only interior light.

The kit is much clearer in good daylight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Starting this one today.

photo_10.jpg

:eat:

By the way, if you subsequently get tempted into doing that rather fetching Spitfire R7335 of 718 Sq, FAA, pse note that the code should read G3K on both sides, G3*K on the RHS and almost certainly G*3K (not K*G3) on the LHS. FAA codes comprise 3 elements and almost invariably read in the same order on both sides, as opposed to RAF codes where there can be discretion about how the 2-element squadron code and the individual a/c code are displayed (eg AA*B, B*AA, *AA-B).

Same mistake made in the instructions to the Seafire (is it 06B?) in the Airfix 1/72 FAA special issue. set.

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, if you subsequently get tempted into doing that rather fetching Spitfire R7335 of 718 Sq, FAA, pse note that the code should read G3K on both sides, G3*K on the RHS and almost certainly G*3K (not K*G3) on the LHS. FAA codes comprise 3 elements and almost invariably read in the same order on both sides, as opposed to RAF codes where there can be discretion about how the 2-element squadron code and the individual a/c code are displayed (eg AA*B, B*AA, *AA-B).

Same mistake made in the instructions to the Seafire (is it 06B?) in the Airfix 1/72 FAA special issue. set.

Nick

Note taken, as I plan to build more PR spits.

But as far as I know, there are no conversion at the moment for a XIII.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

spit_011.jpg

The mask on the canopy is off.

I was afraid to discover the result, as I thought the mask has been damaged during the putty/sanding session.

But in the end, it looks quite fine.

I must admit that the result is not really to notch, but still, bearing in mind that its a rhodoïd canopy, I'm pleased with it

I'll maybe try to cure the seam between the windshield and the fuselage with some basic masking, and then putty/sanding again, but I'm afraid to get a worst result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...