Jump to content

Swiss voters approve purchase of new fighter aircraft (barely)


Slater

Recommended Posts

Or offsets?

Or capability?

Somehow I still can't see the need for the offensive oriented F-35... though I fear....

 

My 2cents:

For max air defence capability it should be Typhoon

For max operational capability and cooperation probably Rafale

And for stealth F-35 obviously...

Superhornet comes last but for synergies with the current fleet...

 

So mybe a split buy?

24 Rafales now and whatever the F-35/akternatives to it  then in 15 years?

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, exdraken said:

My 2cents:

For max air defence capability it should be Typhoon

For max operational capabiity and cooperation probably Rafale

And for stealth F-35 obviously...

Superhornet comes last but for synergies with the cutrent fleet...

 

I agree with all this - I'll be watching the bid with interest :)

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Slater said:

Seems Like Gripen E/F would have been a reasonable option, but apparently that's not on the table.

i agree, as was the Gripen with Austria 20 years ago...

 

second problem with Gripen apart from not fully complying with the requirements (not being operational at time of bids) is that it was already declined once by the Swiss public...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Truro Model Builder said:

The last time around, about ten years ago, apparently the Swiss considered that the Typhoon was the only aircraft that met their requirements. Not just military, but in terms of environmental and noise restraints as well.

 

Environmentally friendly reheat 🤣

 

That said, in line with the Clean Sky aims, European aircraft are gradually switching to much more environmentally friendly materials and processes - chrome plating for example, isn't being used anywhere near as much by Airbus, etc, Boeing still use plenty of chrome (at least they did when I started in the industry a few years ago).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Didn't take long for the US State Department to clear the way for any potential purchase (including Patriot):

 

https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/mas/switzerland_20-35.pdf

 

https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/mas/switzerland_20-34.pdf

 

https://www.dsca.mil/sites/default/files/mas/switzerland_20-43.pdf

 

Edited by Slater
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Truro Model Builder said:

Looking at those notifications, I would like to know how on earth forty Super Hornets with associated gubbins can cost $7.45 billion, but forty F-35As come in at $6.58 billion. Did they mix up the numbers?

 

interesting indeed!

some thoughts:

Super Hornet production: several hundred

Lightning II: several thousand planned

 

2 engines vs 1

 

naval requirements vs land based

 

in more detail:

 it is 40 Super Hornets with 96 engines

40 F-35s with 46 engines...

 

 

 

the Super Hornet seems to have a bit more weapons and "gubbins" included

so much for Hornet - Superhornet "upgrade" efficiency! 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Truro Model Builder said:

Looking at those notifications, I would like to know how on earth forty Super Hornets with associated gubbins can cost $7.45 billion, but forty F-35As come in at $6.58 billion. Did they mix up the numbers?

 

Lockheed Martin have actually done a really good job at driving down the cost of the F35A. There was a lot of criticism of the F35 for delays and cost overruns (as with every big project), but for the quality of the aircraft, it's actually not that expensive...

 

Furthermore, with a foreign military sale (FMS), the aircraft are not being purchased (by a country) from the manufacturer, they are being purchased from the US government. The US government has large orders of F35s but not large orders of Super Hornets (i.e. it's not that expensive to add more F35 orders).

 

I can't help but think there may be some politics involved in it... i.e. whats the point of selling a Super Hornet when you can sell your latest and greatest jet!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Points noted, but the F-35A is a generation ahead of the Super Bug, with stealth materials and umpteen other technologies. It still does not explain why forty of them are cheaper than forty F/A-18Es.

 

Politics indeed. Boeing must be mightily hacked off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...