Jump to content

What RAF Squadrons flew the C-45 (Expeditor)?


phat trev

Recommended Posts

The simple answer is that it was not a "squadron" type, but used in small numbers on communications duties, Staff HQ duties, etc. Looking at the 93 a/c in the HBxxx range, the one unit to have more than just a handful was 1330 Conversion Unit, at Bilbeis, used to provide initial twin experience. For the rest you have ACC Bulgaria, 216 Group CF, Burma CF, BAFSEA CF, Austria CF etc. No squadrons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks for that Graham.

I am interested therefore in the aircraft used in Burma and BAFSEA.

(what was 216 group?)

would you be able to recommend any sources for photos?

The simple answer is that it was not a "squadron" type, but used in small numbers on communications duties, Staff HQ duties, etc. Looking at the 93 a/c in the HBxxx range, the one unit to have more than just a handful was 1330 Conversion Unit, at Bilbeis, used to provide initial twin experience. For the rest you have ACC Bulgaria, 216 Group CF, Burma CF, BAFSEA CF, Austria CF etc. No squadrons.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._216_Group_RAF

I suspect the C-45s were used to ferry pilots about.

Photos? Of second-line RAF aircraft overseas? Can I start laughing (hysterically) now? I wish. I have seen one photo of a SEAC C-45, but it was very plain jane bare metal with just roundels and serial. I suspect that was normal for the type. There was one recent warbird in FAA Sea Blue Gloss overall, and there is a photo justifying that in one or more of the Air Britain FAA books but you want RAF.

OK, Putnam's Aircraft of the Royal Air Force. HB275, camouflaged top yellow(presumably, looks like it) undersides, 1943-type roundels (like the RAAF, fairly large blue and white only). 231 Gp CF. 231 Gp was a bomber group. (OK, I've seen two photos.....) There's nothing in Putnam's Beech Aircraft. Presumably there is at least one other batch of serials, as there's another 200 or so aircraft I haven't accounted for yet.

Yup. KJxxx and KNxxx almost 150 aircraft. Including a nose-on shot of KN116 with late SEAC roundels (a bit large) bare metal and rank pennant on the nose - rear fuselage not seen. Some of these batches ended in 96 Sq and 353 Sq. 353 was a SEAC transport unit using three C-45s for local comms work. 96 was one of the units converted to transports postwar, which is presumably when it had it's two.

The numbers don't seem to add up to the quoted totals, but that's got the majority of them.

Edited by Graham Boak
Link to comment
Share on other sites

cheers Graham, this is a start anyway! I feel the 'plain jane' look is the one I am am to do as i can get some good panel shades going.

I have found an example here http://airfixtributeforum.myfastforum.org/..._t__t_7951.html

of the PM kit built, I like the larger style SEAC? roundles so will be using these.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._216_Group_RAF

I suspect the C-45s were used to ferry pilots about.

Photos? Of second-line RAF aircraft overseas? Can I start laughing (hysterically) now? I wish. I have seen one photo of a SEAC C-45, but it was very plain jane bare metal with just roundels and serial. I suspect that was normal for the type. There was one recent warbird in FAA Sea Blue Gloss overall, and there is a photo justifying that in one or more of the Air Britain FAA books but you want RAF.

OK, Putnam's Aircraft of the Royal Air Force. HB275, camouflaged top yellow(presumably, looks like it) undersides, 1943-type roundels (like the RAAF, fairly large blue and white only). 231 Gp CF. 231 Gp was a bomber group. (OK, I've seen two photos.....) There's nothing in Putnam's Beech Aircraft. Presumably there is at least one other batch of serials, as there's another 200 or so aircraft I haven't accounted for yet.

Yup. KJxxx and KNxxx almost 150 aircraft. Including a nose-on shot of KN116 with late SEAC roundels (a bit large) bare metal and rank pennant on the nose - rear fuselage not seen. Some of these batches ended in 96 Sq and 353 Sq. 353 was a SEAC transport unit using three C-45s for local comms work. 96 was one of the units converted to transports postwar, which is presumably when it had it's two.

The numbers don't seem to add up to the quoted totals, but that's got the majority of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the colours on the SEAC one are, well, imaginative, but the roundels look about right.

