Stressy Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Is the idea of converting an Academy B24J Liberator to a Privateer by using parts of the old Matchbox kit a silly non-starter? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gingerbob Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Or perhaps enhancing the Matchbox kit with parts from the Academy. Personally (not having experience of the kit) I'd approach it more that way, rather than all the chopping and grafting that would be required if you started with a B-24 airframe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyot Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 As above,...... the Matchbox kit is the better start point due to the lengthened fuselage and the engine nacelles with the cowlings twisted to have the intakes above and below and no superchargers either,..... not to mention the fin and the waist positions. The Academy kit foesn`t really add much above the Marchbox when it comes to more detailed parts,...... I would probably buy some vacuformed Martin turret cupola`s and a new Bendix nose turret and then busy up the interior around the waist guns yourself. Cheers Tony 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denford Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 There was a 1/72 resin 'Detail Set' for the Matchbox Privateer produced by Cobra Resin ref CC72019. Very good it is too, and awaits its call to duty. A web search suggests they are part of Lone Star Models who are off line till the end of January. Much of the search turned up their 1/48 Privateer and nothing in 1/72: sorry I can't be more specific. The said 1/72 set doesn't contain any control surfaces and I have my doubts about the elevators which seem, as I recall, to be different top and bottom. Also the rather curious kit representation of the rudder shown as fabric one side and metal the other! Examination of photos of wreckage suggests that it was entirely metal covered. Reliable drawings are hard to find and besides the above particularly confirm or otherwise of the position of the tailplane in relation to the fuselage: again examination of photos (including those of B-24 which must surely be the same) suggest the kit is OK. I have a folorn hope that Airfix may tool it one day, but I would rank it below the Lincoln and a retooled Halifax. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthBayKid Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Chris (Cobra Company) sold his masters to Lone Star and is out of the business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
72modeler Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 High Planes Models has a very nice set of corrected cowlings for the Matchbox Privateer kit that have beautifully detailed engines, cowl flaps, and the correct small upper carburetor intake and larger lower oil cooler intake; I think they are still available- stock number is: HPA072010. As mentioned above the PB4Y-2 had the turbosuperchargers deleted, so the recess into which they were fitted needs to be filled in. If you can lay your hands on the Cobra conversion set, it is well worth getting, as it is very comprehensive and has everything needed to make the Matchbox kit into an accurate model, True Details also made a set of vacform transparencies for the PB4Y-2 that I think are also still available- they are really necessary to replace the ones in the Matchbox kit. Maybe, if they ever branch out to doing a large multi-engined kit, Valom will do one in 1/72, as I don't see anybody else making one, as it is limited to two basic color schemes and use by mainly the USN and Aeronavale. I would also recommend the Ginter PB4Y-2 Privateer monograph, as it has everything you could possibly want or need in order to build an accurate model. Mike 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWM Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Interesting infos on aftermarket parts. I have to seriously consider buying them... So far I was thinking on scratch correction, especially on engines which really looks not good... Regards J-W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denford Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, 72modeler said: High Planes Models has a very nice set of corrected cowlings for the Matchbox Privateer kit that have beautifully detailed engines, cowl flaps, and the correct small upper carburetor intake and larger lower oil cooler intake; I think they are still available- stock number is: HPA072010. Unfortunately these are one-piece with a rather unreal cylindrical depression (don't know how else to describe it) between the cowling front and the engine. The purist may wish to remove the engines entirely and 'clean out' the cowling. Replacement engines (white metal or resin) aren't hard to come by and should improve the appearance. The Cobra 'Detail Set' I referred to above, has separate engines and cowlings. I like the thought of Valom tooling it. There are actually more colour (or should it be color) schemes than you suggest. Firetruck red for target aircraft, and 3 tone or overall dark blue for French and Chinese Nationalist users. Edited January 27, 2020 by Denford Note re colours 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
72modeler Posted January 27, 2020 Share Posted January 27, 2020 Yep- when I got the Cobra set, I sold off my Airwaves and High Planes Privateer cowlings- the Airwaves cowlings weren't much better than the original kit cowlings- it looked like they just used one of the kit cowlings as a master and filled in one of the intakes so it was smaller- BIG disappointment! 😞 Mike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dogsbody Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 Though these are pictures from the Boeing XPBB-1 Ranger, they are the same turret. Chris 4 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MilneBay Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 (edited) I built the Matchbox kit ten years ago, or actually used it as a basis for a scratch build of all the bits it missed. There are many problems with the kit, not the least of which is the totally erroneous depiction of the side blister guns, and all the turrets' interiors for that matter. Which is important because these interiors are clearly visible unlike the cockpit area which required far less work. Probably the hardest part were the side blisters which required the complete fabrication of the interiors so that externally they didn't look like some chap just stood there and hosed at enemy aircraft as he would in a B17. I admit to giving up when I got to the engines. Edited January 28, 2020 by MilneBay 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Britman Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 I am surprised at the rough ride the Matchbox kit appears to be getting here. When it first came out it was more than passable , not least the very subject was more than acceptable. It is a very good base for what ever standard one wishes to produce . It's called modelling. Keith 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graham Boak Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 When it came out there was no internet, and most published comments came from either adverts or magazine columns that never gave any significant criticism to anything. And it was four decades back. But there were those of us who were greatly disappointed then, and that is why conversions to correct problem areas have proliferated down these decades. But they have come mainly from the US, were difficult to get hold of and unavoidably involving large prices for many bits. Yes, it's all modelling. So is starting from a lump of balsa. But it shouldn't be surprising to find modellers in modern times feeling that a kit which was a fairly poor attempt for the 1980s just doesn't cut the mustard today. