matthies Posted June 13, 2021 Share Posted June 13, 2021 Hi... I have a query regarding WCdr Tait's Lancaster, EE146, KC-D from the Tirpitz raids in 1944. Did the aircraft have it's front turret intact for these raids? I'm confused because there's a pewter model I've seen online with the turret removed and the space blanked over, which would make sense as a weight-saving measure, also a print of the aircraft in the same configuration from another company.. However, I note that Mark Postlethwaite has depicted the same Lanc on the final raid, Operation Catechism, with the turret intact. I know he researches his subjects thoroughly, so which is correct - turret or no turret? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyot Posted June 14, 2021 Share Posted June 14, 2021 The nose turret was retained,.... the mid upper was removed in order to install extra tanks in the fuselage. They had larger bomb doors too for the 12,000lb bomb. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stever219 Posted June 14, 2021 Share Posted June 14, 2021 24 minutes ago, tonyot said: The nose turret was retained,.... the mid upper was removed in order to install extra tanks in the fuselage. They had larger bomb doors too for the 12,000lb bomb. According to Paul Brickhill in The Dambusters the rear turret came off in order to install the long cylindrical (ex Wellingtin) tanks and was then reinstated. Getting those tanks in through the dorsal turret aperture would have been every fitter's very worst nightmare. The dorsal turret came off and stayed off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex Gordon Posted June 14, 2021 Share Posted June 14, 2021 G'day Matthies, As Tony says the nose turret was retained on the KC aircraft,the YZ,s had further reaching weight saving measures.The mid upper turret wasn't always removed; from https://www.thisdayinaviation.com/tag/tallboy/ from http://www.dambusters.org.uk/after-the-dams/raids/tirpitz/ from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No._617_Squadron_RAF Hope this helps. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyot Posted June 14, 2021 Share Posted June 14, 2021 (edited) 3 hours ago, stever219 said: According to Paul Brickhill in The Dambusters the rear turret came off in order to install the long cylindrical (ex Wellingtin) tanks and was then reinstated. Getting those tanks in through the dorsal turret aperture would have been every fitter's very worst nightmare. The dorsal turret came off and stayed off. I mean that the tanks were located in the fuselage where the mid upper turret used to be,..... yes of course the rear turret would have to be removed to install them. The 617 Sqn Lancs also had the `special' bomb sight. Edited June 14, 2021 by tonyot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matthies Posted June 14, 2021 Author Share Posted June 14, 2021 Thank you folks for the prompt answers, I was aware of the mid-upper being removed to accommodate the Wellington overload tanks and also the front turret removal on the 'Grand Slam' Lancs' ...but I'm intrigued by the research that led to a model and a print of EE146 with no front turret, because I can't find anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now