rafalbert Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 Hi guys, I have had this one a long time so it is probably about time I built it. It is obviously a SU-15TM, Pioneer (and PM) getting the designator wrong in accordance with mistakes made in NATO reporting. I have no idea how accurate the kit is and it looks pretty crude but it is a Flagon which is good enough for me. I have a set of Begemot decals which should improve things a little. Dave 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted November 5, 2020 Share Posted November 5, 2020 Delighted to see another Soviet subject getting attention here Although I can't comment on its accuracy I'm sure others amongst us can and perhaps suggest some simple fixes if needed. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 4 hours ago, rafalbert said: It is obviously a SU-15TM, Pioneer (and PM) getting the designator wrong in accordance with mistakes made in NATO reporting There is an opinion that the Su-21 should be called an attack aircraft Sukhoi T-58Sh: based on the Su-15 .... but this is not certain! 😁 Some modelers even made a model of such a Su-21: http://alternathistory.com/alternativnye-shturmoviki-su-21-sssr/ B.R. Serge 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterB Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 I have what I think is a Trumpeter version, but I cannot match the details up with any of the Flagons on Scalemates. Anyway, it looks quite good and the only problem I had was making sure I mounted the inner missiles correctly. The position of the pylons is just in front of the main wheel well and according to my Midland Book the inner pylons were used for short range R-60 missiles, (Aphid) but the kit provided either the much larger R-8 (Anab) missile or more likely the improved R-98 version for all 4 pylons. These are perhaps too long for the inner pylons and can overlap the wheel doors if you are not careful! Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 27 minutes ago, PeterB said: but the kit provided either the much larger R-8 (Anab) missile or more likely the improved R-98 version for all 4 pylons. Pete it's unrealistic, Trumpeter wrong: http://xn--80aafy5bs.xn--p1ai/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/16.Shema-variantov-podveski-vooruzhenij-Su-15TM.-589x600.png ...but who knows, Su-15 have made surprises: http://xn--80aafy5bs.xn--p1ai/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/2.Su-15TM-s-podveshennymi-UPK-23-250-i-blokami-UB-32.jpg http://nacekomie.ru/forum/files/201204/15021_78fcdde68ba63f7b639c81c79a2bf789.jpg B.R. Serge 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 7 hours ago, Aardvark said: There is an opinion that the Su-21 should be called an attack aircraft Sukhoi T-58Sh: based on the Su-15 .... but this is not certain! 😁 Some modelers even made a model of such a Su-21: http://alternathistory.com/alternativnye-shturmoviki-su-21-sssr/ B.R. Serge That looks a fun use for a cheap Su-15 and MiG-27 kit 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 1 hour ago, Col. said: That looks a fun use for a cheap Su-15 and MiG-27 kit Yeah....MiG-27, especially in modification MiG-27K has always been the object of envy and lust in the Sukhoi Design Bureau! 😉😁 They reached the level of the MiG-27K in the fixed wing Su-17M5 .... which was made only on paper.... B.R. Serge 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterB Posted November 6, 2020 Share Posted November 6, 2020 Actually, I suspect mine was either Pioneer or PM after all - not sure why I thought it was Trumpeter. I will have to did out a couple of spare Acrids! Presumable one Anab would be IR homing and one radar I will have to check as I seem to remember they had a standard pattern as to which type went on which pylon eg IR on left Radar on right. Pete 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exdraken Posted November 7, 2020 Share Posted November 7, 2020 22 hours ago, Aardvark said: Yeah....MiG-27, especially in modification MiG-27K has always been the object of envy and lust in the Sukhoi Design Bureau! 😉😁 They reached the level of the MiG-27K in the fixed wing Su-17M5 .... which was made only on paper.... B.R. Serge They finally succeded with a platypus in the form of the Su-34 great subject and discussion by the way! 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted November 7, 2020 Share Posted November 7, 2020 6 hours ago, exdraken said: They finally succeded with a platypus in the form of the Su-34 And yes and no .... oddly enough, the Su-34 is worse than the Su-24 in its ability to make a long flight near the ground in the terrain bend mode. In principle, even the chief pilot of the MiG V. Menitsky mentioned that the Sukhoi Design Bureau considered not McDonnell Douglas or Lockheed but the Mikoyan Design Bureau as their main competitor, and made every effort to destroy it .... in principle, they actually succeeded. 6 hours ago, exdraken said: great subject and discussion by the way! 😁 "You talk as if there is something bad in it!"(с)*😁 B.R. Serge ___________ * - Russian modern ironic expression, popular meme in friendly discussion, often logically contradicts the previous statement, as an example: "- but he's an idiot! - You talk as if there is something bad in it!" 😁 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
exdraken Posted November 8, 2020 Share Posted November 8, 2020 On 11/7/2020 at 4:23 PM, Aardvark said: "You talk as if there is something bad in it!"(с)*😁 B.R. Serge ___________ * - Russian modern ironic expression, popular meme in friendly discussion, often logically contradicts the previous statement, as an example: "- but he's an idiot! - You talk as if there is something bad in it!" 😁 It is a discussion forum, no? if unclear, I am delighted to read about new (for me at least) aspects of the more obscure aviation areas! the F-16 is quite well know in comparison,.. but he is an idiot, you know? 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafalbert Posted November 16, 2020 Author Share Posted November 16, 2020 Well, I have made a start. The kit is (not unexpectedly) crude to say the least, but since I have decided to build it from the box, I have assembled the fuselage. The seam needs a LOT of attention despite my fettling but at least it is taking shape. At the moment the front end reminds me of a Mig-25, but I guess they were designed for similar jobs after all! 