Parrahs Posted November 15, 2021 Share Posted November 15, 2021 Would anyone here happen to know if there are any external differences between the Skyflash and AIM-7E? I'm trying to figure out of I could swap in Eduard's Sparrows on a Skyflash-carrying aircraft with just adjusting the colour and markings. Looking at the parts the main question mark would seem to be the nose cone length. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AV O Posted November 15, 2021 Share Posted November 15, 2021 AIM-7E vs Skyflash https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-the-American-AIM-7-Sparrow-and-the-British-Skyflash-missile-Are-they-essentially-the-same-or-does-one-have-capabilities-that-the-other-does-not https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyflash https://wiki.warthunder.com/index.php?title=Skyflash 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selwyn Posted November 15, 2021 Share Posted November 15, 2021 1 hour ago, Parrahs said: Would anyone here happen to know if there are any external differences between the Skyflash and AIM-7E? I'm trying to figure out of I could swap in Eduard's Sparrows on a Skyflash-carrying aircraft with just adjusting the colour and markings. Looking at the parts the main question mark would seem to be the nose cone length. It depends on the time period. First Skyflash was used only on Phantom. The Tornado Embodied Modification Package (TEMP) missiles were used on Phantom/Tornado F2/3, main visual difference on TEMP was cut outs on the missile forebody and warhead so the missile would fit the Tornado Frazer Nash launchers. Super TEMP was a much improved missile used first in Gulf war 1 in 1991. First major difference is the colour. AIM7E was always painted white, Skyflash was always Light aircraft grey. The Skyflash forebody had four longtitudinal proximity sensor strips just behind the radome. Early Skyflash used the same motor, warhead and wings /fins as the Aim7E. Later super TEMP Skyflash had a improved motor, and can be differentiated by the fin mounts at the rear, AIM7E had mounting blocks for the fins, the super TEMPS had aerodynamic blending around the mounts, and around the rear of the side wiring ducts. The superTEMPS had thinner wings and the wing base was painted white to differentiate. Selwyn 5 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dolphin38 Posted November 15, 2021 Share Posted November 15, 2021 These might help Sparrow Sparrow by Phillip Wilmshurst, on Flickr Skyflash Skyflash 1 by Phillip Wilmshurst, on Flickr 3 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selwyn Posted November 15, 2021 Share Posted November 15, 2021 2 hours ago, dolphin38 said: These might help Sparrow Sparrow by Phillip Wilmshurst, on Flickr Skyflash Skyflash 1 by Phillip Wilmshurst, on Flickr In fact this "Skyflash" missile image is actually a hybrid for display use. The RAF did not buy training Skyflash they just repainted the Sparrow Practice rounds Gloss Light aircraft grey. The live skyflash was matt Light aircraft grey. this picture is rear end gloss LA Grey painted sparrow, and live LA Grey (matt) forebody. The proximity sensors are missing off this forebody. You can see the four flat plain surfaces where they were fitted. superTEMP Skyflash Selwyn 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junglierating Posted November 15, 2021 Share Posted November 15, 2021 5 hours ago, Selwyn said: It depends on the time period. First Skyflash was used only on Phantom. The Tornado Embodied Modification Package (TEMP) missiles were used on Phantom/Tornado F2/3, main visual difference on TEMP was cut outs on the missile forebody and warhead so the missile would fit the Tornado Frazer Nash launchers. Super TEMP was a much improved missile used first in Gulf war 1 in 1991. First major difference is the colour. AIM7E was always painted white, Skyflash was always Light aircraft grey. The Skyflash forebody had four longtitudinal proximity sensor strips just behind the radome. Early Skyflash used the same motor, warhead and wings /fins as the Aim7E. Later super TEMP Skyflash had a improved motor, and can be differentiated by the fin mounts at the rear, AIM7E had mounting blocks for the fins, the super TEMPS had aerodynamic blending around the mounts, and around the rear of the side wiring ducts. The superTEMPS had thinner wings and the wing base was painted white to differentiate. Selwyn Wow 👏😮 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parrahs Posted November 16, 2021 Author Share Posted November 16, 2021 So with the front ends there being what I'm sorta after (I'm building a Viggen, thus no Tornado-specific modifications) I fired up an image editor... And it seems the nose cone hasn't changed to a meaningful degree, and the difference I have between Eduard and Kit-supplied missiles are down to the makers and not the subject. Exactly what I needed to know, thanks everyone! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paramedic Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 RB 71s are not necessarily the same colours as British Skyflashes. https://www.robotmuseum.se/ROBOT/Robothistorik/10_Jakt/ARM_rb_71.htm https://www.aef.se/Flygvapnet/Notiser/Robot_71_Notis.htm https://www.aef.se/Flygvapnet/Notiser/Robot71/Robot71_Notis2.htm http://docplayer.se/114152232-Minnen-fran-anskaffningen-av-rb-71-skyflash-rolf-nordstrom-sida-1-6.html But you have probably seen those? Could always make blind ones (green).. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selwyn Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 14 minutes ago, Parrahs said: So with the front ends there being what I'm sorta after (I'm building a Viggen, thus no Tornado-specific modifications) I fired up an image editor... And it seems the nose cone hasn't changed to a meaningful degree, and the difference I have between Eduard and Kit-supplied missiles are down to the makers and not the subject. Exactly what I needed to know, thanks everyone! IIRC the Swedish Skyflash were painted green and had a black radome. Selwyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve McArthur Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 1 hour ago, Selwyn said: IIRC the Swedish Skyflash were painted green and had a black radome. Selwyn Green colored weapons in Swedish service are inert or training rounds. They can also be blue. similar to other countries. Pictures of active weapons being carried are rare out of Sweden, especially in the Cold War timeframe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selwyn Posted November 16, 2021 Share Posted November 16, 2021 2 hours ago, Steve McArthur said: Green colored weapons in Swedish service are inert or training rounds. They can also be blue. similar to other countries. Pictures of active weapons being carried are rare out of Sweden, especially in the Cold War timeframe. Yes green hazard bands on swedish weapons indicate practice, but this was an overall green colour (different shade of green to that used to indicate practice) to match the green camoflage on the Viggens. I think they were repinted grey when the viggen fleet went overall grey coloured Selwyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now