TheyJammedKenny! Posted September 24, 2020 Share Posted September 24, 2020 All: I know that the Canberra PR.9 could operate well above 48K feet, and its real service ceiling likely remains classified. My question is: did Canberra flight crews wear Lightning-style partial pressure jerkins, pressure helmets, and G-leggings for protection against rapid decompression at high altitudes? Did they pre-breathe 100% oxygen for 45 minutes before flights? If so, were the mission briefings conducted while they were pre-breathing, or before? I ask because our U-2C pilots and RB-57 crews routinely pre-breathed O2 for an hour or so before their flights, and wore mission-continuation partial-pressure suits (as opposed to "get me down" partial-pressure suits). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheyJammedKenny! Posted October 3, 2020 Author Share Posted October 3, 2020 Got my answer. Professional Pilots' Rumour Network (PPRuNe) to the rescue! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan B Posted October 3, 2020 Share Posted October 3, 2020 22 minutes ago, TheyJammedKenny! said: Got my answer. Professional Pilots' Rumour Network (PPRuNe) to the rescue! So what was it? Duncan B 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheyJammedKenny! Posted October 4, 2020 Author Share Posted October 4, 2020 For high altitude flights, the crew members wore the same pressure jerkins, G-suit leggings, and fully enclosed/pressurized helmet Lighting crews did. So if you decide to build a crewed PR.9 for high altitude ops, you'll want to suit them up appropriately. There was no discussion about pre-breathing O2, but I can only assume they did as a precaution to purge nitrogen from their bodies (and avoid dangerous gas bubble formation at altitude). On performance: one PPRuNe member said Canberra crews would complain that their Green Satin radar would "unlock" above FL600, as this was beyond the radar's performance limit--so the pilots were up at least that high. One of the folks on the PPRuNe board recalled at least one Canberra PR.9 pilot reporting his altitude to Malta ATC as "FL630 and descending," in response to a query as to his whereabouts (because ATC lacked his radar return) so you can draw your own conclusions. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Truro Model Builder Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 The PR.9 could seemingly get up to 70,000ft. My favourite story is the phone call one PR.9 crew made to a Phantom squadron: "Hi, we've got some continuation training coming up and were wondering if you'd like some work against high altitude targets?" "Yeah, that would be great!" "Wonderful, we'll see you at FL600 then." [click] 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now