Tbolt Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 Wingsy's E also needs to be added. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Poultney Posted December 2, 2021 Author Share Posted December 2, 2021 (edited) If you want this thread keeping up to date to date, probably best that someone more knowledgeable in 109s than myself starts a new one. Edited December 2, 2021 by Adam Poultney Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fishplanebeer Posted December 2, 2021 Share Posted December 2, 2021 When considering which 'Emil' to build in 72nd scale it's a bit of a no brainer now thanks to the excellent Special Hobby kits that blow everything else out of the water IMHO, including the latest AZ examples. Regards Colin. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dov Posted December 3, 2021 Share Posted December 3, 2021 Ha, this is a good idea: Myself built 48 & 32 all variants. Anyway: I am burnt from Eduard Gustavs. Wrong, less wrong, no choice. See my thread on this matter. Most impressive is Wingsy in 48. AMG is no choice, same quality as Clasic Airframe. In 32 just ZM maybe correct. But, life is more complicated: I have all technical papers from Gustavs. All versions. Approx. 1000 pages printed. So, if you check s Gustav: Most kit manfactors do not explain what variant, sub variant sub-sub variant they do. The sub variants are a jungle by itself just on the engine and cowling matter only! Do not get lost on weapons. Secondary issue! Believe me, in this matter you get lost easily. Even as an engineer with lots of knowledge, after 3 decades of modelling, I gave up. I use all Eduard kits, well knowing all of them has flaws. Really, if I say ha, this kit is correct, I am 100% sure, it takes some time and I notice the flaw or error unseen before. I started to ignore it, otherwise you get crazy! As I said, Wingsy is most promising. I have other japanese kits from Wingsy, they all are excellent. Clean, well detailed superior to all known companies. Do not get mad! Thd cowling issue and engine issue have the energy to drive you mad. Get your energy to achievr a correct smooth camo! Most modeller can not do it properly. But here on this forum this way an issue some weeks before. Italian 109 perfect done in RFI. Happy modelling Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skyraider3D Posted December 31, 2021 Share Posted December 31, 2021 (edited) On 12/22/2019 at 8:30 PM, Adam Poultney said: Hispano Buchon 1/72 1/48 1/32 Those are some notable blanks! For 1/48 and 1/32 your only accurate option would be your favourite Bf 109 G kit (for 1/32 the Hasegawa or Revell kits are best, for 1/48 best use the Tamiya kit) together with the SBS conversion set, which I helped design. The set is spot on accurate, unlike any previous kit or conversion. I hope an 1/72 set is to follow, but this is outside of my control. https://www.sbsmodel.com/search/buchon Note there are Tripala conversions as well. https://www.sbsmodel.com/search/tripala Edited December 31, 2021 by Skyraider3D 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wm Blecky Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 (edited) On 12/2/2021 at 3:43 PM, fishplanebeer said: When considering which 'Emil' to build in 72nd scale it's a bit of a no brainer now thanks to the excellent Special Hobby kits that blow everything else out of the water IMHO, including the latest AZ examples. Regards Colin. Those Special Hobby 109e kits are not exactly "no brainers". Their biggest, most visible flaws are the too wide canopy and too long undercarriage legs that feature downspouts for brake lines. Tamiya's kit still holds it's own. If the slightly too short fuselage bothers one, you can substitute an ICM fuselage or cut the Tamiya fuselage and lengthen it. Whether you chose the Special Hobby kit or Tamiya, both are excellent kits, each requiring some tweaking. Edited January 2, 2022 by Wm Blecky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Denford Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 13 hours ago, Wm Blecky said: Those Special Hobby 109e kits are not exactly "no brainers". Their biggest, most visible flaws are the too wide canopy and too long undercarriage legs that feature downspouts for brake lines. Though I must admit to not having 'seen' the kit, surely the length of the undercarriage leg depends on the weight it must bear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alt-92 Posted January 2, 2022 Share Posted January 2, 2022 1 hour ago, Denford said: surely the length of the undercarriage leg depends on the weight it must bear. If it's designed/moulded as extended or even unloaded, like the Academy P-47s do... It is quite noticable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now