Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello Dear Modellers!

I buid BAC TSR-2.

 

I will use resin aftermarket by SMK, Quickboost, Armory in my work, decals by Hobby Decals.

I plan to completely recut the jointing. I want to get the correct geometry.

photo_2025-02-18_16-48-52 (2)

 

photo_2025-02-02_06-28-04

 

photo_2025-02-18_16-48-54 (4)

 

photo_2025-02-18_16-48-52 photo_2025-02-18_16-48-53 (2)

 

photo_2025-02-18_16-48-53 (5)

 

photo_2025-02-18_16-48-53 (7)

 

photo_2025-02-18_16-49-22

 

photo_2025-02-18_16-48-53

 

photo_2025-02-18_16-48-54 (2)

 

photo_2025-02-18_16-48-54

 

photo_2025-02-18_16-48-54 (3)

 

 

 

 

  • Like 10
Posted

Firstly, :welcome: aboard :yes:

 

A good choice of subject, but I'm interested in what you plan to undertake based on the following two sentences:

 

1 hour ago, Amahas said:

I plan to completely recut the jointing. I want to get the correct geometry.

 

I know the kit has some shape issues, particularly the over-rotund fuselage behind the nose, but I'd like to hear about the details :) I've still got a couple of Dynavector kits due to the issues with the Airfix kit, so I'm very interested :hmmm: 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Oooh, following. You have all the aftermarket I see. Should build up into something spectacular.

 

Are you building one of the real jets or doing an in-service scheme?

Posted

This is quite an old kit; I started one in 2015.

 

My suggestions for "aftermarket" part options are:

 

1. Be very selective - particularly with canopies and other transparent parts; for instance, I found that the CMK replacement canopy for the pilot's cockpit windshield is incorrect - having been to the RAF Cosford Museum and seen the aircraft "close-up", I can say that the front central panel is rectangular, as per the Airfix part, not trapezoidal (inward-sloping side rails) as on the CMK replacement vac-form moulding.

 

2. I strongly advise against replacing the original undercarriage (Landing Gear) moulded-plastic legs with any of the various "white metal" aftermarket options; the "white metal" used for such parts is very weak and the mouldings need considerable and very careful cleaning-up, using strong magnification and bright lighting. The quality of the metal alloys (mostly lead-based [Pb] used by the different manufacturers varies a great deal. My research on the topic of "white metal" proved that there is no standard for model parts! (The only other industry which uses "white metal" is the vehicle-engine makers, who only use it (if at all now) for engine bearings, such as on crankshafts and connecting-rod big ends, where there is a continuous, high-pressure lubrication!) I have tried using some of these parts, only to need to drill through them and insert steel rods and pins tor the wheels and main legs.

 

3. Many of the aftermarket parts are extremely fragile and easily damaged, even when removing them from the moulding blocks. While they do provide extra, fine detail, much of this detail will be difficult to see (wheel wells or electronics and weapons bays), so the added visual "value" of these is questionable.

 

Having said all this, I enjoyed building the kit (over a considerable period), but do please take your time and think carefully about each step. There is plenty of additional advice and information available online. Also, a visit to either RAF Museum, Cosford or the Imperial War Museum, Duxford will be very well worth the time and money, both for your TSR-2 model and for future model builds.

 

Enjoy! 

  • Love 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Technik1.wills said:

Это довольно старый набор; я начал собирать его в 2015 году.

 

Мои предложения по вариантам запчастей «послепродажного» рынка:

 

1. Будьте очень  избирательны, особенно с фонарями и другими прозрачными деталями; например, я обнаружил, что сменный фонарь CMK для лобового стекла кабины пилота неправильный. Побывав в музее Королевских ВВС в Косфорде и увидев самолет «крупным планом», я могу сказать, что передняя центральная панель имеет прямоугольную форму, как у детали Airfix, а не трапециевидную (боковые направляющие с наклоном внутрь), как у сменного вакуумного формования CMK.

