stevehed Posted July 27, 2022 Share Posted July 27, 2022 Probably a daft question but I'm no mechanical genius. Twin rows started with rotary engines in WW1 and later in the 30's I've come across Gnome Rhone combining two rows of seven cylinders to make 14 to increase the power. During WW2 there are eighteens and so on. All these engines have equal numbers of cylinders in each row, that is 7 +7, or 9+9. Would it be possible to have a front row of five cylinders and a rear of nine to make 14 or are there technical issues. In my head I'm thinking that five cylinders might allow more air to the rear row to assist with cooling. Regarding the weight the rear row would be heavier and might this help with CoG issues. Regards, Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vesa Jussila Posted July 27, 2022 Share Posted July 27, 2022 One thing what comes to my mind is that two rows share main axle where crankshaft is connected. 5-cylinder have different ignition order than seven or nine cylinder ones. So synchronization would be difficult. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theplasticsurgeon Posted July 27, 2022 Share Posted July 27, 2022 An interesting question. Another thing that springs to mind is the unequal power from each row - and the stress that puts onto the crankshaft. Normally with a twin row, each cylinder in the back row will be behind a gap formed by front row cylinder. All those gaps being equal - the theoretical cooling is equal. That's no longer the case with unequal rows. Then there's differing spare parts for each row. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogsbody Posted July 27, 2022 Share Posted July 27, 2022 If it was possible, it would have already been tried by someone. Chris 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevehed Posted July 27, 2022 Author Share Posted July 27, 2022 Thanks Everybody. All good points. I think Chris has hit the nail on the head too. I couldn't find any examples / prototypes anywhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
europapete Posted July 27, 2022 Share Posted July 27, 2022 short answer...no. many, many, technical reasons why. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dov Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 Impossible! Because of dynamic forces of the engine. Because of geometry In case of same number of cylinder many dynamic forces resullt in a ZERO vector. Otherwise not. Each twin radial runs smoothly, in opposition toi a single row one! Geometry: How to lead the pipes of inlket or outlet? Symetry too! Same question you can ask for propellers. On a multi engined a/c to get the number of propellers changed from inner to outer engine! Basic: Make all things as simple as possible! Happy modelling 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan B Posted July 28, 2022 Share Posted July 28, 2022 15 hours ago, Vesa Jussila said: One thing what comes to my mind is that two rows share main axle where crankshaft is connected. 5-cylinder have different ignition order than seven or nine cylinder ones. So synchronization would be difficult. That's the main issue. Duncan B 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MDriskill Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 (edited) Also, having a lot of open space between cylinders, does not necessarily help cooling. Early single-row radials had fully exposed cylinders, which was adequate at lower power levels. But most of the airflow thus takes the path of least resistance between the jugs, instead of passing through the cylinder cooling fins. More powerful single-row engines of the WW2 era usually had baffles between the cylinders to force more air through the fins. Closely-fit double rows, with the cylinders staggered, help to do the same job for each other. Edited November 21, 2022 by MDriskill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogsbody Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 2 hours ago, MDriskill said: Also, having a lot of open space between cylinders, does not necessarily help cooling. Early single-row radials had fully exposed cylinders, but most of the airflow thus takes the path of least resistance between the jugs, instead of passing through their cooling fins. More powerful single-row engines of the WW2 era usually needed baffles fit between the cylinders to force more air through the fins. Closely-fit double rows, with the cylinders staggered, help to do the same job for each other. The baffles as used on a Bristol Mercury: Chris 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now