Jump to content
This site uses cookies! Learn More

This site uses cookies!

You can find a list of those cookies here: mysite.com/cookies

By continuing to use this site, you agree to allow us to store cookies on your computer. :)

Slater

Bell Helicopter's "Invictus" prototype

Recommended Posts

Good to see that they are recycling the Comanche design. The US Army will need something to replace the Apache, once their current fleet starts falling apart.

 

Chris.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Better looking than the Comanche although you can see the resemblance 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My dad worked on the Comanche project at the Pentagon in the mid-90's. Will be very interesting to see how far this actually goes and what they've done to make it more contemporary indeed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently it’s a low cost design that’s not low-observable. No relationship to Sikorsky’s Comanche as this is by Bell. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep. Think of it as a OH-58-style light attack and scout/FAC aircraft rather than an Apache/Comanche replacement.

3 hours ago, GMK said:

Apparently it’s a low cost design that’s not low-observable. No relationship to Sikorsky’s Comanche as this is by Bell. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Alan P said:

Yep. Think of it as a OH-58-style light attack and scout/FAC aircraft rather than an Apache/Comanche replacement.

 

 

Too big to and way off the mark for an OH-58- style airframe. Think more of a medium category. 

 

https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/30136/no-bells-invictus-armed-scout-helicopter-isnt-stealth-but-it-aims-to-be-fast-and-cheap

 

There's a lot I've read about this concept so far out of what's available for the moment and I'm still trying to get down all of my thoughts for it. For now however the thing I would consider the most is a) survivability, i.e. small-medium arms damage, b) maneuverability, and c) noise. And that's just the aircraft itself, not considering the budget availability as of yet. The problem with the US Army (primarily however all the services are guilty of it, looking at you USAF.) is that they try to reinvent the wheel everytime there's a new requirement produced. Since budget is going to be a concern for future procurements why not use what's available oof the shelf like an updated MH/AH-6.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 10/3/2019 at 8:09 PM, Alan P said:

Yep. Think of it as a OH-58-style light attack and scout/FAC aircraft rather than an Apache/Comanche replacement.

 

The Comanche was meant to replace the OH-58. Reconnaissance/Attack - RAH-66

 

I see the resemblance to the Comanche but that was a Boeing-Sikorsky design, I doubt the Invictus is related!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, k5054nz said:

The Comanche was meant to replace the OH-58. Reconnaissance/Attack - RAH-66

 

I see the resemblance to the Comanche but that was a Boeing-Sikorsky design, I doubt the Invictus is related!

True, and definitely not!

 

Alan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Had an opportunity to look at the mockup last week - very much OH-58 size (or Long Ranger, perhaps). 
 

XXilKqt.jpg


gFB1KJC.jpg

 

zsnqHjx.jpg

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...