alex Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 I think it depends on the seats; the H225 is generally a Super Puma/Cougar. If I remember correctly, in the military seating configuration it can carry 16 equipped soldiers. If you want to put in more people, you need an "airliner-like" seating, which makes loading/unloading quite cumbersome. So, 28 troops is not realistic for tactical use. Alex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EwenS Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 Well the Airbus blurb says 20 in “crashworthy seats” and up to 28 in “high density configuration” with a layout that looks nothing like an “airliner layout”. Regardless, it is still 3t heavier than the competition. https://www.airbus.com/en/products-services/helicopters/military-helicopters/h225m/h225m-technical-information 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alex Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 Thanks, it looks like they really changed the layout and added more seats. Looks like the rear part has been lowered to add some cabin space, too. I was working on the Cougar in my military service, and we had a layout for 16 soldiers. They have a picture of the 19-pax-layout, I'm still wondering how they can put 28 people in that cabin: https://www.airbus.com/en/products-services/helicopters/civil-helicopters/h225/h225-technical-information Must be quite crowded then. Especially if you take soldiers with relevant equipment and weapons. ALex Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stever219 Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 On 3/31/2021 at 7:14 AM, wellsprop said: That would just be paying to switch from one out of date aircraft to another. The requirement would still exist to upgrade to a modernised aircraft. A bit like the RAF's Rivet Joint purchase then.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stever219 Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 On 4/16/2021 at 12:40 AM, junglierating said: Agree 20 years late. Was Sk optimised for sea level hmm Afghanistan would say not ? "SeaKing": you don't find many seas up mountains.🤣🤣🤣🤣 Seriously though, for a helicopter designed for a maritime environment the SeaKing and its crews have acquitted themselves very well in UK servicexal9ne over the years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellsprop Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 45 minutes ago, stever219 said: "SeaKing": you don't find many seas up mountains.🤣🤣🤣🤣 Seriously though, for a helicopter designed for a maritime environment the SeaKing and its crews have acquitted themselves very well in UK servicexal9ne over the years. Gotta agree there! The Sea King did a damn good job and carried on serving even when it really was a bit tired. The poor aircraft had so many extra bits bolted onto it that it became an awful lot heavier and a lot less aerodynamic! The Sea King and Lynx (much like the 101 and 159 that succeeded them) are designed as maritime platforms designed to operate in the North Atlantic, closing the GIUK gap to the Soviet navy - a job they all do very well. The AW149 is quite a departure from this design philosophy, it builds on the philosophy of the incredibly successful AW139 (which the USA has chosen to replace Hueys) and incorporates a lot of technological development. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exdraken Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 2 hours ago, wellsprop said: The AW149 is quite a departure from this design philosophy, it builds on the philosophy of the incredibly successful AW139 Could you elaborate abut what that US in detail? Curious, but not very knowledgeable in this field... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellsprop Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 51 minutes ago, exdraken said: Could you elaborate abut what that US in detail? Curious, but not very knowledgeable in this field... Without going into deep detail, the design shares a lot in common with the AW139, it can be considered part of the same family (i.e. much like the Airbus A320 series). The AW139 has had worldwide success and is noted for its reliability and ease of maintenance - moreover, it can be easily configured to suit an intended role. The AW149 has 4 large displays and a very clean cockpit (especially the overhead panel), this increases the pilots situational awareness and reduces their workload. Compared with the more crowded and busier S-70i cockpit Another massive change is the AFCS (Automatic Flight Control System) in the AW149 is significantly more modern and advanced than the Blackhawks. Generally, comparing the AW149 with the Blackhawk is similar to comparing an Airbus A320 with a Boeing 737. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewolf Posted May 21, 2022 Share Posted May 21, 2022 On 15/06/2021 at 21:55, wellsprop said: https://www.flightglobal.com/helicopters/airbus-helicopters-showcases-westernised-h175-as-uk-puma-replacement-hots-up/144144.article Airbus Helicopters are beginning their marketing pitch. Interestingly they are claiming they can make the aircraft in the UK, although I seriously doubt Airbus Helicopters UK designs/makes anywhere near as much of the H175M as the Leonardo Helicopters UK designs/makes of the AW149. I feel politics and supporting UK industry will have a big role in the final deicision. Personally, I believe if the UK wants to support the UK helicopter industry, then there is only one company that can be chosen. If the UK wants to give our armed forces the best option is Blackhawk hands down.... andthe Army wants Blackhawk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slater Posted May 21, 2022 Author Share Posted May 21, 2022 Well, Blackhawk has the advantage of being around so long that all of the bugs have probably long since been sorted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seahawk Posted May 21, 2022 Share Posted May 21, 2022 20 minutes ago, Whitewolf said: If the UK wants to give our armed forces the best option is Blackhawk hands down.... andthe Army wants Blackhawk That's your problem: if. Governments (of whatever colour) are only interested in doing the minimum they can get past the voters (who overwhelmingly don't care at all) at the cheapest possible price. How else can one explain recent ludicrous penny-packet procurements (Wedgetail, Type 26)? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitewolf Posted May 21, 2022 Share Posted May 21, 2022 6 hours ago, Seahawk said: That's your problem: if. Governments (of whatever colour) are only interested in doing the minimum they can get past the voters (who overwhelmingly don't care at all) at the cheapest possible price. How else can one explain recent ludicrous penny-packet procurements (Wedgetail, Type 26)? Getting the best is always a problem as like you say penny pinching governments always seek the cheapest deal, although in this case that would actually be Blackhawk with the bonus that we already have a good number of pilots trained to fly it after exchange postings with the US. E7 is currently the best AEW aircraft, but we need 5 as opposed to the 3. Type 26, yes we need more than 8.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slater Posted May 21, 2022 Author Share Posted May 21, 2022 Weren't Sweden's Blackhawks only intended to be a gap-filler until their preferred aircraft was ready? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellsprop Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 On 21/05/2022 at 20:32, Slater said: Weren't Sweden's Blackhawks only intended to be a gap-filler until their preferred aircraft was ready? Not quite, Sweden bought the NH90, which is so terribly unserviceable and delayed that they then bought Blackhawks. Australia did the same. Don't buy an NH90. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agent K Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 On 5/21/2022 at 1:14 PM, Whitewolf said: If the UK wants to give our armed forces the best option is Blackhawk hands down.... andthe Army wants Blackhawk Is it though? and who is "the Army"? the Chiefs of staff, the troops? all? and what about the RAF that will operate and fly it? and it depends of course on your measures to deem what is the best?, it's all subjective........ I guess if you get the RFP right, and be detailed and specific on the requirement for performance, cost, training, operational costs, build offset, maintenance, etc etc etc then the best is what wins that competition, and if it's the Blackhawk then good, if not then good too. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slater Posted May 25, 2022 Author Share Posted May 25, 2022 Well, if you can wait for the Blackhawk's supposed replacement (the Future Long Range Assault Aircraft, prototypes which are flying) you'll get a substantially more capable helicopter. Of course, it's probably priced accordingly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellsprop Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 48 minutes ago, Slater said: Well, if you can wait for the Blackhawk's supposed replacement (the Future Long Range Assault Aircraft, prototypes which are flying) you'll get a substantially more capable helicopter. Of course, it's probably priced accordingly. FLRAA is of pretty much no use to European militaries - no one in Europe is interested in it, tilt-rotors, coaxials with pushers and compound helicopters. The US has a requirement to fly small groups of people, very very long distances, pretty quickly - the US moves loads of airborne troops with vast quantities of blackhawks (as they did in the Iraq war), European militaries simply don't do this, because they don't operate hundreds of helicopters. https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2020/11/20/five-european-allies-sign-on-to-build-natos-next-medium-lift-helicopter/ 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junglierating Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 Blah blah blackhawk the UK didnt want it in the 80/90s so not sure why they might now. In my opinion too much relience on one countries kit is expensive and not always the best solution. Besides whilst performance is of upmost importance so is maintainabilty and the right amount of logistics....trust me buy USA is great but.....the repair loop is enormous. Mind you now we are no longer part of mainland Europe import export controls are an absolute nightmare...just me gobbing off/ fourpennyworth.😁 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Fleming Posted May 25, 2022 Share Posted May 25, 2022 47 minutes ago, junglierating said: Blah blah blackhawk the UK didnt want it in the 80/90s so not sure why they might now. Don't know if the requirement has changed, but the Blackhawk was always too small for the UK requirements. it couldn't carry the number of trooops in a single lift - fine for the US which had plenty of them (and pilots) 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Britman Posted May 31, 2022 Share Posted May 31, 2022 Buy Westland er DaVinci doh! Leonardo. What I meant, buy local. It seems to be a good product.🧥 Keith 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellsprop Posted June 14, 2022 Share Posted June 14, 2022 Poland order the AW149 for their military - assumes 32 aircraft. https://defence24.com/armed-forces/poland-procures-the-aw149-in-its-perkoz-programme 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
junglierating Posted June 14, 2022 Share Posted June 14, 2022 (edited) 44 minutes ago, wellsprop said: Poland order the AW149 for their military - assumes 32 aircraft. https://defence24.com/armed-forces/poland-procures-the-aw149-in-its-perkoz-programme Ooh 5 fully equipped troops ....thats kinda useless then thats not even a section ...even puma can do that ....is that the a/c LHels are pushing for Puma replacement? Edited June 14, 2022 by junglierating Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wellsprop Posted June 17, 2022 Share Posted June 17, 2022 On 14/06/2022 at 17:20, junglierating said: Ooh 5 fully equipped troops ....thats kinda useless then thats not even a section ...even puma can do that ....is that the a/c LHels are pushing for Puma replacement? It is, the AW149 vastly surpasses the 5 fully loaded troops requirement (really vastly). Things like the, avionics, training capability and gearbox dry run times are what really set the AW149 apart from the rest of the competition. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Max Headroom Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 Zombie thread revival. Latest edition of Air Forces Monthly has a piece on this and seems to think the 149 to be the right choice. Trevor 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigel Bunker Posted July 4, 2022 Share Posted July 4, 2022 Doubtless the pennypinchers at MoD are scouring the world for second hand Pumas to replace the RAF's existing Pumas. 😆 If they're cheap they can't be wrong 🤫 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now