The missing examples were in the FTxxx range, and went to the Navy or the RCAF. I found several postwar views of bare metal FAA aircraft, but not yet the dark blue one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HB275 is probably the most common pic of an RAF Expeditor, and there is a flying shot of it in the IWM archive as well (You can get a thumbnail on their website)

This one appeared in Flypast a few years ago in a 'personal photos' page of SEAC/Indian aircraft, and is about the only other pic I know of a camouflaged RAF one that you can make the serial out on (There is a 3/4 rear shot of one in Eyes of the Phoenix that makes a good case for TSS, especially as the pic appears to be taken on a Beach!)

Beech.jpg

I've seen RAF natural metal ones in both European theatre and SEAC roundels, and I have seen a pic of an RAF one in Italy, but it was a small aircraft in a big photo!

Wartime FAA ones were probably TSS over Yellow, with red/yellow serials.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting!

If HB275 was a UK-based Oxford or Anson, I think there'd be no doubt about a TLS/Yellow interpretation. This was specified for trainers and civilian types used as communications aircraft. So is the Expeditor a light civilian Beech 18 being used for communications or is it a military transport C-45? (Yes, I know it was built as a C-45, I wasn't being literal.) The large roundel is what biased me to a 1943 period (and hence white in the roundel and the TLS/Y scheme). Other photos have since shown that this large roundel was common on Expeditors, so this was a false lead.

Could this show TSS over Azure Blue? I think it could, although we are again in the region of interpreting white as light blue on somewhat less-than-firm ground. If you believe it has to be blue, then sure, but it can't be proven not-white from the photo. The difference in contrasts from KJ511 are considerable.

The delivery date of HB275 would help. I suspect it was late, later than 1943, which may create a bias away from TLS/Y.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting!

If HB275 was a UK-based Oxford or Anson, I think there'd be no doubt about a TLS/Yellow interpretation. This was specified for trainers and civilian types used as communications aircraft. So is the Expeditor a light civilian Beech 18 being used for communications or is it a military transport C-45? (Yes, I know it was built as a C-45, I wasn't being literal.) The large roundel is what biased me to a 1943 period (and hence white in the roundel and the TLS/Y scheme). Other photos have since shown that this large roundel was common on Expeditors, so this was a false lead.

Could this show TSS over Azure Blue? I think it could, although we are again in the region of interpreting white as light blue on somewhat less-than-firm ground. If you believe it has to be blue, then sure, but it can't be proven not-white from the photo. The difference in contrasts from KJ511 are considerable.

The delivery date of HB275 would help. I suspect it was late, later than 1943, which may create a bias away from TLS/Y.

Interesting indeed. I'd always assumed (as in "Never entered my head that it could be anything else") that HB275 was in DE/DG/Sea Grey Medium. Given the paucity of photos, do we know that the convention of yellow undersides was observed in SEAC? I notice that in the SAM article on Far Eastern colours (Feb 1994) Geoff Thomas and/or Mike Keep assumed that Argus HB578 and Sentinel KJ420 has SGM udersides.

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another twist - I hope that we can rule out US equivalent colours? (Yes, because as LL aircraft, these would have been delivered in USAAF bare metal.)

The underside of HB275 looks too light for MSG, to me.

Can we confirm yellow was used as undersides in SEAC on non-combat types? I can't, but if the official scheme called for it, then I don't see why not. It was used further East in Australia and New Zealand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is this of interest? 742 Squadron were based Colombo tasked with communications between the scattered RN units. (Squadrons Of The FAA).

Ex.jpg

There are a couple of others in bare metal one of which may have a white topped fuselage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we confirm yellow was used as undersides in SEAC on non-combat types? I can't, but if the official scheme called for it, then I don't see why not. It was used further East in Australia and New Zealand.

Yes, but not on transport types which were specified to be in TSS with Azure Blue underneath not MSG! However the Air HQ India orders 69-76 specifically state that this scheme does not have to be "introduced retrospectively" which leaves open the possibility of previously applied or delivered "non-standard" schemes being retained. IMHO HB275 could be yellow, Sky or even Sky Blue underneath. I doubt that it is Azure or MSG but it could be - I'm reminded of Geoff Thomas' admonition on page 176 of Phoenix.

SEAC training aircraft were specified to be TLS over yellow with a stated exception for the Harvard which was permitted to remain overall yellow (and there are examples of it).

Despite the prevailing view that all SEAC aircraft were TLS over MSG this was not the case. The Air India HQ orders are specific to aircraft roles rather than types and some Beaus on coastal duties were in TSS with Azure Blue rather than white undersurfaces. There was also the Day Fighter Scheme "interregnum" in SEAC, recently confirmed by Edgar.

