Jump to content

HobbyBoss 1/48 F-105D Thunderchief


Recommended Posts

Hi there!

This is my recent project. There are few choices if you want an 1/48 F-105(D/G) so I went with HobbyBoss for this. I can’t say I didn’t know about its flaws. I’ll list them here, so perhaps I can give my contribution to those who, like me, love the ‘105 and want to build one.

As written in almost every review, the kit is really overengineered in several areas. For instance, the engine, the 20mm gun, the spoilers have way too many parts, that can lead to poor alignment, if you don’t pay attention. 

The fitting, in general, is just regular, with its fair share of flash and injection marks. The landing gear, in particular, is tricky. As the real jet, the main legs are tall and skinny, and the way they must be glued is really bad. The whole thing feels like it’s gonna colapse at any moment. Not to mention the instructions could be clearer, that's in general.

Two advices, if I may. Have the two fuselage halves completed before joining them, instead of doing like the instructions say. That’s because the tail cone is not a great fit either. And, if you decide to let the nose landing gear to be assembled later, contrary to the instructions too, it’s possible and will prevent damaging it during the whole process. You just assemble the mandatory half of it inside the bay box and let the rest for later.

Also, HobbyBoss must have hired a new riveter for this kit, because, man, there must be hundreds of them, everywhere. So, sanding and rescribing will keep you busy for hours. 

Regarding the decals, they don’t look too good at first glance, but they are. Good response to Mr Softer and not too fragile, with almost no silvering, especially after matt varnish. 

But, you’ll notice some of them are just missing. Sometimes there should be two, one for each side of the fuselage, you see them in the instructions but………they’re not there. On the other hand, you have lots without a clue about where to place them.

Anyway, this one was OOB except for the metal pitot tube and Quick Boost ejection seat. Paints were Gunze Aqueous and Laquer based. 

I’d say it turned out ok, and I’m happy to have a ’105 in my shelf now. But, probably because of “that girl all over the nose”, my wife is not that thrilled! 

Cheers!

 

 

spacer.pngspacer.pngspacer.pngspacer.pngspacer.pngspacer.pngspacer.pngspacer.pngspacer.pngspacer.pngspacer.png

  • Like 72
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lightningboy2000 said:

Wow! Fantastic!

Thank you!

1 hour ago, Tomcat101 said:

One thing I can never seem to get right is panel lines.  You obviously do not have that issue. :)  The build, weathering and of course the panel lines look incredible. Nicely done.

Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That’s a nice job. I built the G last year, and enjoyed the kit immensely. You have called out the shortcomings in the kit correctly too, in my opinion.

Especially the landing gear. There is no real way to strengthen it, short of putting a wire core in them. At least the D allows you to pose the canopy open, I notice! The kit supposedly has some accuracy issues, but nothing that worried me.

again. Lovely job on your build. Always great to see this kit built.

Bruce 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, billn53 said:

I love the Thud (even more than Phantoms), and yours does not disappoint!

Thank you!

7 hours ago, pacificmustang said:

That’s a nice job. I built the G last year, and enjoyed the kit immensely. You have called out the shortcomings in the kit correctly too, in my opinion.

Especially the landing gear. There is no real way to strengthen it, short of putting a wire core in them. At least the D allows you to pose the canopy open, I notice! The kit supposedly has some accuracy issues, but nothing that worried me.

again. Lovely job on your build. Always great to see this kit built.

Bruce 

Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RidgeRunner said:

You have to love a Thud :)

Thank you! That's right!

2 hours ago, Sky Keg said:

This is a superb rendition of the famed Thud.  Very nice!!!!! :goodjob:

 

Mike

Thank you!

31 minutes ago, Shar75 said:

Super! I really liked the performance. Coloring and burn-in is very realistic.

Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a thoroughly impressive Thud!

 

For my personal taste, I find the panel joints looking a bit over-emphasized, especially on the wings (judging from the excellent photos). Others will probably have a different opinion. 😉

 

Magnificent modelling!

 

Kind regards,

 

Joachim

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Spitfire31 said:

That's a thoroughly impressive Thud!

 

For my personal taste, I find the panel joints looking a bit over-emphasized, especially on the wings (judging from the excellent photos). Others will probably have a different opinion. 😉

 

Magnificent modelling!

 

Kind regards,

 

Joachim

Thank you! And I agree with you, I always try to keep the colors as close as possible as those of the actual birds. Fortunately, in the actual model with natural light they are not that emphasized. I guess the automatic camera enhancement and mini studio box lighting may have given that impression. But, I'll pay attention next time.

3 hours ago, RaceAddict said:

Wow! I'm a big fan of pinup nose-art... and this one is a seriously eye-catching example. 😁

Thank you!

2 hours ago, Bertie Psmith said:

That is a beauty! I'm very impressed with the painting.

Thank you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...