LorenSharp Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 Never tried a paper model before that would be different.The XF-103 is just good old fashioned heavy micropitted resin. NIce thing with the GB is I have plenty of time to research , plan, and plot how any ,or all will be constructed. Hopefully without losing the plot😜 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkSH Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 I've decided to go with the Airfix 1/48 Javelin, I looked at doing the Airfix 1/48 Lightning but have found the fuselage to be quite badly warped, I'll have a look at correcting it but for now the Flying Flatiron is the primary choice. Mark. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 (edited) 22 hours ago, Col. said: Another fine choice of subject Tony If, as an aside, if anyone is considering the various types used in the 'Top Gun' dissimilar air combat training role such as the A-4 then they are good for this GB as well Not agree about 'Top Gun' because key word "training role". But if anybody wants A-4 interceptor maybe he's pay attention to the New Zealand A-4K? How I know it's only one specific modification A-4 for intercept. Also was Australia A-4G modernized as an interceptor for the ability to carry out air defense of the fleet. 19 hours ago, LorenSharp said: Yes I hope so if time permits.Actually Col. I had a 3rd one though it didn't get past the mock-up stage an XF-103 Thunderwarrior A Collect aire I've been staring at on the shelf for ages looking for a good excuse to bring to the light of day. Idle hands as they say. From Collect Aire maybe maked excellent model: https://www.dishmodels.ru/gshow.htm?p=12140 B.R. Serge Edited January 29, 2020 by Aardvark 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enzo the Magnificent Posted January 29, 2020 Share Posted January 29, 2020 11 hours ago, Col. said: That's another fine option you have with the XF-103 as paper projects are also eligible within this GB. I've heard that Collect Aire kits can be troublesome. If it's doubtful that you can complete it within the GB timescale, there is an option. They Also Serve runs for the whole year. You could dedicate the build to the Anything But Injection GB. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ale85 Posted January 30, 2020 Share Posted January 30, 2020 lovely gb! i'm in! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted January 30, 2020 Author Share Posted January 30, 2020 5 hours ago, Ale85 said: lovely gb! i'm in! Delighted to have your company Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kallisti Posted February 3, 2020 Share Posted February 3, 2020 On 1/29/2020 at 7:32 PM, Aardvark said: Not agree about 'Top Gun' because key word "training role". But if anybody wants A-4 interceptor maybe he's pay attention to the New Zealand A-4K? How I know it's only one specific modification A-4 for intercept. Also was Australia A-4G modernized as an interceptor for the ability to carry out air defense of the fleet. From Collect Aire maybe maked excellent model: https://www.dishmodels.ru/gshow.htm?p=12140 B.R. Serge Paint it white and we are back at the Angel Interceptor again from Captain Scarlet which loaded the pilot from underneath! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andwil Posted March 1, 2020 Share Posted March 1, 2020 On 12/27/2019 at 11:03 AM, Andwil said: I have a couple of Airfix Lightnings in the stash so I’d like to join the fun with at least one of them. AW And if I can get it/them finished in time I also have a couple of Me-163 Komets in the stash..... AW 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted March 1, 2020 Author Share Posted March 1, 2020 1 hour ago, Andwil said: And if I can get it/them finished in time I also have a couple of Me-163 Komets in the stash..... AW That would make for an interesting comparison of solutions to the interceptor requirement if you do get the four done 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted March 3, 2020 Share Posted March 3, 2020 On 3/1/2020 at 12:59 PM, Col. said: That would make for an interesting comparison of solutions to the interceptor requirement if you do get the four done You about, All four Me-163: - Me-163A - Me-163B - Me-163C - Me-163D ????? 