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, but not on transport types which were specified to be in TSS with Azure Blue underneath not MSG! However the Air HQ India orders 69-76 specifically state that this scheme does not have to be "introduced retrospectively" which leaves open the possibility of previously applied or delivered "non-standard" schemes being retained. IMHO HB275 could be yellow, Sky or even Sky Blue underneath. I doubt that it is Azure or MSG but it could be - I'm reminded of Geoff Thomas' admonition on page 176 of Phoenix.

SEAC training aircraft were specified to be TLS over yellow with a stated exception for the Harvard which was permitted to remain overall yellow (and there are examples of it).

Despite the prevailing view that all SEAC aircraft were TLS over MSG this was not the case. The Air India HQ orders are specific to aircraft roles rather than types and some Beaus on coastal duties were in TSS with Azure Blue rather than white undersurfaces. There was also the Day Fighter Scheme "interregnum" in SEAC, recently confirmed by Edgar.

Nick

Thank you: we live and learn. Are AFO(I) 69-76 available on line?

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two important qualifications.

One. A point I have already made but is best repeated here. Was the Expeditor considered as a transport aircraft or a communications aircraft? The latter were normally camouflaged as trainers. It would not surprise me to find Expeditors in both schemes, depending upon whether the aircraft came under the control of Transport Command or not.

Two. Edgar has not, to my knowledge which I believe is correct in this case, confirmed any Day Fighter interregnum. What he has discovered is a draft document suggesting the introduction of the Day Fighter Scheme in SEAC. He has not (yet?) discovered an example of the issued document corresponding to the draft, nor any evidence that this scheme was adopted in service. I think we are in danger of setting a false hare running here; creating another myth to confuse future generations of modellers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two. Edgar has not, to my knowledge which I believe is correct in this case, confirmed any Day Fighter interregnum. What he has discovered is a draft document suggesting the introduction of the Day Fighter Scheme in SEAC. He has not (yet?) discovered an example of the issued document corresponding to the draft, nor any evidence that this scheme was adopted in service. I think we are in danger of setting a false hare running here; creating another myth to confuse future generations of modellers.

Really? Postagram - Secret from Air HQ India dated 27th October 1943 to 308 & 320 MU, RAF Liaison Officer ARU Santa Cruz, AHQ Bengal and 226 Group HQ, copied to SASO and Ops 41, entitled "Camouflage of Day Fighter Aircraft" which is not a draft but specifies DFS. "These and other similar cases received at 320 MU are to be re-camouflaged prior to despatch. whilst those received at ARU Santa Cruz are to be flown to 308 MU for re-camouflaging. The Day-Fighter scheme with India markings is to be used." This postagram then goes on to specify precisely the DFS colours and markings, so there is no ambiguity. This document has also been mentioned by Paul Lucas as well as the queries and clarifications sought by MU's in response.

And I have also mentioned this postagram in previous threads and postings too. So between the end of October 1943 and 4th April 1944 there is the possibility and probability of some day fighter aircraft being finished in this scheme. Now the interesting thing, perhaps, is whether certain squadrons of Hurricanes were considered not to be "day fighter".

And, just to clarify, the AFO(I) 70 of 4th April 1944 copies the wording of the draft document (not the postagram) almost exactly, except that all fighter aircraft are therein specified to be in TLS with MSG undersurfaces. The draft is referred to in a minute dated 17th November 1943 (after the postagram was sent) so sometime between that date and April 1944 the requirement for DFS was challenged and changed to TLS.

Hence "interregnum"!

Nick

Edited by Nick Millman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You specified Edgar's recent find. The document covering the introduction of the Day Fighter Scheme he has recently discovered (and generously passed around) is clearly labelled as a draft, at the top of the page and in the text (although not on the cover). He has not mentioned nor passed to me any such follow-up documentation as you describe: although this obviously does not deny its existence, the description does apply to what he has found regarding the SEAC roundel. This seems a possibly significant co-incidence. I suggest that you revisit the documentation. There may have been such an interregnum, but according to what I've seen, Edgar's recent find does not confirm it.

In support of your argument, perhaps you could point to other examples of SEAC fighters of this period (Spitfires Mk.V perhaps, or the earliest Mk.VIIIs, or the last Mohawks?) showing the Day Fighter Scheme? It is certainly a fair supposition that several of the Hurricane units were not considered as fighters - those converted from bomber units spring to mind, or the Mk.IIDs. As I understand it however, the photographic evidence remains one Hurricane away from the front line. Not so much a case of a few squadrons of Hurricanes NOT considered as Day Fighter, but only one that was?