 

2. Я настоятельно не рекомендую заменять оригинальные опоры шасси (шасси) из формованного пластика на любые из различных вариантов вторичного рынка из «белого металла»; «белый металл», используемый для таких деталей, очень слабый, и отливки требуют значительной и очень  тщательной очистки с использованием сильного увеличения и яркого освещения. Качество металлических сплавов (в основном на основе свинца [Pb], используемых разными производителями, сильно различается. Мои исследования на тему «белого металла» доказали, что не существует стандарта для деталей моделей! (Единственная другая отрасль, которая использует «белый металл», — это производители двигателей для транспортных средств, которые используют его только (если вообще используют) для подшипников двигателя, например, на коленчатых валах и больших концах шатунов, где есть непрерывная смазка под высоким давлением!) Я пробовал использовать некоторые из этих деталей, но мне пришлось только просверлить их и вставить стальные стержни и штифты в колеса и основные опоры.

 

3. Многие из деталей вторичного рынка чрезвычайно хрупкие и легко повреждаются, даже при извлечении их из формовочных блоков. Хотя они и обеспечивают дополнительную, тонкую детализацию, большую часть этих деталей будет трудно увидеть (колесные арки или отсеки электроники и оружия), поэтому их дополнительная визуальная «ценность» сомнительна.

 

Сказав все это, я получил удовольствие от сборки набора (в течение значительного периода), но, пожалуйста, не торопитесь и тщательно обдумывайте каждый шаг. В сети доступно множество дополнительных советов и информации. Кроме того, посещение музея Королевских ВВС в Косфорде или Имперского военного музея в Даксфорде будет очень полезно и стоить времени и денег, как для вашей модели TSR-2, так и для будущих сборок моделей.

 

Наслаждаться! 

This is very cool! I want to see your model! Share a photo?

Posted

Good luck Amahas, it's a good base to work from. Lots of work ahead, particularly the forward fuselage and intakes but look at all the reference material now available and you'll be fine. There's new info turning up all the time. Look forward to progress....

I've got another one of the original kits lurking in the stash somewhere with requisite aftermarket but not sure if I want to go through all that work again! 

 

Quote

If you are up for it General Melchett general melchett build is fantastic

 

Thanks Robert...cheque's in the post.

  • Agree 1
Posted
11 hours ago, Amahas said:

This is very cool! I want to see your model! Share a photo?

Hi!

Thank you for replying so soon, and welcome to the forum. 🙂I am still finishing my 1/48 Airfix TSR-2, and am now putting the decals on the completed (a very long story!) kit, after almost 10 years of building. (Admins, is there any “punishment” or award [medal, etc.] for such a long-term build?)

 

Once I have completed this stage, (which will be very soon!) I will post some photos for you…

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, general melchett said:

Good luck Amahas, it's a good base to work from. Lots of work ahead, particularly the forward fuselage and intakes but look at all the reference material now available and you'll be fine. There's new info turning up all the time. Look forward to progress....

I've got another one of the original kits lurking in the stash somewhere with requisite aftermarket but not sure if I want to go through all that work again! 

 

 

Thanks Robert...cheque's in the post.

Hello General Melchett, Sir,

 

I must admit, I understand your reluctance to repeat the experience. It is a lot of work, and the time needed on research was extensive. I am not intending to repeat the experience either; firstly, I may not have enough life-span remaining, and secondly, the build was demanding, if not traumatic - and I have no great desire to be “certified” under the Mental Health Act, let alone detained!
 

I salute you.

 

I am, sir,

sincerely…

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
On 18/02/2025 at 20:48, scautomoton said:

Oooh, following. You have all the aftermarket I see. Should build up into something spectacular.

 

Are you building one of the real jets or doing an in-service scheme?

I build XR219 in first flight

Posted
18 hours ago, general melchett said:

Good luck Amahas, it's a good base to work from. Lots of work ahead, particularly the forward fuselage and intakes but look at all the reference material now available and you'll be fine. There's new info turning up all the time. Look forward to progress....

