Jump to content

1/48 Airfix TSR-2


Recommended Posts

G'day Matt,

 

I wasn't going to mention this as it looked like you had already applied paint but the 'hump' transition on the upper fuselage is a little too stark, it should have a more gradual blend into the surrounding area. This issue is also manifest on the 1/72 kit but being a smaller scale is easier to sand and blend in. I am not sure what sort of appetite you have to remediate but since you will now be sanding the upper surfaces anyway this may be something to consider -or not, In any case please keep up the excellent work so that the rest of us numpties  can copy all the fixes (and avoid any pitfalls) when we get around to this kit,

 

cheers,

 

Pappy

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
On 13/11/2021 at 21:50, Pappy said:

I wasn't going to mention this as it looked like you had already applied paint but the 'hump' transition on the upper fuselage is a little too stark, it should have a more gradual blend into the surrounding area. This issue is also manifest on the 1/72 kit but being a smaller scale is easier to sand and blend in. I am not sure what sort of appetite you have to remediate but since you will now be sanding the upper surfaces anyway this may be something to consider -or not, In any case please keep up the excellent work so that the rest of us numpties  can copy all the fixes (and avoid any pitfalls) when we get around to this kit,

Thanks Pappy. I think at this stage of the build I will just have to live with it...🙂

 

This build has been neglected for the whole of the winter, as I want to spray it using rattle cans and have been waiting for warmer weather! I think that moment could be nearly upon me, so I have returned to prepping the model. It was left with a poor finish, due to me spraying the paint too heavily last year and causing it to run. The excess was sanded back, but some of the surface detail was buried under paint:

 

s1.jpg

 

No other option other than to re-scribe the affected areas! I read a top tip on this website regarding using dyno tape, so duly purchased some especially for this job. It has a good thickness to guide the scriber and is sticky enough not to slip:

 

s2.jpg

 

A few minutes later and the panel lines were more uniform again:

 

s3.jpg

 

I will give the model a gentle sanding and then hopefully get the paint applied on the next warm day.

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

The warm day has finally arrived, gloss white was applied and final assembly is underway. First I attached the exhausts, then glued a tailplane into position using my Vulcan as a support to hold the piece at the correct angle:

 

tp1.jpg

 

The other tailplane and fin will follow, then it's just airbrakes and undercarriage to finish the build.👍

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
On 17/05/2022 at 06:49, DonH said:

Looking good, if a little lopsided :)

Thanks Don and sorry for the delay - I wasn't ignoring you, I was ignoring the entire build!

 

Hopefully not so lopsided now a few more bits have been added:

 

wh.jpg

 

The few remaining components are now getting some attention. The first challenge is removing them cleanly from the sprue - those attachment points are huge: 

 

sgs.jpg

 

The airbrakes need assembling too:

 

abs.jpg

 

And I have no idea what these bits are for and cannot see these part numbers on the instructions either:

 

3637.jpg

 

Hopefully a final push will see this one over the finishing line soon.👍

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they are bracing rods for the undercarriage wheel struts. They were added to XR220 due to the shimmying that Roland Beaumont experienced when he landed XR219 at the end of its first flight.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On 15/08/2022 at 09:44, Tinners said:

I think they are bracing rods for the undercarriage wheel struts. They were added to XR220 due to the shimmying that Roland Beaumont experienced when he landed XR219 at the end of its first flight.

Thanks Tinners and apologies for the delay in replying… other builds have been stealing my attention!

 

As I’m building XR220, I will do some more research on these braces.👍

 

I think I’ve finished spraying all the remaining bits, so will get decals on next before adding all the fragile pieces!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just a quick update, as I've only managed a few small jobs on this model. This was the state of play a week ago:

 

prtr.jpg

 

I have painted the actuators for the airbrakes. Instead of Alclad, I cheated again and used a chrome pen:

 

rams.jpg

 

These will be attached at the very end off the build, due to the likelihood of getting broken off!

 

I have also painted the wheel assemblies:

 

ucb.jpg

 

And started the decals:

 

ron.jpg

 

These are not a strong point on the kit, being very brittle and fragmenting frequently. However, I am slowly beating them into submission!

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Over six months have passed, so I thought I should really resume work on this one! 😆

 

It was taken down from the shelf of doom and the dust removed... I decided to continue with the decals, as these are fair easier to fix before all the fragile bits get glued on!

First the gear doors had a few additions:

 

st1.jpg

 

Followed by the nose:

 

st2.jpg

 

And the underside:

 

st3.jpg

 

These decals were quite brittle and the colour ran on some of the pink ones. However, they have added some good detail to the model. There has been a degree of silvering, but I'm hoping the varnish will hide most of this...