However, I feel we have drifted too far from the subject of Expeditors. If you have further evidence I'd love to see it, but can we take it offline or to another thread?

Edited by Graham Boak
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You specified Edgar's recent find. The document covering the introduction of the Day Fighter Scheme he has recently discovered (and generously passed around) is clearly labelled as a draft, at the top of the page and in the text (although not on the cover). He has not mentioned nor passed to me any such follow-up documentation as you describe: although this obviously does not deny its existence, the description does apply to what he has found regarding the SEAC roundel. This seems a possibly significant co-incidence. I suggest that you revisit the documentation. There may have been such an interregnum, but according to what I've seen, Edgar's recent find does not confirm it.

In support of your argument, perhaps you could point to other examples of SEAC fighters of this period (Spitfires Mk.V perhaps, or the earliest Mk.VIIIs, or the last Mohawks?) showing the Day Fighter Scheme? It is certainly a fair supposition that several of the Hurricane units were not considered as fighters - those converted from bomber units spring to mind, or the Mk.IIDs. As I understand it however, the photographic evidence remains one Hurricane away from the front line. Not so much a case of a few squadrons of Hurricanes NOT considered as Day Fighter, but only one that was?

However, I feel we have drifted too far from the subject of Expeditors. If you have further evidence I'd love to see it, but can we take it offline or to another thread?

The postagram was sent to me together with the draft document. Separate documents. And the postagram has already been cited in one of the Lucas books and Edgar's copy confirms that. It is not my argument just a statement that such an order did/does exist and is not a draft. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the SEAC roundel instruction. Again separate document.

Since not all SEAC aircraft were photographed the existence of one aircraft (in India btw) in DFS raises the possibility that there were others - supported by the existence of the postagram. Photos of Spits and Hurris in SEAC are not as numerous as elsewhere which makes the determination of their schemes less certain.

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another twist - I hope that we can rule out US equivalent colours? (Yes, because as LL aircraft, these would have been delivered in USAAF bare metal.)

Yes you can rule out U.S. equivalent colours, but only because they are two tone upper surfaces. However, I don't think we can definitively state that all Expeditors were delivered in bare metal. Some of the HB serial Expeditors diverted to the BCATP in Canada were natural metal and some were OD over NG. In fact I would guess that HD775 is OD over NG.

Jim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could this show TSS over Azure Blue? I think it could, although we are again in the region of interpreting white as light blue on somewhat less-than-firm ground. If you believe it has to be blue, then sure, but it can't be proven not-white from the photo. The difference in contrasts from KJ511 are considerable.

.....and there was me assuming it was DE/DG/Sky.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great info and discussion guys Thanks.

Just dug up the following details, hope they are usfull for others here also...

(cut and pasted from an email so hope you don't mind the odd looking text layout)

RAF Expediter Mk. I

(52 delivered 1944)

In 1944, the British needed commu-

nications aircraft for use in Asia,

the Middle East and at home. There

also existed crew training require-

ments for the British

Commonwealth Air Training Plan,

operated by the RCAF, in Canada. A

total of 119 Expediter I models were

received under Lend-Lease4.10 with

distribution as follows: 52 for the

RAF, six for the Royal Navy, and 61

for the RCAF.4.11 The 52 RAF aircraft

bore serials from HB128 to HB206,

and were shipped by sea beginning

in April 1944, but few of the

Expediter I models were destined

for England. The majority went to

Karachi, India, and the RAF Air

Command South East Asia for

assignment to Communications

Squadrons or Flights. Examples

served with the 3rd Tactical Air

Force, 4th Air Delivery Unit,

Director General of Aviation in

India, 221st Group, 224th Group,

225th Group and 353rd Squadron.

These transported personnel and

equipment, and were in the natural

metal finish with the RAF serial in

black on the rear fuselage and

South East Asia Command

roundels. Those roundels had a

dark blue outer circle and a light

blue inner disc. The usual red cen-

ter was eliminated to avoid confu-

sion with the Japanese national

insignia. The fin flash had light blue

forward and dark blue in the rear.

The 1941 Lend-Lease Act called

for the return of surviving aircraft

at the end of hostilities; RAF

records show 26 were returned.

Two of those went to the AAF, and

the U.S. Navy accepted the remain-

ing 24 at Norfolk, VA, on December

31, 1946.