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWM Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 On Scalemets you can look at all (?) aftermarket elements available for Privater https://www.scalemates.com/pl/kits/revell-04292-pb4y-2-privateer--102252 Namelly examples of cowling/engines by Final Touch by High Planet Models by Cobra Company And a true thing (at Pima Museum) Cheers J-W 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
72modeler Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 J-W, Looks like High Planes, Cobra, and Final Touch noticed that the magnetos on the PB4Y-2's R-1830-94 engines were located at the front of the engine, not the rear, as shown in the excellent photo you posted. I'm guessing Pima fitted a different version from that fitted to wartime airplanes. IIRC, the Lone Star PB still had the QEC R-2600 B-25 radials and props it got when it was a fire bomber when I saw it before the hurricane and subsequent sale to Pima. Mike Mike 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stressy Posted January 28, 2020 Author Share Posted January 28, 2020 Thanks for all this info. It changes my plans completely! Now what to do with the Academy B24J given I've just got a Hasegawa B24D and I've just not enough room for all three! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
72modeler Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 2 hours ago, Stressy said: Now what to do with the Academy B24J Don't let @tonyot find out you've got a spare! (I think he's only halfway through the RAAF/Coastal Command Liberator inventory at this point!) 😜 Seriously, I don't think you'll have much trouble selling or trading it, as none of the Academy B-24's have been re-released as of yet, or have been re-boxed by anybody else. Mike 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71chally Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 16 hours ago, MilneBay said: I built the Matchbox kit ten years ago... What a superb build. I remember (about 30 years ago!) this to be an absolute pig of a kit to build but was drawn in by the fabulous Huxley boxart and finishing it in a French Indo -China scheme. Apart from other things I seem to remember the turret, or alternative plain, side panels to be badly fitting and being very hard to fill and correct. Absolute respect to Matchbox for producing it though, and still the only game in town. You have worked magic there! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWM Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 3 hours ago, Stressy said: Thanks for all this info. It changes my plans completely! Now what to do with the Academy B24J given I've just got a Hasegawa B24D and I've just not enough room for all three! A conversion to: 1. LB30? 2. Liberator I 3. C87 4. C109 It is of course besides selling it... I am going to do 5 Liberators: Two RAF CC (Mk I and Mk V with rockets) , B 24 M, C 87 and Priveteer. The room is other question... Regards J-W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyot Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 49 minutes ago, 72modeler said: Don't let @tonyot find out you've got a spare! (I think he's only halfway through the RAAF/Coastal Command Liberator inventory at this point!) 😜 Seriously, I don't think you'll have much trouble selling or trading it, as none of the Academy B-24's have been re-released as of yet, or have been re-boxed by anybody else. Mike LOL,.... you forgot the RCAF too Mike,.... and I have at least one SAAF one planned too!! 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
72modeler Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 Ooh- that's a bit of awr right, guv'nor! Mike 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWM Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 4 hours ago, 72modeler said: Looks like High Planes, Cobra, and Final Touch noticed that the magnetos on the PB4Y-2's R-1830-94 engines were located at the front of the engine, not the rear, as shown in the excellent photo you posted. I'm guessing Pima fitted a different version from that fitted to wartime airplanes. IIRC, the Lone Star PB still had the QEC R-2600 B-25 radials and props it got when it was a fire bomber when I saw it before the hurricane and subsequent sale to Pima. Mike Of course a museum machine is not a reference in all details. The Privateers as firebombers has often completly modified engines: Cheers J-W Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JWM Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 10 minutes ago, tonyot said: LOL,.... you forgot the RCAF too Mike,.... and I have at least one SAAF one planned too!! Very nice Liberator. I have question os about the code letter - is it sky? The darkness of it looks similar to "T" on Sea Otter JM 772 (SEAC, Ceylon) which I am just finishing. Do you think it can be also sky? J-W 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonyot Posted January 28, 2020 Share Posted January 28, 2020 48 minutes ago, JWM said: Very nice Liberator. I have question os about the code letter - is it sky? The darkness of it looks similar to "T" on Sea Otter JM 772 (SEAC, Ceylon) which I am just finishing. Do you think it can be also sky? J-W A far as I can remember the codes were Medium Sea Grey mate. Glad you like it. I would go for MSG on your Otter,..... although it is hard to judge without a photo,...... it may also be white? 57 minutes ago, 72modeler said: Ooh- that's a bit of awr right, guv'nor! Mike LOL,.... thanks Mike! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RC Boater Bill Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 On 1/27/2020 at 1:33 PM, 72modeler said: Maybe, if they ever branch out to doing a large multi-engined kit, Valom will do one in 1/72, as I don't see anybody else making one, as it is limited to two basic color schemes and use by mainly the USN and Aeronavale. The US Coast Guard also flew them, from 1945 to 1958.... https://cgaviationhistory.org/aircraft_/consolidated-p4y-2g-privateer/ -Bill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now