Homebee Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 (edited) Dora Wings is to release a 1/48th Curtiss-Wright CW-21 Interceptor kits - ref. DW48046 - Curtiss-Wright CW-21B Interceptor - released - ref. DW48049 - Curtiss-Wright CW-21A Demonstrator - released - ref. DW48052 - Curtiss-Wright CW-21B Interceptor Source: https://www.facebook.com/dorawingsofficial/posts/2942649705965587 3D renders V.P. Edited September 21, 2022 by Homebee 11 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supersonic26 Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 Ooh, that is a brillant choice! Such a beautiful little airplane and pretty much no kit (in any scale) available. No idea how well these Dora Wings kits build but their philosophy of tackling obscure WW2 stuff certainly makes them very attractive. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SleeperService Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 56 minutes ago, Supersonic26 said: No idea how well these Dora Wings kits build but their philosophy of tackling obscure WW2 stuff certainly makes them very attractive. I've only built two but they've both been OK with a little care in places especially where moulding stubs were removed. It's very easy to remove too much plastic. Welcome to BM BTW I hope you enjoy your time here. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Esposito Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 Finally! In 1/48! 😎 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branky Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 But from my point of view the wrong version. It should have been a CW21B. It saw slightly more action. Only 3 CW21's ever built and flown and they ended up against a mountain in China... BTW only the CW21B's were called "Interceptor", the CW21 was called the "Demon". .. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
occa Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 Now excuse my obligatory question, will this come out in 1/72 also ? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dora Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 3 hours ago, occa said: Now excuse my obligatory question, will this come out in 1/72 also ? Yes. 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Esposito Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 (edited) 7 hours ago, Branky said: But from my point of view the wrong version. It should have been a CW21B. It saw slightly more action. Only 3 CW21's ever built and flown and they ended up against a mountain in China... BTW only the CW21B's were called "Interceptor", the CW21 was called the "Demon". .. Incorrect. It was called; the C-21 Demon-interceptor fighter https://www.warbirdforum.com/cw21.htm Edited January 25, 2021 by Mike Esposito Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Esposito Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, Mike Esposito said: Incorrect. It was called; the C-21 Demon-interceptor fighter https://www.warbirdforum.com/cw21.htm 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Holden Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 3 hours ago, Mike Esposito said: Wrong. It was never called 'Demon' . Historian Dan Hagedorn found from Curtiss records that 'demon' was just an abbreviation for 'demonstrator' in the paperwork. Books from the 60s-90s calling it 'Demon' are plain wrong.... 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supersonic26 Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 9 hours ago, Roger Holden said: Wrong. It was never called 'Demon' . Historian Dan Hagedorn found from Curtiss records that 'demon' was just an abbreviation for 'demonstrator' in the paperwork. Books from the 60s-90s calling it 'Demon' are plain wrong.... I love how there's always more to learn on stuff like this! Turns out there's even a copy of said Curtiss paperwork online. The word "Interceptor" can probably be used freely for either version as it's less of a given name and more of a job description - the concept of the plane was centered around the interceptor role, so putting "CW-21 Interceptor" on the box of a kit would be like putting "Ju 87 Dive Bomber"! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branky Posted January 26, 2021 Share Posted January 26, 2021 The name "Interceptor" was adopted in Dutch East Indies as the planes name. "Demon" would have frightened the local people too much. So we had Interceptors, Buffalo's and Hawk's. The Bombers were always just Martins with little differentiation between the WH1, WH2 and WH3 versions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skawinski Posted January 27, 2021 Share Posted January 27, 2021 On 25/01/2021 at 13:06, Branky said: But from my point of view the wrong version. It should have been a CW21B. It saw slightly more action. Only 3 CW21's ever built and flown and they ended up against a mountain in China... BTW only the CW21B's were called "Interceptor", the CW21 was called the "Demon". .. Very good point. Different undercarriage etc. Do we know if they will be releasing the 'main' (CW-21B) version also? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dragonlanceHR Posted January 27, 2021 Share Posted January 27, 2021 3 hours ago, Skawinski said: Very good point. Different undercarriage etc. Do we know if they will be releasing the 'main' (CW-21B) version also? When asked last year, the answer was no. But maybe they'll change their mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dora Posted January 27, 2021 Share Posted January 27, 2021 1 hour ago, dragonlanceHR said: When asked last year, the answer was no. But maybe they'll change their mind. Maybe. But there is no information at all on the wheel bay of the CW-21B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Esposito Posted January 27, 2021 Share Posted January 27, 2021 2 hours ago, dragonlanceHR said: When asked last year, the answer was no. But maybe they'll change their mind. The C-21 IS the definitive version. 30+ built vs 24 for the "B" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kopperhed Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 I'm pretty happy either way. I have an old Sierra Scale B that I can use to do some kitbashing with if need be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branky Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 On 1/27/2021 at 4:21 PM, Mike Esposito said: The C-21 IS the definitive version. 30+ built vs 24 for the "B" Ìndeed fully true, 30 planes or so were built and except 2-3 who flew into a Chinese mountain they all ended up in a warehouse in Rangoon. But "What if" those 100 for the AVG did materialise......" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skawinski Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 (edited) 46 minutes ago, Branky said: except 2-3 who flew into a Chinese mountain they all ended up in a warehouse in Rangoon. But "What if" those 100 for the AVG did materialise.... Not sure if Dora will provide an aircraft in a crated version, though (that reportedly 27 were produced). Apart from that only aircraft with civilian and later Chinese markings were actually flying, I believe there were 4 of them in total. I guess we will see some what-ifs. Edited January 28, 2021 by Skawinski Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Branky Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 Numbers vary but indeed 3-4 making them the most profilic version 🙂 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Esposito Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 (edited) 4 hours ago, Branky said: Ìndeed fully true, 30 planes or so were built and except 2-3 who flew into a Chinese mountain they all ended up in a warehouse in Rangoon. But "What if" those 100 for the AVG did materialise......" Then, IT would be the definitive version. Edited January 28, 2021 by Mike Esposito Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimmaas Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 Just an additional note - the CW-21B had a sliding canopy where the top section was colored (green? yellow-orange? It's debatable). Not sure if this was applicable for the earlier version Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skawinski Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 3 minutes ago, jimmaas said: Just an additional note - the CW-21B had a sliding canopy where the top section was colored (green? yellow-orange? It's debatable). Not sure if this was applicable for the earlier version Well spotted! Indeed both CW-21 and CW-21B had top part of canopy plexi tinted. I don't know the colour, but maybe some clue would be the fact, that Polish PZL Los bomber had similar solution applied and plexi was tinted blue. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WorstKaasScenario Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 I've got this colour photograph lying around which clearly shows it orange. I remember it being an original colour picture, but I'm not 100% sure and I can't find out where I got it from. 2 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
occa Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 @WorstKaasScenario Boom, that color photo comes as a full surprise, you can even make out the two topside colors even if there's a low contrast. Do you have more of these gems around ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now