RAF Expediter Mk. II

(217 delivered 1944-1945)

The RAF was allocated 217 C-45Fs

under the Lend-Lease program4.59

and designated them Expediter Mk.

II models. The Expediter IIs were

serialled KN100 to KN149 (50),

KJ468 to KJ560 (93), and in the

range from HB208 to HB299 (74).

The RAF had a need for communi-

cations aircraft, especially for use in

South Asia, so 151 Expediter IIs

were shipped by sea from the Port

of Newark, NJ, (beginning in June

1944) to Karachi, India. The RAF Air

Command South East Asia assigned

them to various Communications

Squadrons or Flights where they

transported personnel and equip-

ment. For example, Expediter Mk.

IIs “in the KN series were flown dur-

ing 1945-1946 by Polish pilots of the

RAF 229 Group Communications

Flight in India, operating with 9, 10

and 11 Ferry Units.”4.60Initial deliv-

eries to the RAF in north Africa and

the Middle East consisted of 62

Expediter IIs with four serving the

RAF in the U.S.

Note that the RAF spelled the

name differently from its common-

wealth partner, the RCAF, who

spelled it “Expeditor Mk. II.” The

1941 Lend-Lease Act called for the

return of surviving aircraft at the

end of hostilities, and AAF aircraft

record cards note that 145 were

sent back to the AAF, many of

which were stored in Germany.

RAF Expediter II HB253 returned

from service in the Mediterranean,

and was turned over to the AAF in

Romania on July 19, 1946. It was

then registered YR-MIT to King

Michael of Romania with the

Certificate of Airworthiness issued on

October 20, 1946. The King abdicat-

edin December 1947 and left

Romania, but there is no aircraft

cancellation date in the Romanian

records — just the note: “aircraft

flown out of the country by Traian

Udriski with his wife and child on

board in 1948.”4.61 Udriski may have

been the King’s pilot. In February

1950, the plane was registered to

Air Import AG, Switzerland, as HB

GAA, and then to CN de St. Yan

until February 1967 as F-BFRO.

Royal Navy Expediter Mk. II

(61 Delivered 1944-1945)

Sixty-one Lend-Lease Expediter IIs

were delivered to the Royal Navy

and most were delivered to India

for communications work. Serials

included FT980 to FT996 (17),

HD752 to HD776 (25), and in the

range KP100 to KP124 (19). Crated

Expediter IIs arrived in Great Britain

and India and were assembled at

the British Reassembly Division,

Lockheed Ltd., at Liverpool’s Speke

Airport and Renfrew, Scotland; as

well as places such as the Royal

Navy Aircraft Repair Yard at

Coimbatore, India.

In early April 1946, it was

announced that Britain had

received full title to 25 Lend-Lease

C-45s with the understanding that

when they became surplus they

would not be transferred to another

nation without U.S. approval.4.64 It

is probable that they were Royal

Navy Expediter IIs since, by the

end of 1946, the RAF only had a

few left. In January 1949, the Royal

Navy still had 24 in service.

The three primary post-war

Royal Navy Expediter II operators

were: 728 Squadron, Fleet Radio

Unit (FRU) at Hal Far, Malta; 781

Squadron (Southern

Communications Unit) at Lee on-

Solent, UK; and 782 Squadron

(Northern Communications Unit) at

Donibristle, UK. In addition the

Flag Officer Reserve Aircraft (FORA

unit) at Arbroath, Scotland, and the

Flag Officer Flying Training (FOFT

unit) at RAF Merryfield/Yeovilton

used them. The last Expediter IIs

were struck off charge by the Royal

Navy and scrapped at Hal Far in

August 1957.

RAF Expeditors...

