Jump to content

Landgraf H-2 -1944, scratchbuild 1/72


Recommended Posts

A build from 10 years ago, and please blame "Head in the clouds" and "Pete in Lincs", who made me do it:

 

 

Somebody made a flying egg-beater?

Not at all. Since the beginnings of the rotary wing design, inventors realized that a twin rotor solved torque and stability problems. Well, some of them anyway.

Mr. Landgraf, from Los Angeles perpetrated this beauty.

The Landgraf H-2 rotors were overlapped and for that reason by force synchronized. The blades were not hinged but could vary pitch, while little “ailerons” provided cyclic control. The rudder was fixed, so for yaw it was stated that differential torque was supplied to the individual rotors –how was this done is for me a mystery, since they were coupled. The one-person machine was aimed to be easy to fly, which apparently accomplished. The “wings” were only streamlined pods, since they reputedly did not contribute to lift, being the CG far ahead them –for which they would have created a negative pitch force in case they did generate any lift in forward motion.

The model:

Two (upper and lower) halves were Mattel-formed on a previously Sculpey-made plug; the upper one in clear styrene. The 85 hp Pobjoy engine and front wheel are Aeroclub items, the other two wheels were scratched, since I couldn’t find ones of a suitable size. Interior structure and diverse elements were created, and for the rotor blades Contrail styrene “struts” were used -but the process of converting the raw airfoiled strip to a blade took some patience.  Each blade has a tiny “aileron” that was engraved. Since the original aircraft had retractable landing gear, recesses can be seen on the fuselage photos through which you can have a glimpse of the innards, thence the decision of putting the engine, some structure and the fuel tank in the model. The white metal engine also helped to balance the model avoiding any shameful tail-sitting.

The stubby “no-wings” were made of airfoiled styrene sheet as well as the rudder.

All in all about 80 parts were fabricated, perhaps a bit on the high side considering the minute dimensions of this windmilled tadpole.

Colors were applied as per a Mechanix Illustrated magazine color photo.

In one photo on the Flight archives a beautiful female model appears posing aside the aircraft, but my intents to get a model to pose with the model were in vain.

Doesn’t somehow remind you of the Jetsons?

32174670687_212b55c5e8_b.jpg

 

46202831475_5f888397c2_b.jpg

 

33241323958_f46bc91cd3_b.jpg

 

47116752171_37208e1636_b.jpg

 

46202831555_0f6f11c7f2_b.jpg

 

33241324108_52b80cbf1b_b.jpg

 

47116752391_4d73cf61a1_b.jpg

 

33241324648_a7e964fb62_b.jpg

 

47116752321_e10c08ba67_b.jpg

 

33241324518_f8b8352f08_b.jpg

 

46202831665_2179f82909_b.jpg

 

46202831585_65777ee649_b.jpg

 

33241324228_5d3315cb1b_b.jpg

 

46202831635_f703822582_b.jpg

 

47116752431_66be111376_b.jpg

 

33241324838_970960a03e_b.jpg

 

33241324988_efecebf1cc_b.jpg

 

  • Like 19
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, thank you @Head in the clouds. and @Pete in Lincs. I have a picture of this craft from an album my mother had in the '50s and all it says is "Flying Easter Egg" and goes on saying that's a common nickname for helicopters in the USA. Now I know what its true identity is. From a search a few years ago I thought it might be a Hiller or a Platt-LePage design, though I never found it.

 

@Moa, excellent rendition of a cute aircraft.

 

Cheers,

Wlad

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...