noelh Posted April 29, 2021 Share Posted April 29, 2021 I too am disappointed at the softness of the detail compared to other manufacturers. Particularly in a brand new 21st century tool. However it won't stop me buying it and I have to say perhaps it's not something that would even be noticed on a finished model. But I'm glad there are no showstoppers as such. Plus I've always fancied an RAF Sabre. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabrejet Posted April 30, 2021 Author Share Posted April 30, 2021 10 hours ago, Tony Edmundson said: Quick, post some more pics to get back on subject Tony Well here goes. Couple of shots to show how in-the-field 6-3 leading edges were installed. It looks like they were supplied pre-camouflaged and that the camouflage of the new leading edge didn't always match that of the older wing box. First photo courtesy John Hardwick, of a 71 Sqn machine: And 92 Sqn in the UK. Note the new wingtip (circa 3 inches longer) is apparent on the nearest machine: How's that Tony? 7 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rabbit Leader Posted April 30, 2021 Share Posted April 30, 2021 I quite like that newly painted 6-3 leading edge against the faded paint on the original wing surface, would look quite good on a model. Now we just need to work out which serials were so modified and which were supplied new. Cheers and thanks Duncan... Dave Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selwyn Posted April 30, 2021 Share Posted April 30, 2021 15 hours ago, Sabrejet said: 4 Sqn colour scheme in the kit is correct. Got an image? I would be interested to see this! Selwyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabrejet Posted April 30, 2021 Author Share Posted April 30, 2021 1 hour ago, Sabrejet said: How's that Tony? Note too that the nearest 92 Sqn machine obviously has a replacement flap. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bryanm Posted May 1, 2021 Share Posted May 1, 2021 On 4/25/2021 at 4:29 PM, Sabrejet said: the flashed-over holes for the tank pylons are in the wrong place! They measure approximately 62.75mm from the fuselage centre line, which equates to BP 118 on the real aircraft: this is the outer station for a dual-store wing. The correct location should be BP 99.5, which on the kit is 52.33mm from the centre line. I'm at the stage of marking out where the holes should be - I presumed that the front hole should be the same distance back from the leading edge of part A3 (the lower wing moulding) as the flashed over hole but maybe that isn't right. Perhaps it should be further back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petetasker Posted May 1, 2021 Share Posted May 1, 2021 Have started my kit and got to the stage where I selectively glossed the cockpit for the instrument decals. Applied them and they seemed to settle down nicely. Fully dried I thought I’d give them a quick sealing varnish. Couldn't be bothered with the airbrush so used a hairy stick instead. The detail on the decal basically just smeared off. Not a problem I’ve had before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichG Posted May 1, 2021 Share Posted May 1, 2021 (edited) On 4/27/2021 at 8:22 PM, Giorgio N said: Airfix big advantage is that their kits are widely available in the UK (and in other markets too), something that can't be said for many Asian manufacturers. This alone will likely make this kit pretty succesful. Yep I completely agree. And whilst I do understand some will be disappointed - and the reasons why - also it seems to me that Airfix is in the business of selling their products and know their market pretty well. So they primarily focus on subjects that have a British service history and make them widely available to the average UK modeller (and potentially casual buyer) in their home market. And at a reasonable price for 1/48 scale (I recently paid over £30 each for a couple of 1/72 Chinese "state of the art" kits and over £70 for a 1/48 Japanese one). Airfix make their new kits accurate in outline, reasonably detailed and with superb decals. Bettering the best on the market for a particular model subject or plugging a gap for a paricular sub-type to satisfy advanced modellers would not appear to be a priority. I can't say I've ever had a burning desire to build a Sabre and the variation in wings debate always leaves me cold if I'm honest, but the subject as presented piqued my interest so I have bought the kit. As long as Airfix continue to regularly release great kit subjects to a reasonable standard I, for one, am happy to be a customer. Now when is that 1/48 de Havilland Vampire F.3 due... (interesting to see how this kit stacks up against the competition...? ). Rich Edited May 1, 2021 by RichG 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabrejet Posted May 1, 2021 Author Share Posted May 1, 2021 2 hours ago, bryanm said: I'm at the stage of marking out where the holes should be - I presumed that the front hole should be the same distance back from the leading edge of part A3 (the lower wing moulding) as the flashed over hole but maybe that isn't right. Perhaps it should be further back? No that part is about right: it just needs to be further inboard as a whole. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Whittingham Posted May 1, 2021 Share Posted May 1, 2021 On 4/25/2021 at 3:30 PM, Adam Poultney said: Museum errors seem to be a plague on Airfix's modern kits... And the whole generation of LIDAR scan based kits. They really need to get in a really good expert of each plane they do just to check for these things that someone who has only researched the aircraft in depth for the purpose of the deigning the kit would miss. Similar things are evident on the new Vulcan which is hopefully going to be out in the summer. I agree wholeheartedly, having just built the Hunter 4 kit. Too much reliance on lidar, and not enough checking against photos. TW 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Julien Posted May 3, 2021 Share Posted May 3, 2021 On 30/04/2021 at 08:00, Rabbit Leader said: I quite like that newly painted 6-3 leading edge against the faded paint on the original wing surface, would look quite good on a model. Now we just need to work out which serials were so modified and which were supplied new. Cheers and thanks Duncan... Dave Duncan lists all the serials in his book showing which were delivered with the hard wing and any that were modified. 