TYPE SERIAL FY

AT-7 FR879 42- 2508

AT-7 FR880 42- 2509

AT-7 FR881 42- 43475

AT-7 FR882 42- 43476

AT-7 FR883 42- 43477

C-45B FR940 43- 35535

C-45B FR941 43- 35540

C-45B FR942 43- 35541

C-45B FR943 43- 35629

C-45B FR944 43- 35635

C-45B FR945 43- 35639

C-45B FR946 43- 35645

C-45B FR947 43- 35651

C-45B FR948 43- 35653

C-45B FT975 43- 35539

C-45B FT976 43- 35613

C-45B FT977 43- 35621

C-45B FT978 43- 35623

C-45B FT979 43- 35624

UC-45F FT980 43- 35673

UC-45F FT981 43- 35674

UC-45F FT982 43- 35675

UC-45F FT983 43- 35676

UC-45F FT984 43- 35688

UC-45F FT985 43- 35728

UC-45F FT986 43- 35730

UC-45F FT987 43- 35732

UC-45F FT988 43- 35734

UC-45F FT989 43- 35738

UC-45F FT990 43- 35837

UC-45F FT991 43- 35839

UC-45F FT992 43- 35841

UC-45F FT993 43- 35843

UC-45F FT994 43- 35845

UC-45F FT995 43- 35847

UC-45F FT996 43- 35849

C-45B HB100 43- 35463

C-45B HB101 43- 35465

C-45B HB102 43- 35466

C-45B HB103 43- 35467

C-45B HB104 43- 35468

C-45B HB105 43- 35469

C-45B HB106 43- 35475

C-45B HB107 43- 35476

C-45B HB108 43- 35477

C-45B HB109 43- 35478

C-45B HB110 43- 35479

C-45B HB111 43- 35480

C-45B HB112 43- 35481

C-45B HB113 43- 35482

C-45B HB114 43- 35483

C-45B HB115 43- 35484

C-45B HB116 43- 35485

C-45B HB117 43- 35486

C-45B HB118 43- 35487

C-45B HB119 43- 35488

C-45B HB120 43- 35490

C-45B HB121 43- 35491

C-45B HB122 43- 35492

C-45B HB123 43- 35493

C-45B HB124 43- 35494

C-45B HB125 43- 35495

C-45B HB126 43- 35496

C-45B HB127 43- 35449

C-45B HB128 43- 35453

C-45B HB129 43- 35460

C-45B HB130 43- 35556

C-45B HB131 43- 35557

C-45B HB132 43- 35545

C-45B HB133 43- 35546

C-45B HB134 43- 35547

C-45B HB135 43- 35548

C-45B HB136 43- 35549

C-45B HB137 43- 35550

C-45B HB138 43- 35551

C-45B HB139 43- 35552

C-45B HB140 43- 35553

C-45B HB141 43- 35559

C-45B HB142 43- 35450

C-45B HB143 43- 35455

C-45B HB144 43- 35457

C-45B HB145 43- 35458

C-45B HB146 43- 35459

C-45B HB147 43- 35461

C-45B HB148 43- 35470

C-45B HB149 43- 35471

C-45B HB150 43- 35473

C-45B HB151 43- 35474

C-45B HB152 43- 35512

C-45B HB153 43- 35570

C-45B HB154 43- 35571

C-45B HB155 43- 35572

C-45B HB156 43- 35573

C-45B HB157 43- 35574

C-45B HB158 43- 35579

C-45B HB159 43- 35580

C-45B HB160 43- 35581

C-45B HB161 43- 35582

C-45B HB162 43- 35606

C-45B HB163 43- 35520

C-45B HB164 43- 35522

C-45B HB165 43- 35523

C-45B HB166 43- 35524

C-45B HB167 43- 35525

C-45B HB168 43- 35521

C-45B HB169 43- 35596

C-45B HB170 43- 35585

C-45B HB171 43- 35586

C-45B HB172 43- 35589

C-45B HB173 43- 35526

C-45B HB174 43- 35527

C-45B HB175 43- 35528

C-45B HB176 43- 35534

C-45B HB177 43- 35615

C-45B HB178 43- 35616

C-45B HB179 43- 35617

C-45B HB180 43- 35618

C-45B HB181 43- 35619

C-45B HB182 43- 35620

C-45B HB183 43- 35622

C-45B HB184 43- 35625

C-45B HB185 43- 35614

C-45B HB186 43- 35537

C-45B HB187 43- 35630

C-45B HB188 43- 35632

C-45B HB189 43- 35634

C-45B HB190 43- 35636

C-45B HB191 43- 35638

C-45B HB192 43- 35640

