Jump to content

Recommended Posts

What a cracking idea and presentation this is!

 

When I first saw it, I thought "how the Dickens has that been done?", and thankfully you gave the answer! All three Shacks look fantastic, and I will be very happy if my two turn out half as good. I don't think I will try the 'in flight' option, I still don't know how your wire holds it up, it looks too thin!

 

All the best,

 

Ray

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Ray S said:

What a cracking idea and presentation this is!

 

When I first saw it, I thought "how the Dickens has that been done?", and thankfully you gave the answer! All three Shacks look fantastic, and I will be very happy if my two turn out half as good. I don't think I will try the 'in flight' option, I still don't know how your wire holds it up, it looks too thin!

 

All the best,

 

Ray

Thanks, Ray, and others who have commented.

 

Regarding the stand - The high-tensile wire is surprisngly stiff, but even so, . I figured that a considerable twisting moment would be exerted at the point where the stand penetrated the model as it was located so far from the model's center of gravity and the large wingspan would easily cause one or other wing to drop and begin the twist. If I'd used a round socket for the piano wire I could have superglued it into the model to solve the problem in the same way the wire will be glued into the base. Had I done so the model would not be removable from the stand for travel. But, a spin-resistant plug and socket were required as I wanted to be able to remove it from the stand.

The square tube that I used to make the socket is anchored to the bottom of the fuselage where it enters the model, and again where it penetrates the observer's floor running between the tail-wheel housing and the clear tail cone. This floor is firmly anchored to both fuselage sides along its length which serves to spread any twisting loads on the socket along these strong joins. Finally, the socket is anchored again to the top of the fuselage.

Edited by Kiwikitbasher
Fix a typo.
  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow indeed! Brilliant job on the kit(s) and the presentation! How did I miss this one? I love the Shackleton. VP293 (the T.4) looks so colourful in its RAE livery. I've just bought my third MR.3 (the newish Revell kit*), and I'm thinking about buying my fifth MR.2. It's not my fault, really, it's just that I have so many transfers for Shackletons I need kits to put them on, you see.

 

Best Regards,

 

Jason

 

*Revell have actually fixed or ameliorated some of the (not many) problems with this kit. The cockpit canopy is clearer, the mystery window opening on the aft starboard fuselage has been filled in, and the shrinkage on the upper wings above the flaps is no longer apparent. It's nice to see Revell fixing these problems, making a nice kit even better.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Learstang said:

Wow indeed! Brilliant job on the kit(s) and the presentation! How did I miss this one? I love the Shackleton. VP293 (the T.4) looks so colourful in its RAE livery. I've just bought my third MR.3 (the newish Revell kit*), and I'm thinking about buying my fifth MR.2. It's not my fault, really, it's just that I have so many transfers for Shackletons I need kits to put them on, you see.

 

Best Regards,

 

Jason

 

*Revell have actually fixed or ameliorated some of the (not many) problems with this kit. The cockpit canopy is clearer, the mystery window opening on the aft starboard fuselage has been filled in, and the shrinkage on the upper wings above the flaps is no longer apparent. It's nice to see Revell fixing these problems, making a nice kit even better.

I think the mystery window opening is the sonobuoy ejection chutes: four square openings in a row* covered on the outside with a doped fabric patch which was sacrificed when the buoys were launched.

 

*  Depending on the Phase and Mark of the aircraft they could be four-square or four in a row.

Edited by stever219
Missed a bit.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@AdrianMF 

 

Thanks, Adrian,

 

Here're some more with rea-mounted stands which may appeal as well...

319831161_723884735738177_98328611033336

 

and without the stand being edited out...

320160633_3381137562099695_4776536667008

 

Just an old airbrush needle re-purposed...

320591559_611008567466971_89794120412898

 

More conventional...

320676769_1167362834150419_7710187844723

 

320701353_1220047665588908_8468918931244

 

320586513_679328467071501_85452756072090

 

Or this one...

320552180_843166726930074_62011096297845

 

320546470_2319804618186538_6255698562904

 

320672316_933993207497143_70686626499246

Edited by Kiwikitbasher
Add images
  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love that Blinder! The Blinder may have been a troublesome aircraft, to put it mildly, but it was a looker, sort of retro-futuristic! That Tempest looks great as well.

 

Regards,

 

Jason

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...