Jump to content

Blackburn's addict ?? Get in for a Firebrand !!


Recommended Posts

Hello Dears !

One more lunacy from CC, You both know that I'm found of the Blackburn made beauties !!

You know what ?? There's one cure !! Buy and build !!

First a pic of my tiny village soaked in the fog for all the day...

IMG_20200125_172259

The church only is getting out of this sea of clouds !

IMG_20200125_172720

Ardennes cold... 0° and moisture :cold:

Well let's talk about this one, far less bucolic !!

royal-navy-blackburn-firebrand-dd815-air-to-air-the-aviation-photo-company

I buy this kit at SMW, I would have a Mk V too but my wallet say "Stay quiet you stupid CC"...

I had missed a 1/48 TSR 2, so... It's a kind of candy for me !

First resin kit for me too, I know, I know, I've told that I would'nt start another kit, but now, Crisp @Ex-FAAWAFU has entered the game...

one temptation too far...:crap:

IMG_20191124_202435

Here's the box !!

72311046_506858910094245_5674580387125264384_n

I wait now to see the Blackburn Shark... Next year as they said

It look like a good kit, I'm amazed, let's have a look

Destruction sheet is at least basic !!

IMG_20200125_205913

But the low number of parts do permit it !

IMG_20200125_205926

Paint scheme is limited to one aircraft, there hes been only 12 builts after all

IMG_20200125_210334

half fuselages and landing gear in white metal, no bubbles, precise mouldings, look good !!

Tailplane and wheel wells doors

IMG_20200125_210428

Really thin parts and sharp edges !!

Wings

IMG_20200125_210523

In two parts since this one is to be a folded wing one

I don't know if I will use this, the knob is reinforced with metal but the wing is heavy...

Now that will be sad not to use these detailled wingfolds.

IMG_20200125_210530

Parts are packed in tiny plastic bags but no one is broken !! Until now... :worry:

IMG_20200125_230129

huh, gun barrels  are not well finished, but it will be easily fixed !!

The fit is better than on some injected kits !! 

IMG_20200125_210809

Look good to me !!

Now will I use use thje cockpit as such ??

IMG_20200125_230139

It look a bit too small !!

I will now search for more pics of "Da Beast" before making a decision !!

May be that the Admiral will jump in the blackburn's poole once again now !! 

You know I'm talking about ?? @Martian Hale or maybe our Dear @general melchett

Who Know ??

This one is interesting too since I must have some Yellow P somewhere...

 

THE ROYAL NAVY DURING THE SECOND WORLD WAR

But this ons suffered of a crash, pilot killed...

Now guys !!

A sound advice.. CC approved !!

73358341_2670833226335871_7672345722909360128_n

:rofl2::rofl2:

Have a great sunday !!

Sincerely.

CC

  • Like 17
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, limeypilot said:

I thought you were trying to clear your shelf of half built kits?

Must be the Chimay.....

 

Ian

Sure it is...

 

8 hours ago, general melchett said:

Seems a pretty reasonable kit of a typically aesthetically-challenged Blackburn design, CC. Looks like a Yak-7 was rear ended (hard) by a Piston Provost before being side-swiped by a Defiant and gently nudged by an early Spit. Wonderfully awkward....look forward to progress.

Great definition my Dear General !

Now I'm looking for pics of the beast !

Aaaand one big push !! well... Almost !!

 

Sincerely.

CC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

CC,

 

Here are some photos of the prototype and early versions you might mot have seen:

https://aircraft.fandom.com/wiki/Blackburn_Firebrand?file=797px-The_Royal_Navy_during_the_Second_World_War_A14851.jpg

 

https://www.worthpoint.com/worthopedia/blackburn-firebrand-13-original-310543432

 

https://twitter.com/navalairhistory/status/968549865109237762

 

I will be watching your build with great anticipation- I took the coward's way out and have the 1/72 injected Valom kit.

Mike

 

Edited by 72modeler
added text
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 9 months later...
11 hours ago, corsaircorp said:

I cleaned up the fuselage halves !

About time too, where've you been for the last nine months? Not on this thread, that I can see. ;) :D

Nice to see some action here CC, this is one of those really quirky jobs that fascinate me rather a lot. :)

Steve.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevehnz said:

About time too, where've you been for the last nine months? Not on this thread, that I can see. ;) :D

Nice to see some action here CC, this is one of those really quirky jobs that fascinate me rather a lot. :)

Steve.

You're right, I was Mustangizing and Hurricanizing !!

We gonna give a push on this one !!

And the Phantom too !!

Thanks for the kind words Steve !!

Sincerely.

CC

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, corsaircorp said:

, I was Mustangizing and Hurricanizing

I knew that. ;) but everyone does those ones, ok, maybe not so well & with as much fun but how many people do a Firebrand 2? This is much more important. :D

Steve.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/26/2020 at 6:56 AM, general melchett said:

Seems a pretty reasonable kit of a typically aesthetically-challenged Blackburn design, CC.

"You see Joey..... When a Hawker Sea Fury and a Martin Mauler love each other very, very much...."

  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, David H said:

"You see Joey..... When a Hawker Sea Fury and a Martin Mauler love each other very, very much...."