C-45B HB193 43- 35642

C-45B HB194 43- 35644

C-45B HB195 43- 35646

C-45B HB196 43- 35648

C-45B HB197 43- 35650

C-45B HB198 43- 35652

C-45B HB199 43- 35654

C-45B HB200 43- 35656

C-45B HB201 43- 35658

C-45B HB202 43- 35660

C-45B HB203 43- 35662

C-45B HB204 43- 35664

C-45B HB205 43- 35666

C-45B HB206 43- 35667

UC-45F HB207 43- 35668

UC-45F HB208 43- 35669

UC-45F HB209 43- 35670

UC-45F HB210 43- 35671

UC-45F HB211 43- 35672

UC-45F HB212 43- 35690

UC-45F HB213 43- 35691

UC-45F HB214 43- 35692

UC-45F HB215 43- 35693

UC-45F HB216 43- 35694

UC-45F HB217 43- 35695

UC-45F HB218 43- 35696

UC-45F HB219 43- 35697

UC-45F HB220 43- 35698

UC-45F HB221 43- 35699

UC-45F HB222 43- 35700

UC-45F HB223 43- 35701

UC-45F HB224 43- 35702

UC-45F HB225 43- 35704

UC-45F HB226 43- 35706

UC-45F HB227 43- 35708

UC-45F HB228 43- 35710

UC-45F HB229 43- 35712

UC-45F HB230 43- 35714

UC-45F HB231 43- 35716

UC-45F HB232 43- 35718

UC-45F HB233 43- 35720

UC-45F HB234 43- 35722

UC-45F HB235 43- 35724

UC-45F HB236 43- 35726

UC-45F HB237 43- 35741

UC-45F HB238 43- 35745

UC-45F HB239 43- 35749

UC-45F HB240 43- 35753

UC-45F HB241 43- 35757

UC-45F HB242 43- 35761

UC-45F HB243 43- 35777

UC-45F HB244 43- 35781

UC-45F HB245 43- 35785

UC-45F HB246 43- 35790

UC-45F HB247 43- 35801

UC-45F HB248 43- 35805

UC-45F HB249 43- 35809

UC-45F HB250 43- 35813

UC-45F HB251 43- 35817

UC-45F HB252 43- 35821

UC-45F HB253 43- 35825

UC-45F HB254 43- 35829

UC-45F HB255 43- 35831

UC-45F HB256 43- 35833

UC-45F HB257 43- 35835

UC-45F HB258 43- 35851

UC-45F HB259 43- 35853

UC-45F HB260 43- 35855

UC-45F HB261 43- 35857

UC-45F HB262 43- 35861

UC-45F HB263 43- 35859

UC-45F HB264 43- 35865

UC-45F HB265 43- 35869

UC-45F HB266 43- 35873

UC-45F HB267 43- 35877

UC-45F HB268 43- 35881

UC-45F HB269 43- 35885

UC-45F HB270 43- 35889

UC-45F HB271 43- 35893

UC-45F HB272 43- 35898

UC-45F HB273 44- 47080

UC-45F HB274 44- 47082

UC-45F HB275 44- 47084

UC-45F HB276 44- 47086

UC-45F HB277 44- 47088

UC-45F HB278 44- 47090

UC-45F HB279 44- 47092

UC-45F HB280 44- 47094

UC-45F HB281 44- 47096

UC-45F HB282 44- 47098

UC-45F HB283 44- 47122

UC-45F HB284 44- 47126

UC-45F HB285 44- 47130

UC-45F HB286 44- 47134

UC-45F HB287 44- 47138

UC-45F HB288 44- 47142

UC-45F HB289 44- 47146

UC-45F HB290 44- 47150

UC-45F HB291 44- 47154

UC-45F HB292 44- 47158

UC-45F HB293 44- 47162

UC-45F HB294 44- 47166

UC-45F HB295 44- 47170

UC-45F HB296 44- 47174

UC-45F HB297 44- 47178

UC-45F HB298 44- 47182

UC-45F HB299 44- 47186

UC-45F HB488 44- 47295

UC-45F HB489 44- 47297

UC-45F HD752 44- 47102

UC-45F HD753 44- 47106

UC-45F HD754 44- 47110

UC-45F HD755 44- 47114

UC-45F HD756 44- 47118

UC-45F HD757 44- 47202

UC-45F HD758 44- 47206

UC-45F HD759 44- 47210

UC-45F HD760 44- 47214

UC-45F HD761 44- 47218

UC-45F HD762 44- 47302

UC-45F HD763 44- 47304

UC-45F HD764 44- 47307

UC-45F HD765 44- 47309

UC-45F HD766 44- 47312

UC-45F HD767 44- 47400

UC-45F HD768 44- 47404