I've got another one of the original kits lurking in the stash somewhere with requisite aftermarket but not sure if I want to go through all that work again! 

 

 

Thanks Robert...cheque's in the post.

Hi General 

 

Can you post pick of your build?

Posted (edited)

Hi anders, no problem. I finished mine as a what-if operational aircraft of 3 squadron circa 1970, fitted with the long-range ferry tank, a pair of Blue Water tactical nuclear missiles and a brace of Martel anti-radiation weapons.

 

 

 

98059301-3e4f-4268-89ed-4f3390f849ae.jpg

 

 

 

 

P1120046-1.jpg

Edited by general melchett
  • Like 6
  • Love 2
Posted
4 hours ago, general melchett said:

Hi anders, no problem. I finished mine as a what-if operational aircraft of 3 squadron circa 1970, fitted with the long-range ferry tank, a pair of Blue Water tactical nuclear missiles and a brace of Martel anti-radiation weapons.

 

 

 

98059301-3e4f-4268-89ed-4f3390f849ae.jpg

 

 

 

 

P1120046-1.jpg

wow that's awesome. I like it in the camo. The only I've seen is all white. Great kit.

On 19/02/2025 at 12:45, general melchett said:

Good luck Amahas, it's a good base to work from. Lots of work ahead, particularly the forward fuselage and intakes but look at all the reference material now available and you'll be fine. There's new info turning up all the time. Look forward to progress....

I've got another one of the original kits lurking in the stash somewhere with requisite aftermarket but not sure if I want to go through all that work again! 

 

 

Thanks Robert...cheque's in the post.

Hi General 

 

Can you post pick of your build?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 19/02/2025 at 09:13, Robert said:

If you are up for it General Melchett @general melchett build is fantastic

Regards

Robert 

 

Robert linked it above

  • Love 1
Posted
9 hours ago, general melchett said:

Thanks Amos, appreciated. It hasn’t been out of it’s box for the best part of fifteen years, better check it hasn’t turned to the styrene equivalent of dust…:analintruder:

In a box? Surely Melchett Towers has an entire wing dedicated to display cases showcasing every build The General has ever made!

 

Which reminds me, I must buy another glass shelf.....

  • Haha 1
Posted
Quote

In a box? Surely Melchett Towers has an entire wing dedicated to display cases showcasing every build The General has ever made!

 

When I say box I mean a hermatically sealed sarcophogus interred deep within the catacombs beneath MT, along with all the others that venture out to various shows now and then. Lady M strictly forbids any of these being displayed in any display cabinets around the halls of MT as these are reserved for far more important works of art picked up at local boot fairs and charity shops...remember, happy wife, happy life.  

 

Anyway, back to amahas wonderful build. A lot of that aftermarket wasn't available when I built mine...hmmm, tempting!

  • Agree 1
Posted

Great to see another one on the bench. I got this kit a couple of years ago and haven't started it yet but love seeing all the past builds. Following this one now.

  • Agree 1
Posted
On 2/18/2025 at 11:21 PM, Amahas said:

 

photo_2025-02-18_16-48-53 (5)

 

How would you rate the CMK replacement cockpit? I'm still on the fence about this.

 

And what do you think are the absolute must have upgrades and would that be because of poor detailing or inaccuracies?

 

Are you also correcting the angle of the landing gear?

Posted (edited)

Got one of these stashed away with all the CMK/Eduard detail sets. The Pavla seats are better than the CMK seats in terms of detail if you can get them. I got some from the aviation megastore.

Edited by Whitewolf
  • Thanks 1
Posted
On 24.02.2025 at 18:17, Whitewolf said:

Один из них припрятан вместе со всеми наборами деталей CMK/Eduard. Сиденья Pavla лучше, чем сиденья CMK с точки зрения детализации, если вы сможете их достать. Я купил несколько в авиационном мегасторе.

I plan to make the cocpit and undercarriage bays myself. I didn't like the resin parts, they were blurry. 

I enjoy scratchbuilding.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...