That's a very very good one !! :rofl2::rofl2:

I will finally use the original internals, it looked under dimensioned 

See here compared with Boomerang and P-39 seats

IMG_20201127_221955

And like her mother the Sea Fury, A tiny cramped cockpit in a Huuuuge aircraft..

Deal sealed !! let's go !!

More to come soon !!

CC

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Now, it's just to reassure Steve...

Primer's on, paintnig started...

I finally will use the box interior, as far as I know, it's a good one !!

IMG_20210124_001340

More to come soon !!

Stay safe Gents, and happy modelling sunday !!

CC

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevehnz said:

Wow, that is a lot of resin. I hope you're doing this with safety shoes on, drop that lot on your foot & you'll hobble for a month . ;) :D

Steve.

My fear too ...🤣

More seriously, I hope that their peg will sustain the weight of the wing...

Fingers crossed !!

CC

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Grey Beema said:

Nothing wrong with Blackburn aircraft, I have a sleek and svelte Skua on the bench at the moment....  Looks fast even when sitting still...

As I always told it !!

Which paint scheme ? Ronnie Hay ?

I'm going to see it !

CC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would that be a Mk.I or a Mk.2?  The centre-section was widened on a Mk.2 to squeeze the torpedo in .  I have a Valom 1/72 Mk.2 which I'd prefer to make as a Mk.1, but so far have not done The Right Thing.  (No-one is ever going to see it or know...)  However as the first Firebrand didn't fly until 1942, you might like to reconsider your scheme.

 

I feel the Firebrand totally disproved the "if it looks good, it is good" myth.  Mind you, the Firebrand only looks good if you can't see the gawky wing.  The real engineering saying is that "if it is right, it'll look right".  It was one of the last designs to suffer from the Admiralty's insistence on a low approach speed, something completely overlooked when they had to adopt US types.  Which unsurprisingly were smaller, simpler  and lighter.  Not that I think this completely absolves Blackburn of shame.

 

Somewhere low on my list of priorities is a Typhoon conversion to the Firebrand spec, but with Hawker's own (and a completely separate study) slightly larger outer wings.  And Fowler flaps.    Mind you, if the Barracuda needed a Griffon, what could it have done with a Sabre?  (Answer: nothing in the same timescale.)

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Grey Beema said:

Lt Cmdr JM Bruen, bit of a S1E, TSS transition scheme Jul/Aug 1940.

 

At the paint throwing stage at the moment.  I’ll post when it’s a bit more done..

Good, let me know when you publish it.

 

8 hours ago, Graham Boak said:

Would that be a Mk.I or a Mk.2?  The centre-section was widened on a Mk.2 to squeeze the torpedo in .  I have a Valom 1/72 Mk.2 which I'd prefer to make as a Mk.1, but so far have not done The Right Thing.  (No-one is ever going to see it or know...)  However as the first Firebrand didn't fly until 1942, you might like to reconsider your scheme.

 

I feel the Firebrand totally disproved the "if it looks good, it is good" myth.  Mind you, the Firebrand only looks good if you can't see the gawky wing.  The real engineering saying is that "if it is right, it'll look right".  It was one of the last designs to suffer from the Admiralty's insistence on a low approach speed, something completely overlooked when they had to adopt US types.  Which unsurprisingly were smaller, simpler  and lighter.  Not that I think this completely absolves Blackburn of shame.

 

Somewhere low on my list of priorities is a Typhoon conversion to the Firebrand spec, but with Hawker's own (and a completely separate study) slightly larger outer wings.  And Fowler flaps.    Mind you, if the Barracuda needed a Griffon, what could it have done with a Sabre?  (Answer: nothing in the same timescale.)

It will be a Mk 2 As it is shown on the box (art)

I'm looking for a Mk 4 but I'll wait for the plastic injected one, I forget the name of the brand...

Now that you tell it, I'll have a closer look...

Whatever, I'm a great fan of the Blackburn production

I still pray the gods of Styrene for having a 1/48 Blackburn Blackburn....

The kind of kit that can make me my promises....

The guy of Combat kit said that they worked on a Blackburn Shark...

Fingers and toes crossed...

 

7 hours ago, TonyOD said:

This is going to be good. I built the Valom Firebrand years ago. The 1/72 kit that looks like a 1/48 kit.

Yup these birds are huge....

I took some comparatives pics...

 

Thanks for the kind words !!

I will go search in my files...

Sincerely.

CC

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Graham Boak said:

"if it looks good, it is good" myth.

Then how does that account for the Fairey Spearfishe being such a dud? Positively sexy and sultry next to a Firebrand Mk 2! :giggle:

Mike

 

https://www.militaryfactory.com/aircraft/detail.asp?aircraft_id=1205

 

https://ww2aircraft.net/forum/threads/fairey-spearfish.47199/

Edited by 72modeler
corrected spelling
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 72modeler said:

Then how that that account for the Fairey Spearfishe being such a dud?

 

I don't know that it was a dud, as opposed to just unnecessary.  But if it was, then surely this demonstrates that the saying is a myth.  Aircraft can look good and be awful.  They can also look fairly weird at first but if they work then people get used to them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I try to be gentle...

The naughty corner call me back...

Now, I need a 1/48 Spearfish too...:rofl2:

They designed it... And the Albacore... And the famous Barracuda too

Shhh, I will not talk about the Swordfish since she's been designed by a .... Belgian  :evil_laugh:

Sincerely.

CC

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...