dromia Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 I am Dedicated vacuum form builder as back in the day I found that the injection kits needed as much filling and sanding as the vacuum formed ones and there were more interesting types vacuum formed so that was my chosen route. However having been persuaded to build Tamiya's P-38 I was suitably impressed by the fit and engineering and it was the first injection model I made that went together as I always felt an injection kit should. So I am now tempted by the impending new Tamiya release of the Phantom II. The Phantom is one of the few jets that floats my boat, however the version seem to be predominately if not exclusively US navy schemes which variations of grey and crass loud squadron trim definitely sinks my boat. So did the "B" ever wear more interestingly camouflagesque colours? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creepy Pete Posted July 8, 2021 Share Posted July 8, 2021 You could do it as a US Navy F-4G. They had some interesting camo jobs, and I suspect, as a vac form builder, you'll be able to do the small mods needed. https://theaviationgeekclub.com/remembering-u-s-navy-f-4g-phantom-perform-automatic-carrier-landings 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Bryon Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 ...and decals for the F-4G are available here: https://www.hannants.co.uk/product/KW148095?result-token=mqdW1. Not the best quality decals, but they look okay enough. Jon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alt-92 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 CtA (Cut then Add) have done them in 1/48 as well. Look for the "welcome to the jungle' sheet no.4. Not suitable for the F-4B, but they also do some alternate schemes used with F-4s like the Ferris ones and the late TPS ones just before decommissioning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RMP2 Posted July 9, 2021 Share Posted July 9, 2021 @dromia Would conversion to the C or EC models be an option? As far as I can make out from a look in the World Air Power Journals "Phantom Spirit Of The Skies" Book - externally at least they are very similar with just a few variations in antennas and a bulge above and below the wings to take the larger/wider wheels and tyres. The inboard wing pylons would need to be swapped or modified from the pointy Navy type to the rounded USAF type too, but they would likely be found available from someones spares on here I would expect. They flew with the USAF in the South East Asia (SEA) camo scheme and the EC versions were used as the first Wild Weasel Phantoms which gives another weapons option if thats your thing? Failing that, are you sure the Hasegawa offerings are not what you are looking for? They are far from bad by my humble standards, the major gripe being the blanked intakes but FOD covers are one way to "fix" that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dromia Posted July 13, 2021 Author Share Posted July 13, 2021 Thank you all for the insights. I had seen the F-4G scheme as I also have the "World Air Power Spirit in the Skies" book. However I have insufficient detail as to what the changes needed actually look like, The radar reflector retractable installation is this just a panel lines job when retracted or is the some shape to the panel, Also what other changes is visible as the mostly sound internal or am I being just too optimistic. The Hasegawa version isn't really an option as I have had bad experiences in the past with their products and I don't want to do any conversion work on the new Tamiya F-4, I just want to build it and finish it to experience the engineering, fit and no filler. Just don't like the Navy schemes. When I do get round to building the Phantom version of my choice it will be the F-4K FG.Mk 1. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 On 7/9/2021 at 12:00 PM, RMP2 said: @dromia Would conversion to the C or EC models be an option? As far as I can make out from a look in the World Air Power Journals "Phantom Spirit Of The Skies" Book - externally at least they are very similar with just a few variations in antennas and a bulge above and below the wings to take the larger/wider wheels and tyres. The inboard wing pylons would need to be swapped or modified from the pointy Navy type to the rounded USAF type too, but they would likely be found available from someones spares on here I would expect. They flew with the USAF in the South East Asia (SEA) camo scheme and the EC versions were used as the first Wild Weasel Phantoms which gives another weapons option if thats your thing? Failing that, are you sure the Hasegawa offerings are not what you are looking for? They are far from bad by my humble standards, the major gripe being the blanked intakes but FOD covers are one way to "fix" that. There's more than those changes. Bulged wings Different wheels Rear cockpit differences The B uses a refuelling probe on the right side of the forward fuselage, the C uses a receptacle on the spine. Inner wing pylons different If you really want a USAF F-4 then go for the ZM F-4C or D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exdraken Posted July 13, 2021 Share Posted July 13, 2021 32 minutes ago, Stephen said: If you really want a USAF F-4 then go for the ZM F-4C or D. Or take the Academy (or Eduard Special) or wait some time (years) Or even the Hasegawa Phantoms are all great kits! No need to butcher up a perfectly fine Tamiya model Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan B Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 13 hours ago, dromia said: However I have insufficient detail as to what the changes needed actually look like, The radar reflector retractable installation is this just a panel lines job when retracted or is the some shape to the panel, Looking at the photos of them on the deck of the Kitty Hawk I don't see any external differences from the F-4B at all. One thing that is obvious though is that the wing drop tanks are the earlier style with the flanges running along the centreline on each side of the tanks (which are a slightly different shape too IIRC). If I was building the G I'd happily go with the Tamiya kit and an aftermarket decal set and leave it at that. Duncan B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dromia Posted July 14, 2021 Author Share Posted July 14, 2021 Thank you for that, it is also my inclination, "twill no doubt be close enough for crofting work. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tempestfan Posted July 14, 2021 Share Posted July 14, 2021 If you don' t like loud USN (or MC) markings, then you could do an early F-110 - same basic paint job as the Navy, though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dromia Posted August 6, 2021 Author Share Posted August 6, 2021 (edited) I have decided to go with the G version. I now have the Kits World transfer sheet, not at all of good quality but the few transfers I need from it means 'twill suffice. I have found a a nice profile of 150642 Black Lions USS Kittyhawk, 1965. Page 123 Wings of Fame volume 1, part of a very appropriate article for the new Tamiya kit, "Navy Phantoms in Vietnam". The green was supposed to be a patchy finish over the original grey so should give a lot of latitude for finish, sort of contrived "weathering'. Edited August 7, 2021 by dromia Apostrophes. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creepy Pete Posted August 6, 2021 Share Posted August 6, 2021 This might be of help then http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2017/08/f-4-phantom-acls-radar-reflector.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dromia Posted August 6, 2021 Author Share Posted August 6, 2021 That is so helpful, oft read about but first time seen. Thank you very much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Bryon Posted August 7, 2021 Share Posted August 7, 2021 16 hours ago, dromia said: I have decided to go with the G version. I now have the Kits World transfer sheet, not at all of good quality but the few transfers I need from it means 'twill suffice. I have the same plan and I am equally disappointed in the quality of the decal sheet. Not really acceptable, but it will have to do... Jon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan B Posted August 7, 2021 Share Posted August 7, 2021 17 hours ago, Creepy Pete said: This might be of help then http://tailspintopics.blogspot.com/2017/08/f-4-phantom-acls-radar-reflector.html That's a really useful photo, it confirms that the rectangular door just behind the radome was for the reflector. Should just be a simple scribing job (unless you want to build the reflector of course) if the Tamiya kit doesn't have that particular door already moulded in. Duncan B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dromia Posted August 7, 2021 Author Share Posted August 7, 2021 On the kit parts R3 slightly tapered panel fits onto R5 fuselage nose underside. This is the location of the reflector but I cannot reconcile if it is the exact shape and position of the reflector in the photo graph, there is another similar panel engraved between part R3 and the nose wheel well. I think that panel is visible on the photo so it looks like part R3 is the location and the panel in the photo does seem to have the isosceles trapezoid shape of part R3. Tamiya has included the reflector cover panel, or the reflector was fitted into an existing panel or it is all wishful thinking on my part. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dromia Posted August 7, 2021 Author Share Posted August 7, 2021 If it is the reflector panel then I think that I will fabricate the reflector and show it down. If the panel and its cavity is correct then I will have a base line for getting the reflector measurements from the photo. After all 'twas the reflector that was the visible difference 'tween a "B" and a "G" so appropriate to show it methinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
72modeler Posted August 7, 2021 Share Posted August 7, 2021 That is one weird, complex little bit of origami! I have learned something new today about USN Phantoms, thanks to all of you! Mike I would think that the big flat nose gear fairing door with the approach lights on it could have been used as a radar reflector, or is there something about what the retractable reflector is made of that makes it work? (As Butterfly McQueen said in Gone with the Wind, "Lawsy, Miss Scarlett- I don' know nuthin' 'bout birthin' no babies!") @corsaircorp (The tunnel's almost finished- do I take a left or right at the Channel? The Flight from the Naughty Corner is going to make The Great Escape look like a walk in the park!) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan B Posted August 8, 2021 Share Posted August 8, 2021 22 hours ago, dromia said: On the kit parts R3 slightly tapered panel fits onto R5 fuselage nose underside. This is the location of the reflector but I cannot reconcile if it is the exact shape and position of the reflector in the photo graph, there is another similar panel engraved between part R3 and the nose wheel well. I think that panel is visible on the photo so it looks like part R3 is the location and the panel in the photo does seem to have the isosceles trapezoid shape of part R3. Tamiya has included the reflector cover panel, or the reflector was fitted into an existing panel or it is all wishful thinking on my part. The tapered panel is an aerial or radio transparent panel of some sort (sorry, wrong trade group!). From the drawings I saw for the Reflector panel it is between that aerial and the radome and is rectangular. Duncan B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dromia Posted August 8, 2021 Author Share Posted August 8, 2021 On the kit there are only two panels 'tween the forward wheel well and the radom, both of which appear isosceles trapezoid in shape with the forward panel having a more acute angle to its sides. The photograph appears to show the panel being of trapezoid shape rather than square, but that could just be focal length distortion of the camera. I would like to see that drawing you are referring to. From the drawing in Creepy Pete's link it looks like it fits into the forward panel next to the radom part R3 on the lit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tailspin Turtle Posted August 8, 2021 Share Posted August 8, 2021 22 hours ago, 72modeler said: That is one weird, complex little bit of origami! I have learned something new today about USN Phantoms, thanks to all of you! Mike I would think that the big flat nose gear fairing door with the approach lights on it could have been used as a radar reflector, or is there something about what the retractable reflector is made of that makes it work? (As Butterfly McQueen said in Gone with the Wind, "Lawsy, Miss Scarlett- I don' know nuthin' 'bout birthin' no babies!") @corsaircorp (The tunnel's almost finished- do I take a left or right at the Channel? The Flight from the Naughty Corner is going to make The Great Escape look like a walk in the park!) A corner reflector provides a much better return than the door, necessary for the position accuracy of the approach guidance: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corner_reflector 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now