UC-45F HD769 44- 47408

UC-45F HD770 44- 47412

UC-45F HD771 44- 47415

UC-45F HD772 44- 47499

UC-45F HD773 44- 47503

UC-45F HD774 44- 47507

UC-45F HD775 44- 47511

UC-45F HD776 44- 47515

UC-45F KJ468 44- 47190

UC-45F KJ469 44- 47194

UC-45F KJ470 44- 47198

UC-45F KJ471 44- 47222

UC-45F KJ472 44- 47226

UC-45F KJ473 44- 47230

UC-45F KJ474 44- 47234

UC-45F KJ475 44- 47238

UC-45F KJ476 44- 47242

UC-45F KJ477 44- 47246

UC-45F KJ478 44- 47250

UC-45F KJ479 44- 47254

UC-45F KJ480 44- 47258

UC-45F KJ481 44- 47262

UC-45F KJ482 44- 47266

UC-45F KJ483 44- 47271

UC-45F KJ484 44- 47276

UC-45F KJ485 44- 47280

UC-45F KJ486 44- 47285

UC-45F KJ487 44- 47290

UC-45F KJ490 44- 47300

UC-45F KJ491 44- 47315

UC-45F KJ492 44- 47320

UC-45F KJ493 44- 47325

UC-45F KJ494 44- 47329

UC-45F KJ495 44- 47334

UC-45F KJ496 44- 47339

UC-45F KJ497 44- 47343

UC-45F KJ498 44- 47347

UC-45F KJ499 44- 47352

UC-45F KJ500 44- 47356

UC-45F KJ501 44- 47360

UC-45F KJ502 44- 47364

UC-45F KJ503 44- 47368

UC-45F KJ504 44- 47372

UC-45F KJ505 44- 47376

UC-45F KJ506 44- 47380

UC-45F KJ507 44- 47384

UC-45F KJ508 44- 47388

UC-45F KJ509 44- 47392

UC-45F KJ510 44- 47396

UC-45F KJ511 44- 47418

UC-45F KJ512 44- 47422

UC-45F KJ513 44- 47429

UC-45F KJ514 44- 47432

UC-45F KJ515 44- 47436

UC-45F KJ516 44- 47440

UC-45F KJ517 44- 47444

UC-45F KJ518 44- 47448

UC-45F KJ519 44- 47452

UC-45F KJ520 44- 47456

UC-45F KJ521 44- 47460

UC-45F KJ522 44- 47463

UC-45F KJ523 44- 47467

UC-45F KJ524 44- 47471

UC-45F KJ525 44- 47475

UC-45F KJ526 44- 47479

UC-45F KJ527 44- 47483

UC-45F KJ528 44- 47487

UC-45F KJ529 44- 47491

UC-45F KJ530 44- 47495

UC-45F KN100 44- 47704

UC-45F KN101 44- 47705

UC-45F KN102 44- 47707

UC-45F KN103 44- 47708

UC-45F KN104 44- 47709

UC-45F KN105 44- 47710

UC-45F KN106 44- 47711

UC-45F KN107 44- 47712

UC-45F KN108 44- 47713

UC-45F KN109 44- 47714

UC-45F KN110 44- 86945

UC-45F KN111 44- 86947

UC-45F KN112 44- 86948

UC-45F KN113 44- 86949

UC-45F KN114 44- 86951

UC-45F KN115 44- 86952

UC-45F KN116 44- 86953

UC-45F KN117 44- 86954

UC-45F KN118 44- 86990

UC-45F KN119 44- 86991

UC-45F KN120 44- 86992

UC-45F KN121 44- 86993

UC-45F KN122 44- 86994

UC-45F KN123 44- 86995

UC-45F KN124 44- 86996

UC-45F KN125 44- 86997

UC-45F KN126 44- 87078

UC-45F KN127 44- 87079

UC-45F KN128 44- 87080

UC-45F KN129 44- 87081

UC-45F KN130 44- 87082

UC-45F KN131 44- 87083

UC-45F KN132 44- 87084

UC-45F KN133 44- 87085

UC-45F KN134 44- 87152

UC-45F KN135 44- 87153

UC-45F KN136 44- 87154

UC-45F KN137 44- 87155

UC-45F KN138 44- 87156

UC-45F KN139 44- 87157

UC-45F KN140 44- 87158

UC-45F KN141 44- 87159

UC-45F KN142 44- 87235

UC-45F KN143 44- 87236

UC-45F KN144 44- 87237

UC-45F KN145 44- 87238

UC-45F KN146 44- 87239

UC-45F KN147 44- 87240

UC-45F KN148 44- 87241

UC-45F KN149 44- 87242

UC-45F KP100 44- 47701

UC-45F KP101 44- 47702

UC-45F KP102 44- 47703

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...