Jump to content

Recommended Posts

50470215342_07794c53f8_b.jpg

 

This was a birthday gift from my wife.  Possibly a record in recent times for getting built within two months of acquisition and not suffering a diversion into the stash!  On opening the box I was surprised and pleased to see the decals were for un-PC Rothmans rather than the boxart “Racing”.  The real car is just down the road at Beaulieu if you want to go and see what its supposed to look like.

.

The kit itself is somewhat ancient, originally by Esci and having been reboxed by both Revell and Italeri over the years.  Now I love cars with massive flared arches as much as the next child growing up in the 70s, but these seem to have been tooled by someone from the Matchbox or HotWheels design studio after plenty of wacky baccy!  Whether to do anything about it was the issue, as they stand they don’t look anything like those from the RS Parts ads in the Motoring News we’d avidly read at school in the 70s.  In the end I decided not to bother, as carpaint is a lot less forgiving than painting the filler-fest of some older aircraft kits!  So after a few coats of Halfords Appliance White and the application of the excellent (best part of the kit) decals, I brushed on a couple of coats of Klear to get a reasonable period shine.

 

The kit itself is OOB, I thought several times about the arches but they would need a lot of correcting, so I just stuck M3 washers from the hardware shop as wheel spacers to get the wheels a bit further outboard.  I also suspect the mid-joint in a propshaft is unlikely, and whilst I opened up some lap-belt holes in the side of the seats, I ignored the need for the decal belts to stretch to the back of the car (somewhere); this seems a common failing of decal seatbelts.

 

50470215362_4d30c483bf_b.jpg

 

50469358473_6f747061db_b.jpg

 

50469358483_4948e590e4_b.jpg

 

50470058916_48b23c9654_b.jpg

 

Anyway, for all its severely compromised accuracy, in this livery the kit looks quite striking and worth the effort.  But any future cars will be Tamiya, Aoshima or Fujimi kits…

 

Cheers

Will

  • Like 23
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice build - the washer spacers have worked well and really improve the track! Neat finish and decalling too!

 

1 hour ago, malpaso said:

someone from the Matchbox or HotWheels design studio after plenty of wacky baccy! 

 

🤣

 

Having looked at and modified a few of these over the years I think Esci were trying to get an arch somewhere close to a 'Monte Special' tarmac Escort - which would be odd as Ford only built three of them! - and missed! I think I prefer your explanation though!

 

Keith

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've heard this is a most excremental kit, but this is a very good end result. As with everyone else it seems, I think it was an excellent move to push those wheels a bit further towards the outside of the arches - makes them look much fuller than they would have done otherwise. Good work on getting those decals to lay down so smoothly too.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done mate, I literally just got bought the earlier version of this kit with the white and blue markings for my birthday and I'm having the same experiance as you, it's a fun kit to put together although clearly ancient!

 

Rich

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good build , excellent decaling . I have the ESCI original kit with Rothmans after market decals and  its still the car most people ask about when looking at my display cabinet full of more modern stuff . Nobody ever realises  it's not accurate.  Until someone brings out a new Mk2  kit this does nicely I think .  

 Gary . 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice indeed 👏 👏👏

 

I've just started the 1980 Eaton's Yale version and spending most of my time filling sink marks and removing flash. I also filed away ~1.5mm from the depth of the rear arches which has helped the aesthetics, but will also use rear spacers.

Also, if you look closely you'll spot the drivers side front right arch is wider than the passenger side arch (not sure how they got that wrong!) :) 

 

If I feel brave, maybe post some completed pics in a month or so (my first build since 1992) 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/29/2020 at 6:05 PM, High-Lander said:

Very nice indeed 👏 👏👏

 

I've just started the 1980 Eaton's Yale version and spending most of my time filling sink marks and removing flash. I also filed away ~1.5mm from the depth of the rear arches which has helped the aesthetics, but will also use rear spacers.

Also, if you look closely you'll spot the drivers side front right arch is wider than the passenger side arch (not sure how they got that wrong!) :) 

 

If I feel brave, maybe post some completed pics in a month or so (my first build since 1992) 

Thanks for your messages.  I had a suspicion about odd front arches but avoided measuring as that seemed like madness if I actually wanted to get on and build the kit!  I agree about the sink marks.  There is a particularly awkward x-shape on the outside of the bonnet, due to the framing inside, I filled and sanded multi-times till it was all as smooth as a baby's derriere, but it still caught the light at certain angles - luckily the Rothmans stripes and decals break up the X but plain colour liveries may be harder to resolve!  

Good Luck with your version

Will

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...