Classic 1950’s Aircraft group build now withdrawn and combined with “Baby Boomers:1946-1964” group build.

[JOCKNEY]

This isn't a era I normally build in, so it's the ideal opportunity to change that, now decisions decisions 

 

Cheers Pat 

[Corsairfoxfouruncle]

7 hours ago, JOCKNEY said:

This isn't a era I normally build in, so it's the ideal opportunity to change that, now decisions decisions 

 

Cheers Pat 

@CliffB and PAT… Welcome along. Its always a good time to expand horizons Pat. Im sure you can find something interesting and obscure that will garner attention. 

[Corsairfoxfouruncle]

@JOCKNEY lets make sure its not Orange this time. 😉

[Corsairfoxfouruncle]

Hello everyone,

@Chrisj2003, @The Rat, @Marklo, @modelling minion, @LorenSharp, @bianfuxia, @zebra, @UberDaveToo, @Adam Poultney, @ModelingEdmontonian, @John Masters, @dnl42, @franky boy, @Mjwomack, @81-er, @Mr T, @Ray S, @Colin W, @TonyW, @drdjp11, @JOCKNEY

 

@CliffB and I are considering merging this build with the Baby Boomers 1946-1964 group build. I would of course co-host that build assisting Cliff. The idea is not to steal votes from each other if this build gets into the bunfight. We’re asking if this would be an issue or if everyone is on board with the idea ? Please feel free to post your thoughts and let us know.
 

@Enzo the Magnificent just checking to see if this is acceptable ? Let us know if you think its ok and what we might need to do ? 
 

Dennis

[81-er]

I'm good with that

 

James

[modelling minion]

I'm happy with that Dennis, sounds like a good idea to me.

 

🇺🇦

[dnl42]

Works for me. 

[Chrisj2003]

And for me. Might avoid NMF.  😌  At the end of the day I’ll only start 4 GBs next year so less choice is better. 

 

Chris

[Enzo the Magnificent]

34 minutes ago, Corsairfoxfouruncle said:

@Enzo the Magnificent just checking to see if this is acceptable ? Let us know if you think its ok and what we might need to do ? 
 

 

It's perfectly acceptable and a wise course of action.    Rhe next step would be to inform me that you are doing it.   Er...   wait a minute...     

 

Just change the header of the thread to indicate that it has been withdrawn and/or combined. 

[Corsairfoxfouruncle]

3 minutes ago, Enzo the Magnificent said:

 

It's perfectly acceptable and a wise course of action.    Rhe next step would be to inform me that you are doing it.   Er...   wait a minute...     

 

Just change the header of the thread to indicate that it has been withdrawn and/or combined. 

Ok withdrawn and the header has been amended. 

[franky boy]

Fine with me. Good idea. 

[Adam Poultney]

Yep that works, I don't think it's in anyone's interests to have two very similar group builds in the running. Vulcan or a glider for me.

[bianfuxia]

Makes sense to me too - always saddens me a bit to see a good GB idea miss out and two practically identical ones get up. Spread the love, I say!

[LorenSharp]

This works for me.

[UberDaveToo]

Works for me...

[Mr T]

Works for me as I am signed up for both groups. A big overlap in topics. One less GB to fit in. 

[Ray S]

It sounds like a good plan to me, glad you have done it!

 

 

Ray

[vppelt68]

I'm very happy to write that I'm too young for this one, so I'll pass . V-P

[CliffB]

54 minutes ago, vppelt68 said:

I'm very happy to write that I'm too young for this one, so I'll pass . V-P

 

You've hopefully appreciated V-P, that it's the subjects that have to have been made between 1946 and 1964, not the participants.

Just checking .

 

[vppelt68]

9 minutes ago, CliffB said:

 

You've hopefully appreciated V-P, that it's the subjects that have to have been made between 1946 and 1964, not the participants.

Just checking .

 

Well I did know that, but... as it popped into my mind, I just had to write it! Ok, add me to the list too. V-P

[CliffB]

9 minutes ago, vppelt68 said:

Ok, add me to the list too. V-P

 

Excellent!  Will do.

[Corsairfoxfouruncle]

7 hours ago, vppelt68 said:

I'm very happy to write that I'm too young for this one, so I'll pass . V-P

Now now VP we all know there were B-17’s in use at this time. Air-sea rescue USAF, USN, and USCG. There were the all black B-17’s operated by the CIA out of the Philippines as well. Not too mention those used as aerial surveyors, map makers, airlines, and business transports. 

[vppelt68]

18 minutes ago, Corsairfoxfouruncle said:

Now now VP we all know there were B-17’s in use at this time. Air-sea rescue USAF, USN, and USCG. There were the all black B-17’s operated by the CIA out of the Philippines as well. Not too mention those used as aerial surveyors, map makers, airlines, and business transports. 

Thanks Dennis, but I'm not THAT fixated to B-17:s only, like you and Pat believe