Jump to content

Question about haseg Spit V overall quality?


Antoine

Recommended Posts

Hello there,

I've read much comment about the general quality of haseg Spit IX, the main problem being, if I undestood well, the shortness of the nose and fuselage (I know I must miss something).

But I was wondering if it was also true with their Mk.V, as I've seen some pretty cool boxart, with colour options that suits my interest.

But maybe tamiya's mk.V is a wiser choice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello there,

I've read much comment about the general quality of haseg Spit IX, the main problem being, if I undestood well, the shortness of the nose and fuselage (I know I must miss something).

But I was wondering if it was also true with their Mk.V, as I've seen some pretty cool boxart, with colour options that suits my interest.

But maybe tamiya's mk.V is a wiser choice?

Hi Antoine

Did you read that : Fighters Forum

Patrick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello there,

I've read much comment about the general quality of haseg Spit IX, the main problem being, if I undestood well, the shortness of the nose and fuselage (I know I must miss something).

But I was wondering if it was also true with their Mk.V, as I've seen some pretty cool boxart, with colour options that suits my interest.

But maybe tamiya's mk.V is a wiser choice?

Hi Antoine,

The Hase Spitfire Mk.Vb certainly does not suffer from the same dimension problems as their Mk.VIII/IX series did, it's accurately a very nice kit. IIRC there is nothing really of any import that re separates the Hasegawa or Tamiya or offering when it comes to the Mk.V series.

I have built both numerous times and they are both delightful.

Cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Antoine

Did you read that : Fighters Forum

Patrick

Thanks, but no, I didn't. I don't know if it's a valuable review speaking about dimensions accuracy..

Hi Antoine,

The Hase Spitfire Mk.Vb certainly does not suffer from the same dimension problems as their Mk.VIII/IX series did, it's accurately a very nice kit. IIRC there is nothing really of any import that re separates the Hasegawa or Tamiya or offering when it comes to the Mk.V series.

I have built both numerous times and they are both delightful.

Cheers

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello there,

I've read much comment about the general quality of haseg Spit IX, the main problem being, if I undestood well, the shortness of the nose and fuselage (I know I must miss something).

But I was wondering if it was also true with their Mk.V, as I've seen some pretty cool boxart, with colour options that suits my interest.

But maybe tamiya's mk.V is a wiser choice?

You will be well pleased with the results if you build either of the Vbs, Tamiyas has the edge on buildability because of the tabs and slots in the wing roots to ensure a good fit and establish the dihedral, other than that the only thing about the Hase Vb is that the cockpit and seat are rather small but if you are building it with the canopy closed that hardly matters.

To my eye the Hase Vb looks a little more 'delicate' that the Tamiya offering, but dimensionally they are all but identical. Not to say either is 'accurate' but they were obviously both designed off the same set of drawings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But they did!

John

And they were not the only one, as most 1/72 Mk.IX kits are inaccurate in a way or the other. It's really weird to see that one of the best known subjects of all has so often been interpreted so badly. Guess that its lovely lines are more difficult to understand than it may look.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...