 

Time for final assembly! Here are the bits that currently need fixing onto the model:

 

bits.jpg

 

The undercarriage doors were the first parts to get attached, ignoring the instructions which show them wide open... I believe this was from a museum example which had them open for exhibition purposes?

 

usd.jpg

 

The bomb bay doors are just offered up to check the fit. I think I will glue these in the open position and expose the bomb bay.

 

Some painting is required next, to complete the nose gear lights. Then I'll add a few more bits to the model - it's getting there!

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing for seven months then two updates come along on the same day...!! 🚌

 

Due to non-stop rain today, I never managed any spraying. I did however have an enjoyable few minutes though gluing more bits into place - airbrakes and bomb bay doors:

 

ab.jpg

 

The doors are just tacked on at the front, due them being a bit bent... Once the fronts have set, I will persuade the back ends into the correct position and glue those too!

 

Getting closer...!

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Almost done!

The main gear bogies and remaining undercarriage doors were attached:

 

uc1.jpg

 

One of the inaccuracies of this kit is the main gear - it is splayed out far too much, as can be seen in this shot:

 

uc5.jpg

 

The tailplanes were also re-attached after an unfortunate 'dropping' incident about a year ago:

 

uc2.jpg

 

And the canopy unmasked. There was a significant amount of paint seepage:

 

c1.jpg

 

Some work with a cocktail stick and thinners helped remove the excess, then it was time for a Flory wash:

 

f1.jpg

 

f2.jpg

 

At least 99% of this will be removed. The aircraft was not in use for that long, so probably did not get overly grubby. However, I suspect a pristine white finish was not representative either!

 

A final picture, showing the diagonal bracing strut mentioned by @Tinners previously in this thread, added to XR220 to dampen undercarriage vibrations:

 

uc4.jpg

 

Talking of undercarriage vibrations, this video might be of interest, showing a firm landing during the testing phase:

 

 

Once the model is cleaned up I have two more bits to glue on, then it will be the RFI!

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking good!

 

I think you’re going to need to reinforce the main undercarriage joint - mine looked okay for a short time but quickly began to sag. A metal pin (a paper lip I think) sorted it on my second build.

 

Graham

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Back in the Saddle said:

alking of undercarriage vibrations, this video might be of interest, showing a firm landing during the testing phase:

Excellent video clip.  I winced when I saw the landing ....... ouch! 

 

Bit of background in support of the need for the bracing.   Earlier in my career at Warton I did a lot of simulation and calculation work for undercarriage loads on EAP and Typhoon and although we didn't retain any data from TSR2 (and it was well before my time), that aircraft's problems were well known to us.  In fact we did unearth a video taken during the investigation to try and understand and then sort the vibration problems.  The camera was placed in the u/c bay looking downwards and during landings you could see the u/c leg bending back and forth rather alarmingly - despite looking quite chunky it was relatively delicate for such a large aircraft.  It wasn't a "traditional" shimmy (think unruly supermarket trolley wheels), rather it was fore/aft leg bending triggered by the wheel spin-up drag forces on touchdown.     Unfortunately, the video was misplaced again.  If I recall correctly the frequency of vibration was quite low (8-10Hz) and hence very uncomfortable for aircrew to experience.  I seem to remember that eyeballs could be particularly affected as they are prone to resonate in that frequency range 🤔     :shocked:

 

Hope that wasn't too boring.

 

Cheers

 

Rob

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Zephyr91 said:

Excellent video clip.  I winced when I saw the landing ....... ouch! 

 

Bit of background in support of the need for the bracing.   Earlier in my career at Warton I did a lot of simulation and calculation work for undercarriage loads on EAP and Typhoon and although we didn't retain any data from TSR2 (and it was well before my time), that aircraft's problems were well known to us.  In fact we did unearth a video taken during the investigation to try and understand and then sort the vibration problems.  The camera was placed in the u/c bay looking downwards and during landings you could see the u/c leg bending back and forth rather alarmingly - despite looking quite chunky it was relatively delicate for such a large aircraft.  It wasn't a "traditional" shimmy (think unruly supermarket trolley wheels), rather it was fore/aft leg bending triggered by the wheel spin-up drag forces on touchdown.     Unfortunately, the video was misplaced again.  If I recall correctly the frequency of vibration was quite low (8-10Hz) and hence very uncomfortable for aircrew to experience.  I seem to remember that eyeballs could be particularly affected as they are prone to resonate in that frequency range 🤔     :shocked:

 

Hope that wasn't too boring.

 

Cheers

 

Rob

Rob

if you go about five minutes into this clip, is it the film you’re thinking of?

 

Graham

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, GrahamS said:

f you go about five minutes into this clip, is it the film you’re thinking of?

Brilliant.  I think there was more than that available, but yes!!   Beamont even confirms my memory of the eyeball resonance.   The undercarriage excited modes of vibration that transmitted through the airframe and (again from memory) I think theer was a fuselage mode around that frequency as well - which is what he would have felt.