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafalbert Posted January 7, 2021 Author Share Posted January 7, 2021 After a break following the completion of the Tornados and Christmas I am back on with the Flagon. First job was working in the intakes; PM have decided to engrave the warning markings rather than supply decals bizarrely: These have duly been filled (along with the the holes) as the excellent Begemot sheet has included the correct markings along with stencil data. The fit of the kit overall is not great and I am having to use liberal amounts of filler, but as this was expected I am actually enjoying the challenge. I will am planning to give it a coat of primer at each stage to make sure I have sorted out each problem area which I am hoping will address the rough surface issue. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RidgeRunner Posted January 8, 2021 Share Posted January 8, 2021 I'm looking forward to this one :). What a might beast the Flagon was! Martin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted January 8, 2021 Share Posted January 8, 2021 Good to see this one taking shape and that you're enjoying its challenges 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafalbert Posted January 15, 2021 Author Share Posted January 15, 2021 It has taken a while to blend in the wings to the fuselage due to there being a large step on the belly (the lower wings and belly are moulded as one part). They now look to be flush but I need to fill the joint lines and rescribe. With hindsight it would have been easier to trim the fuselage prior to fitting the wings rather than sanding them flush 🤦🏼♂️! 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafalbert Posted January 28, 2021 Author Share Posted January 28, 2021 Finally got to the stage where I could apply the aluminium only to find that I have failed to address a couple of sink marks effectively and not done a decent job fairing in the intakes 🤦🏼♂️. I am going to live with them as they are. The radome and the tip of the tail will be painted green and the anti glare panels black, all to be done within the next few days. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted January 28, 2021 Share Posted January 28, 2021 The sink marks don't look obvious in the photos so think you'll get away with them 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafalbert Posted February 11, 2021 Author Share Posted February 11, 2021 Now the Phantom is finished I have been cracking on with the Flagon. I was originally planning to leave the panels all one tone of aluminium but changed my mind; mistake! I have attempted to go for some variation but it looks terrible, so have left it to just a couple of panels on the wings. I will start applying the decals over the weekend. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafalbert Posted February 19, 2021 Author Share Posted February 19, 2021 All decals now applied, and the Begemot sheet is a little more detailed than the one supplied with the kit (see photo). The stencils took a while to apply but they definitely add a bit more interest to the aluminium finish. I was going to live with the jagged edge on the anti glare panels on the intakes but found that I can't, so will address them and give it a satin coat. After that I just need to add the missiles and undercarriage and it is done. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted February 19, 2021 Share Posted February 19, 2021 While the kit may be a basic one you're scrubbing it up well. Looking good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterB Posted February 20, 2021 Share Posted February 20, 2021 Hi, This appears to be the same kit I built a good few years back and I presume it still comes with 4 x R8 aka AA-3 or maybe the improved R98 AA-3A Anab missiles (the difference is mostly internal), two IR and two passive radar? I build mine with all 4 as per the instructions though it was apparent that the inboard ones would have got in the way of the undercarriage, which seemed strange at the time, though it did fit the usual Soviet pattern of carrying both types of seeker head to cover all options. You probably know this already, but unfortunately, I have since learned that for the Su-15TM that is incorrect - the inner pylons actually seem to have carried either one or two R60 aka AA-8 Aphids on either PU 1 single rails or, less commonly PU 2 double rails. Being much shorter the AA-8 did not get in the way of the u/c! My sources indicate that the outer pylons carried a pair of AA-3/3A, usually the latter, normally both IR or both Radar rather than a mix. As the AA-8 covers the IR function albeit with a much shorter range, the Anabs would usually have been radar I suspect. Hope that helps, but entirely up to you how you arm your plane - I have drawings and pics of both the missiles and mountings if needed. Your build looks good and having a replacement sheet with stencils clearly improves the appearance. Cheers Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafalbert Posted February 24, 2021 Author Share Posted February 24, 2021 Well, the undercarriage and missile rails were on, missiles just about to be added then somehow I managed to get the nose probe stuck on my sleeve and catapulted the whole thing across the room. The damage could have been a lot worse but I am walking away tonight. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rafalbert Posted February 25, 2021 Author Share Posted February 25, 2021 Ok, slapdash repairs completed and the project is done. Thank you for that Pete, I did some research and found this: http://xn--80aafy5bs.xn--p1ai/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/16.Shema-variantov-podveski-vooruzhenij-Su-15TM.-589x600.png As a result, I managed to source some AA8s from an old Airfix Mig-29 which have duly been attached to the inner pylons. This was a crude kit (and crudely built by me) of quite a crude, brutal looking interceptor which looks awesome with it. I have long ago realised that I have neither the skills nor the patience to produce beautiful models so as long as they look ok on my shelf I am happy. This was actually good fun to build (apart from the crash landing) and I have learned that I need a hell of a lot of practice if I am going to get a good finish on metallic tone variation. The Begemot decals were excellent and I would have no hesitation in recommending them and buying other sets for other projects. Anyway, here she is: 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dansk Posted February 25, 2021 Share Posted February 25, 2021 3 hours ago, rafalbert said: Looks great to me! Very nice. I love the shot above. Looks like it’s flying through space 😁 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now