😉😁 If seriously, it's really interesting comparison evolution Me-163, but this comparison very difficult maked, because no good and accurate Me-163A (Aerodrom/Condor/Special Hobby - wrong) also no not only good model Me-163D, no any real view Me-163D, only poor photo with case. And ofcource comparison evolution Me-163 was not fully without Ju-248/Me-263, but this type also have many questions with drawings. B.R. Serge P.S. I talk as owners: - Me-163A Condor; - Me-163B Academy; - Me-163C Special Hobby - Me-263 Broplan/Special Hobby/MicroMir 😎 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted March 4, 2020 Author Share Posted March 4, 2020 22 hours ago, Aardvark said: You about, All four Me-163: I was thinking of a pair of Me-163 in comparison to a pair of English Electric Lightning as two very different and yet similar solutions to the same requirement hardly 20 years apart 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 18 minutes ago, Col. said: I was thinking of a pair of Me-163 in comparison to a pair of English Electric Lightning as two very different and yet similar solutions to the same requirement hardly 20 years apart I know, but can I make a joke? 😉 The thing that Lightning and Comet have in common is that they are both interceptors, but there are a lot of differences. B.R. Serge 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TommyF Posted March 4, 2020 Share Posted March 4, 2020 Really like the idea of this GB - I have a couple of Japanese WW2 interceptors in mind - very much up for it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted March 4, 2020 Author Share Posted March 4, 2020 2 hours ago, Aardvark said: I know, but can I make a joke? 😉 The thing that Lightning and Comet have in common is that they are both interceptors, but there are a lot of differences. B.R. Serge Ah, of course Serge, and all four versions of the Komet as well if you wish 2 hours ago, TommyF said: Really like the idea of this GB - I have a couple of Japanese WW2 interceptors in mind - very much up for it. Cool. I've added your name to the list Still 8 months to go before we start so plenty of time to pick a particular subject... or add more to the stash 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 (edited) 9 hours ago, Col. said: and all four versions of the Komet as well if you wish Sorry, but no! After 2014 I do not want to visualize the achievements of the Nazis in technology on my part, besides the creation of the accurate Me-163A from Aerodrom/Condor/Special Hobby is a very hard, difficult and time-consuming task. Me-163B from Academy at the best, especially with photoetched, Me-163C from Special Hobby requires effort and some work with hands in cockpit and ski bay for best results. Real view Me-163D unknown. Agree, there is a big difference in the interpretation of this single photo: with Japan side: and with A.L . Bentley: Recourse: https://www.albentley-drawings.com/drawings/german-aircraft/messerschmitt-163/messerschmitt-me163d/ Of course A.L Bentley famous and and an authoritative expert, but his interpretation of the Me-163D is so monstrously ugly that it is hard to believe in it. And as you may see on drawings A.L Bentley not a small window after canopy, but this small window you may see on photo real Me-163D! B.R. Serge Edited March 5, 2020 by Aardvark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted March 5, 2020 Author Share Posted March 5, 2020 8 hours ago, Aardvark said: Sorry, but no! After 2014 I do not want to visualize the achievements of the Nazis in technology on my part... That's fair enough Serge. Our hobby is not good if we cannot enjoy it and find discomfort in the subjects we choose. 9 hours ago, Aardvark said: ...besides the creation of the accurate Me-163A from Aerodrom/Condor/Special Hobby is a very hard, difficult and time-consuming task. Me-163B from Academy at the best, especially with photoetched, Me-163C from Special Hobby requires effort and some work with hands in cockpit and ski bay for best results. Real view Me-163D unknown. Agree, there is a big difference in the interpretation of this single photo: with Japan side: and with A.L . Bentley: Recourse: https://www.albentley-drawings.com/drawings/german-aircraft/messerschmitt-163/messerschmitt-me163d/ Of course A.L Bentley famous and and an authoritative expert, but his interpretation of the Me-163D is so monstrously ugly that it is hard to believe in it. And as you may see on drawings A.L Bentley not a small window after canopy, but this small window you may see on photo real Me-163D! Bentley does make the 163D look as if Wile E Coyote bought it from ACME to chase Roadrunner in the cartoon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted March 5, 2020 Share Posted March 5, 2020 3 hours ago, Col. said: That's fair enough Serge. Our hobby is not good if we cannot enjoy it and find discomfort in the subjects we choose. This is somewhat different. I believe that for yourself you can do anything in your home, but when you exhibit it on the Internet, at the exhibition