 

Thanks for sharing that.

 

Sorry for the diversion Matt, but we nerds need a fix now and then!! :rofl:

 

Not my era of modelling, but a subject dear to my heart for its industry heritage significance and engineering "lessons learnt". 

 

Excellent build of an awsome aeroplane.  Looking forward to the final bits coming together.

 

cheers

 

Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Zephyr91 said:

Sorry for the diversion Matt

These diversions are most welcome, my inner nerd is thoroughly enjoying learning more about the history of this beast!

 

Removing the Flory is very much a WIP and I will hopefully post an update soon. Suffice to say, removing it from a satin finish is far harder than removing it from a gloss finish! However it is gradually returning back to a cleaner condition, albeit taking much more effort than expected!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She's looking great. Don't worry too much about the excess undercarriage splay, she still looks the part. The fix is very complicated and long winded and I am in two minds as to whether I will repeat the exercise when I build this kit again.

 

Martian 👽

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/05/2023 at 18:26, Martian said:

She's looking great. Don't worry too much about the excess undercarriage splay, she still looks the part. The fix is very complicated and long winded and I am in two minds as to whether I will repeat the exercise when I build this kit again.

Thanks Martian, I'm hoping the splay won't be too noticeable...👍

 

In other news, the Flory wash has finally been removed. Some Tamiya fine polishing compound was used to remove the more stubborn stains...😉

 

A few pictures showing the process, starting with the filthy stage:

 

fly1.jpg

 

I then removed the worse of the this dirt, leaving just a few areas that needed additional scrubbing:

 

fly2.jpg

 

Moist cotton buds (and the polishing compound!) finally left it looking like this:

 

fly3.jpg

 

Hopefully appropriately dirty in areas around the panels and in the recesses, but suitably clean in all other areas? I couldn't find any decent reference photos showing the aircraft whilst it was in use, so much of this is guesswork...

 

The same process, showing the nose before cleaning:

 

fly4.jpg

 

Note the SLUF in the background, which is part of a current GB and a fun little kit to build!

 

Finally a photo of the nose once the Flory had been removed:

 

fly5.jpg

 

The whole aircraft has been cleaned, a bit more Flory added and removed in a few areas, then the final aerial and probe were added. I also had to re-attach the tailplane for a third time, having knocked it off again...! :doh:

 

It is now finished! Hopefully I will get the RFI done soon...🤞

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks good to me Matt.

I remember having to do a little surgery on the undercarriage of my 1/72 version to reduce the "splay" on the main legs - not sure which kit came first but it seems both large and small versions have the same problem.

 

Pete

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PeterB said:

Looks good to me Matt.

I remember having to do a little surgery on the undercarriage of my 1/72 version to reduce the "splay" on the main legs - not sure which kit came first but it seems both large and small versions have the same problem.

Thanks Pete. I think removing the bogies and fixing new metal axles at right angles to the ground (not the strut) will improve things immensely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/05/2023 at 13:53, Back in the Saddle said:

(although I will be re-visiting the undercarriage at some point to make improvements!)

I suppose, rather than a difficult looking fix (no problem to you I'm sure), you could just say it happened due to the heavy landing shown in the video above!  :whistle: 

 

looks great

 

Rob

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Back in the Saddle said:

Thanks Pete. I think removing the bogies and fixing new metal axles at right angles to the ground (not the strut) will improve things immensely.

I seem to recall that I had read a review which highlighted the problem and that on my 1/72 build I cut away part of the upper leg and maybe fuselage to allow the legs to go on with less of an angle. That automatically corrected the sit of the bogies

DSC05644-crop

I guess it is a bit too late for you to do that now so adjusting the bogies is the only option.

 

Pete

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, PeterB said:

I seem to recall that I had read a review which highlighted the problem and that on my 1/72 build I cut away part of the upper leg and maybe fuselage to allow the legs to go on with less of an angle. That automatically corrected the sit of the bogies

DSC05644-crop

I guess it is a bit too late for you to do that now so adjusting the bogies is the only option.

 

Pete

Smart guy PeterB, I liked your solution and I will try the same way.

Thanks 

SouthViper 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SouthViper said:

Smart guy PeterB, I liked your solution and I will try the same way.

Thanks 

SouthViper 

Can't take any credit having  read about it in a review as I said. Bit nerve racking and you have to make sure you don't take too much off, but it does work.

 

Later!

Actually, I think this may be where I read about the legs, here on Brit Modeller not actually a review. I actually adjusted both the legs and the kit bay wall - it does not take too much! Navy Bird was using a replacement resin bay unlike me!

 

Very long thread and full of info.

 

Pete

 

Edited by PeterB
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...