Jump to content

Anyone know when the Spitfire PR1G entered service?


Dave Fleming

Recommended Posts

Hello Dave,

According to the Shacklady book, Spitfire - The history, the PR 1Gs were conversions done by Heston Aircraft. So I do not think there was a specific production start date. The serials were in the R,N,AA,AB batches. The Shacklady book has abbreviated airframe histories.

Hope this helps :unsure:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Dave,

According to the Shacklady book, Spitfire - The history, the PR 1Gs were conversions done by Heston Aircraft. So I do not think there was a specific production start date. The serials were in the R,N,AA,AB batches. The Shacklady book has abbreviated airframe histories.

Hope this helps :unsure:

Thanks Tony,

Had a look at STH, like most of the other sources it doesn't state when the 1G entered service - I guess I'll have to look through the individual histories and see which airframes were converted first.

My guess is late 1940, but my curiosity wants to know when!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

N3113 27-3-43; N3241 2-6-42; P9328 11-6-42; P9505 19-2-43; P9518 4-5-42; R6910 2-1-42; R6964 30-8-42; R7028 17-1-42; R7059 1-5-42; R7116 20-1-42; R7130 11-6-42; R7139 22-2-42; R7143 29-10-42; R7197 23-6-42; R7211 13-3-42; R7308 14-2-43 then converted to XIII; R7335 re-converted to XIII; X4021 re-converted to XIII 29-4-43; X4162 4-2-43; X4333 12-4-42; X4384 27-2-42; X4411 2-10-42; X4555 4-4-44 to Canada for trials; X4596 8-1-43; X4599 6-8-42; X4620 4-2-43; X4645 1944 (cat "E" 7-9-44); X4672 30-9-42; X4766 re-converted to XIII; X4784 ? -42 FTR 14-4-42; X4786 3-1-42; X4839 13-9-42; X4907 17-1-43; AR234 13-3-42; AR235 10-2-42; AR239 22-11-42; AR242 5-4-42; AR244 13-2-42; AR245 30-1-42; AR257 4-3-42 (painted pink at some stage); AR258 25-3-42; AR260 20-5-42; AR261 5-5-42. At least I think so.

Edgar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't put the converted date, which could have been (and was) some time before the date of entry into service, which I took to be the date when it went to a Squadron, OTU, or whatever, and those are the dates above (according to STH, anyway.)

Edgar

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Ventura book on Merlin engined PR Spitfires, states the PR 1G was used to photograph the first Freya siites in France in Spring 1941. I'll confirm the dates when I get back to my references, but well before May.

Ok, checked the book, it talks about the photgraphing of the Freya site at Auderville. It gives first mission date as 16th February, flown by Sgt Parrott, which was driven off by AA fire and the second, successful mission, as 22nd February, flown by P/P W K Manifould. No serials ae mentioned.

Hope this is of use

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Incidentally, StH gives R7059, which is the earliest I have found so far, being converted in March 1941, which would explain why it was at St Eval in May 1941

And this a/c was one of the 'Presentation' a/c being named Southampton 1

From Edgars list the following also had names.

X4599 - Plymouth and Southsea 1

X4907 Macclesfield

Source Harlforg Pub by Bruce Robertson.

Spitfire Story of a Famous Fighter

Adrian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

I've been reading through some documents again, and I have a letter from Sidney Cotton to Geoffrey Tuttle, dated 11/06/40. At the end, Cotton (who sent the letter from Tigeaux) says, "Have requested the armed Spitfire from you today." I don't think Cotton would have had any need for a non-PR Spitfire, so I can only guess that they had a prototype IG as early as this.

Edited by ben_m
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I should have carried on reading before posting... I have the reply from Tuttle to Cotton, dated the next day, 12th June 1940:

"The armed SPITFIRE did not leave today as the guns had not been fully tested but is leaving tomorrow morning and I am sending a corporal armourer with tool kit to look after it.It has, as you know, two split 8" cameras in the back but no extra tank. It will however, I suggest be quite useful. At any rate, it will give us a line on the suitability of armed aircraft for our work."

Edited by ben_m
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...