Jump to content

Heather's Workbench - building a Civvie Auster


Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Moa said:

Excellent progress and good solutions to the challenges, Heather.

Cheers

Thank you. Coming from such a master, that is praise indeed. 
 

49817101268_eb0c6746fe_b.jpg

 

Basic brushed aluminium coat everywhere. It’s hard to tell from the two photos of the plane I’m (not quite) building, but the belly tank could be a darker colour. Then again, it may as well be shadows at play, so I’ve gone with aluminium. The wing struts do appear to be a different colour, though, and my interpretation is a blue like the registration code. 
 

That reminds me I need to get some clear transfer sheet in so I can have a play at printing my own registration for this model.

  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Heather Kay said:

Cheers chaps!

 

49816883838_2dea03deb5_b.jpg

 

Lego has been deployed. Starboard wing and struts glued - I hope. As you can also see, the port struts didn’t survive extraction. I think there was actually a tiny mould flaw that gave rise to a weakness where it broke.

 

Walking away now to avoid the temptation of fiddling before the glue has set.

Excellent solution with lego rig.  As the wise man said  "Invention is a mother.... when it's a necessity"

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, John Aero said:

I note that your Auster spent some time in Kenya and met it's end in a mid-air collision with a Forney F.1A Aircoupe in 1969. A sad ending.

Indeed. Both pilots were killed in the accident, sadly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No piccies just now. All the parts are fitted now. I’ve decided to chicken out of the wind generator and pitot tube, but I could always revisit them later. Some final paint touching up to do, and then a wait while I source some transfer sheet so I can make the registration markings.

 

I rather feel I rushed this build. Then again, it’s not a complicated kit, despite the lack of location points. Most of the parts fit well, and the only filler I used was on the belly. I suspect I could have done a better job, but Best Beloved will like it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Martian Hale said:

It has even got me wondering where my Sword 1/48 kit is.

I think it’s fair to say the larger scales suit these little planes. It’s such a tiny thing at 1/72nd it makes a Miles Magister positively palatial!

 

49820079133_a6601b432e_b.jpg

 

49820933327_0aeddeee21_b.jpg


49820079083_8c1c373f21_b.jpg

 

49820079058_7bf7212cb1_b.jpg


49820623811_bab8d2d8ec_b.jpg

 

These will do for a temporary RFI until I get the transfers sorted out.

 

Thanks for watching everyone, and pitching in with information and details on the planes. I am afraid it’s back to aggressive types again.

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What size of decals do you need Heather? I have a good selection of Aeroclub British registration decals and might have something that will do the job.

 

Helpful of Mars 👽

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Martian Hale said:

I have a good selection of Aeroclub British registration decals

If you see the photo of the real plane earlier, you can see the letters on the tailplane. I guess they’re going to be no more than 2 or 3mm high. I think they’re in a blue, as well. 
 

If you have anything that fits that bill, I would be grateful. :) I have been meaning to have a crack at making my own transfers for a long time, and I still hope to see if I can make them for this build anyway. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your Auster was in truth a bit of an odd bird. It started life as G-ALUE the final production Autocrat. It went to Kenya as VP-KKG and later returned to UK where it was converted as an Auster J1S by the fitting of a Chipmunk Gipsy Major 10 engine, whence it became G-AMVN.

Heather, I might be able to help with suitable letter decals from my personal stock if you would like to contact me.

 

John

Edited by John Aero
Further info.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would agree about the colour being blue although red could be a possibility. Did the aircraft have wing registrations and if so, any idea of size there? They would probably be bigger.

 

Martian 👽

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, John Aero said:

Your Auster was in truth a bit of an odd bird.

 

Heather, I might be able to help with suitable letter decals from my personal stock if you would like to contact me.

You've saved me asking if you might know the history! Best Beloved and I had sort of worked out it probably had the Gipsy Major, by a bit of deduction based on the photos. Despite working through the Auster Heritage Group's web site, G-MAVN didn't show up, so we assumed it had been registered overseas, or had another registration at first. 

 

Thank you for the offer of the lettering. As with Martian, shall we say I'd like to leave it for now until I find out whether I can make my own successfully?

28 minutes ago, Martian Hale said:

I would agree about the colour being blue although red could be a possibility. Did the aircraft have wing registrations and if so, any idea of size there? They would probably be bigger.

With only two photos that we could find, it wasn't clear if there were underwing registrations at all. We've assumed it unlikely, but always open to better knowledge. Like I say to John, shall we leave it for now? Once I've worked out if I can make custom transfers satisfactorily or not, I'll be in touch. 

8 minutes ago, John Aero said:

I would suggest the aircraft carried the required Port under and Starboard upper wing registrations plus the vertical tail.

That makes sense. Oh for better photos!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very smart Heather - I like that, a lot!

 

Good job :) 

 

Good luck with the transfers - worth getting the hang of it IMHO. My only advice would be to get some 'proper modelling' paper. I bought some cheap stuff designed, probably, for decorating mugs and the like and it was pretty useless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heather. the Port under and Starboard upper plus tail (in lieu of fuselage letters) would be mandatory and required by Air Law. The P Ud & S Up, replaced the full span  plus fuselage sides, registration requirement.

 

John

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was going to say I thought you had the wings attached at the wrong angle. If you look at the top of the canopy, the side-to-side "metal bar" about halfway back is the wing spar, so the wing upper surface should be level with the top of the canopy at that point. John's pic above confirms that.

Otherwise looking great!

 

Ian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...