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabrejet Posted May 3, 2021 Author Share Posted May 3, 2021 @Rabbit Leader: the aircraft which were 6-3-winged from manufacture are (RCAF s/n in parentheses): XB647-XB650 (19854-19857) XB770-XB775 (19858-19863) XB851-XB855 (19864-19868) XB916-XB961 (19803-19848) XB973-XB977 (19849-19853) XB978-XB999 (19869-19890) XD780, XD781 (19801-19802) 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham T Posted May 3, 2021 Share Posted May 3, 2021 1 hour ago, Sabrejet said: @Rabbit Leader: the aircraft which were 6-3-winged from manufacture are (RCAF s/n in parentheses): XB647-XB650 (19854-19857) XB770-XB775 (19858-19863) XB851-XB855 (19864-19868) XB916-XB961 (19803-19848) XB973-XB977 (19849-19853) XB978-XB999 (19869-19890) XD780, XD781 (19801-19802) Super useful! Thanks! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomas Enerdal Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 (edited) Regarding the "soft detail" on recent Airfix kits: The softness/roundness lies in the top surface. By gently sanding down the surface with wet n' dry the detail improves no end, and quickly and simply gets close to Hasegawa standards. The panel lines and rivets are very narrow and sharp closer to their bottom. If varying the level of sanding a little, one gets a very interesting and subtle variation which gives life and interest to the detail. Resulting/remaining panel lines can also be deepened with local scribing in places to give further variation. IMHO, this limited effort gives very rewarding results! See link below, Airfix FR Mk.XIV wing in progress. To appreciate sharpness, consider the pictures level of zoom (It will get a bulge from an Ultracast panel insert. Not seen in this view, it will be modified to a FR.XVIII) TE FR.XVIII wing Edited August 4, 2022 by Tomas Enerdal 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anj4de Posted November 28, 2023 Share Posted November 28, 2023 Hi I just watched a couple (many) reviews and build videos on youtube and I am not impressed. Apart from the usual (cheap) low pressure molding in sub standard molds made in Cheapistan, the cockpit is a pure joke! The seat, or what is meant to be it, a 10 year old one could carve from a piece of soap with better details. The rest of the cockpit also lacks details, it almost reminds me of the Airfix blister packs of my childhood. I do not understand that. I have quite a few newer Airfix kits and while non of them is up to Tamiya or Eduard standards, some of them are really nice. Spitfire Mk1 to 5, P-40B, Defiant, Hurricane, Mustang. And then you have the Sabre or the 109E, with it's trenches and glas part that look like the bottoms of whine bottles. I wonder if Airfix employs someone good in their marketing department? The 109E up until very recently was the most acurate -E outline wise...and if made to high standards could have been a million seller. The same goes for the Sabre, a Hasegawa quality -A model (with John Wayne decals 😉 )would have also sold millions I am sure. No, it has to be a toy like RAF version which is really only interesting for the decals. ) Sorry for the rant... cheers Uwe PS: Toying with the idea of buying a Hawker Hunter, any thoughts on that one? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Edmundson Posted November 29, 2023 Share Posted November 29, 2023 Once you clean up the cockpit area with some aftermarket and a bit of 'modelling'; the Airfix kit does build up into a serious contender against the Hasecademy one. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabrejet Posted November 29, 2023 Author Share Posted November 29, 2023 I'm with Tony: I've built a few now and they build up well. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gingerbob Posted November 29, 2023 Share Posted November 29, 2023 12 hours ago, anj4de said: PS: Toying with the idea of buying a Hawker Hunter, any thoughts on that one? I'd say (actually having an example of each) that the Hunter is somewhat better than the Sabre. It also has the significant difference of having much less competitive alternatives. There are one or two minor tweaks/corrections you might wish to make. I like the Sabre more than I thought I would, but I do think the panel lines are somewhat more heavy-handed than is desirable for the subject. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Selwyn Posted November 29, 2023 Share Posted November 29, 2023 Just finishing one up as we speak, in the middle of decalling (4 Sqn RAF but not the boring in kit scheme). It's gone together well and looks the business Very happy with the result! Selwyn 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canberraman Posted November 29, 2023 Share Posted November 29, 2023 I must say I generally enjoyed building the 1/48 Airfix Sabre, the only problem I had, which was of my own choice, was to replace the kit's 6:3 wing leading edges for the particular slatted wing machine I was asked to build. Mark 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alt-92 Posted November 30, 2023 Share Posted November 30, 2023 On 11/28/2023 at 8:34 PM, anj4de said: whine bottles [....] Sorry for the rant... cheers Ok, you had me giggling for a bit there I did take advantage of the Black Friday discount on the Sabre - at half the price I'll deal with it. Re: Hunter - the latest FGA.9 box has some extra bits & correction info. Maybe that satisfies your desires a bit better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now