Jump to content

Boeing drops engine parts on Denver


JohnT

Recommended Posts

Luckily no one hurts but a United Airlines Boeing 777 lost on engine which shed parts and went on fire. Video of an alarming loose engine on fire in the BBC report here

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-56141673

 

Still good news that it got down ok but not what you want to see out of the window of your aeroplane 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, PhantomBigStu said:

Indeed, testament  to the design that it’s almost trivial for it to lose an engine, be interesting to see the cause, dunno about the engines originality but the airframe is 777 number 5 with over 26 years on the clock 

Of more import perhaps is how many hours and cycles the engine has since new and since last overhaul, and whether it's subject to additional inspections due to these or unscheduled shutdowns and/or removals because of previous failures.  Let's let the NTSB/FAA/Boeing/United do their jobs and find out exactly what happened.  Well done to the crew for getting everyone back down to terra firma without further drama and no reported injuries.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Hook said:

The same happened to a 747 over the Netherlands yesterday: 

What are the chances? Twice within 48 hours. If I was one of the passengers, the first thing that I would want to do is shake the pilot's hand.......after getting some clean underwear of course.

 

John.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saw a brief video from someone on the ground watching the first one go over their house.  Must have been pretty scary, but when an aircraft engine failing is newsworthy, it's a testament to the actual robustness and reliability of these things today :)

 

Both landed safely, which is the best part :yes:

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, JohnT said:

Luckily no one hurts but a United Airlines Boeing 777 lost on engine which shed parts and went on fire. Video of an alarming loose engine on fire in the BBC report here

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-56141673

 

Still good news that it got down ok but not what you want to see out of the window of your aeroplane 

Hats off to the crew for safely handling the situation. I'll bet there are a few marks on the escape chutes that'll take more than a couple of bottles of Vanish to remove 😊

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While both are engine failures. That's the only thing in common. Different engines types , different airframes. 

 

The 777 lost the inlet and much of the cowlings. It's hard to tell from the video if any of the fan blades are missing. If so  then that's a possible reason the inlet was ripped off. 

 

On the 747 it looks like the cowlings remained in place but a lot of turbine blades were scattered about. I've seen the results of one turbine blade failing and taking out most of the rest of the hot section. Not pretty. 

 

Time and investigation will tell. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, noelh said:

The 777 lost the inlet and much of the cowlings. It's hard to tell from the video if any of the fan blades are missing. If so  then that's a possible reason the inlet was ripped off. 

 

The post-landing photos appear to show one and a half blades missing from the first stage of the fan.

 

https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/638797-united-b777-uncontained-engine-failure-4.html

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Current update:

 

Japan's Civil Aviation Bureau, and the FAA have suspended operations of B-777 aircraft powered by Pratt & Whitney 4000-112 engines. This is a small proportion of the total 777 fleet.

 

In the US, only United appears to be an operator of the subtype.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting, we maybe not is how the first thing medias all say is the age of the plane. Meanwhile planes are constantly looked at and overhauled. Well vast majority are. Wonder if the guy with blade in the roof of the car will get to keep it. Gives the car some character.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, KevinK said:

 

The post-landing photos appear to show one and a half blades missing from the first stage of the fan.

 

https://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/638797-united-b777-uncontained-engine-failure-4.html

 

 

That explains it, looking at the video again the vibration points to that situation. That vibration along with any damage from the departing blades could have caused the inlet to separate. 

Incidentally that thread title in pprune isn't strictly correct unless the definition of an uncontained failure has changed since my time. 

 

The media of course is on the case linking it to the 737 Max issue. 🙄. Then the age of the aircraft. Which is irrelevant to the age or maintenance history of the engines. The fan blades could be brand new. Engines don't stay with one airframe or even one airline. 

 

You'd think the media in general would educate themselves on the topic? 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Corsairfoxfouruncle said:

Seems another happened today ? 
 

https://apple.news/AIFpPOmrNTaKE4nkEb6gtaQ
 

This time Delta B757 from Atlanta to Seattle had to divert to Salt Lake City Utah. 

But is this actually newsworthy? I guess engine issues happen with 1000s daily flights. I guess media will report any issue with engines and Boeing they can get hold of... it makes news= money for them.... :(

 

It is just that the 777's issue was spectacular and let to a partial fleet grounding.

Let's hope its is not systematic, but I doubt a 757 shares a lot with the 777 but the manufacturer!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, exdraken said:

But is this actually newsworthy? I guess engine issues happen with 1000s daily flights. I guess media will report any issue with engines and Boeing they can get hold of... it makes news= money for them.... :(

 

It is just that the 777's issue was spectacular and let to a partial fleet grounding.

Let's hope its is not systematic, but I doubt a 757 shares a lot with the 777 but the manufacturer!

I agree it probably only made the news because its a Boeing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Even though he's not an official NTSB. this guy "Blanclolirio" gives a good account of the situation. He is a pilot and does explain things pretty good. Gives a different perspective than regular media that don't always know much about aircraft.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwNCCrjMmeg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh4727krwH4

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, busnproplinerfan said:

Even though he's not an official NTSB. this guy "Blanclolirio" gives a good account of the situation. He is a pilot and does explain things pretty good. Gives a different perspective than regular media that don't always know much about aircraft.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwNCCrjMmeg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jh4727krwH4

 

I've watched quite a few of this gentleman's videos and he always provides a good analytical insight to the subject in question. No media hysterics, no headline grabbing waffle, just plain simple and consice facts. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, cngaero said:

I've watched quite a few of this gentleman's videos and he always provides a good analytical insight to the subject in question. No media hysterics, no headline grabbing waffle, just plain simple and consice facts. 

I like watching him to for the same reason. there's a couple like that but not many. I started watching him when he talked about the last Snowbirds crash so he not only talks about U.S. crashes but everyone.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...