you show that it is permissible and in this way you legalize it, you translate it into the category of ordinary things. Why is this dangerous? Here comes the model store dad with his son, in order to buy the first model for the child. Suppose they want to buy something from the WW2 period. What do you think the child is most likely to choose if they are offered R-51, Spitfire, IL-2 and Flying Disk Hannebu II from Luft'46? I think that the child will choose a flying disk, because it looks unusual, like a super-weapon, but not like all these Mustangs, Spitfire and IL-2. Of course, this does not mean that this child will certainly become a nazi in the future, but there will be nothing wrong with nazism, because as an adult he will remember his dad and how they built this Luft'46. That is, the goal has been achieved and for this child and many of these children the legalization of nazism will take place and they will no longer see anything wrong with this. This is my personal opinion. But of course, maybe I just have old-fashioned beliefs. 4 hours ago, Col. said: Bentley does make the 163D look as if Wile E Coyote bought it from ACME to chase Roadrunner in the cartoon 😁😁😁 Absolutely agree! After very aerodynamic clean Me-163C and not so clean but in its elegant Me-263, Me-163D from A.L.Bentley look as some kind of misunderstanding, FrankenComet some kind. 😁 B.R. Serge 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theplasticsurgeon Posted March 17, 2020 Share Posted March 17, 2020 On 6/5/2019 at 6:22 PM, theplasticsurgeon said: I'm in for this, Two F-15 Eagles (A and C), and an F-4D-1 Skyray, to choose from. My first choice build has changed to a Hasegawa Lightning F6 that I've just acquired. Blasting off from a blurred runway, with gear part way though the retraction cycle is the look I've got in mind. See you all in November, I'm also intending to be able to compare this build, with more recent Hasegawa and Revell offerings - and that from Frog! Those kits in the quote, still remain in my stash. Reserving the right to build more than one. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted March 17, 2020 Author Share Posted March 17, 2020 8 hours ago, theplasticsurgeon said: My first choice build has changed to a Hasegawa Lightning F6 that I've just acquired. Blasting off from a blurred runway, with gear part way though the retraction cycle is the look I've got in mind. See you all in November, I'm also intending to be able to compare this build, with more recent Hasegawa and Revell offerings - and that from Frog! Those kits in the quote, still remain in my stash. Reserving the right to build more that one. The Lightning is always a great first choice regardless of how good all the others on you list may be 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted March 22, 2020 Share Posted March 22, 2020 On 3/17/2020 at 4:02 PM, theplasticsurgeon said: changed to a Hasegawa Lightning F6 that I've just acquired. Blasting off from a blurred runway, with gear part way though the retraction cycle is the look I've got in mind. See you all in November, I'm also intending to be able to compare this build, with more recent Hasegawa and Revell offerings - and that from Frog! But Hasegawa/Revell re-pack & FROG/Revell re-pack it's twins brother! B.R. Serge 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevej60 Posted March 24, 2020 Share Posted March 24, 2020 I have a beautiful !/48 Tamiya F15A in the stash so add me to the list for this one please! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted March 24, 2020 Author Share Posted March 24, 2020 4 hours ago, stevej60 said: I have a beautiful !/48 Tamiya F15A in the stash so add me to the list for this one please! Welcome aboard Steve Although I'm sure your F-15 will be first project of many 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aardvark Posted March 24, 2020 Share Posted March 24, 2020 7 hours ago, stevej60 said: I have a beautiful !/48 Tamiya F15A First! First! In early camouflage blue FS 35450*/ Gloss blue FS 15450* and white fin code! 😍 ___________ * - may mistake with number FS. B.R. Serge 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jasonb13 Posted April 2, 2020 Share Posted April 2, 2020 This has possible already been asked, but does the MiG-21PFM qualify for this? Thanks! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Col. Posted April 2, 2020 Author Share Posted April 2, 2020 5 minutes ago, Jasonb13 said: This has possible already been asked, but does the MiG-21PFM qualify for this? Thanks! Yes it does. So long as you don't hang any bombs under it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now