Jump to content

AZ Models' Douglas X-3 Stiletto


hsr

Recommended Posts

I don't usually do WIPs, but since this is a new kit and it has received some negative reviews:

http://www.kitreviewsonline.de/douglas-x-3-stiletto-im-massstab-172-von-az-model-az-7597/#more-41416

I thought I would do one so that those are interested can see my trials and tribulations. First the sprues of which there are 2:

DBoPIpYY_o.jpg

GxxY5HHH_o.jpg

Just ignore the Sidewinders, they are for a what-if boxing. There isn't a lot of flash but there is some and it is in awkward locations, like the slot for the wings

CY5rSYvT_o.jpg

 Next the transparency, which is...transparent:

WLQbYTpk_o.jpg

Decals, which look really good:

EJUo8Ylz_o.jpg

Finally the instructions, they are simple and some placement is vague but they are adequate

 sj49Fd2u_o.jpg

 

Following the instructions I assembled the cockpit, main wheel well and engine exhausts. Then I tried a dry fit, and nothing fit inside the fuselage. Not the wheel well

 80GgO4NZ_o.jpgThis is after I had already done some sanding. Not the cockpit

7ud1efh6_o.jpgAnd not the exhausts, which I didn't get a picture of. So out came the grinding tool and sanding sticks. In order to get the exhausts to fit I had to do major sanding to them and some grinding of the fuselage.

UycwRIIT_o.jpg

ESTUiLZr_o.jpgThey are mostly hidden so it isn't too bad. 

So after that I was able to button it all up;

PBclqTsn_o.jpg

rJ6jKhCk_o.jpg

 

The wings are just stuck in place and not glued, They are going to need some more work before they fit correctly. The canopy fit is OK, but there are gaps that will need to be filled

1xeChoG9_o.jpg

mTRO6vrw_o.jpg

 

That's it for now. Next will be seam filling on the fuselage and then attaching the wings. That will be in a couple days since I have another project to finish first. Thanks for looking.

  • Like 16
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprised to see you're having this much trouble with your kit. I just snagged an AZ Spitfire Mk.XVIe and it seems to fit nicely. Nice moulding also. It would appear that at times different people do different masters for some of these limited-run companies (and the bigger companies for that matter). Good luck with the rest of the kit. The X-3 is certainly a striking-looking aircraft.

 

Regards,

 

Jason

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello HSR,

Well AZ is Always that way, one is good and the second is a nightmare !

But usually, they fare better in 1/72 than in 1/48... Guess how I know it ….

Good job on your stilleto, May be some cristal clear for the canopy gaps ??

Sincerely.

CC

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the fit, this seems no worse than new tool Airfix 190A I did last year. Its an interesting subject so a little bit of work will be duly rewarded with suitable "oohs and aahs" when finished! Will be watching your progress as mine arrived yesterday and I stocked up on gap filling CA and checked my grinder bits...

 

Anil

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Learstang said:

Surprised to see you're having this much trouble with your kit. I just snagged an AZ Spitfire Mk.XVIe and it seems to fit nicely. Nice moulding also. It would appear that at times different people do different masters for some of these limited-run companies (and the bigger companies for that matter). Good luck with the rest of the kit. The X-3 is certainly a striking-looking aircraft.

The parts are molded pretty well. It is almost like different people mastered the fuselage and the internals and never shecked their work against each other.

 

1 hour ago, Courageous said:

The kit may heave been reviewed as being negative but we might see you pull the 'rabbit from the hat'.

It has its issues, but it is definitely buildable. I think I am past the worst of it (famous last words.)

 

Thanks all

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Dimiter said:

Here is a nice video that might help you with the build.

Interesting. The box shows the wings and stabilized as natural metal. This seems to show that at least when this video was made that the stabilizer was white. The instructions also show the wheel wells as zinc chromate green, but this and other photos I have seen indicate they were natural metal.

 

Thanks

Howard

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to say that I also have the Mach 2 kit and every time I have an issue with this one I think, maybe I should look at the Mach 2 kit again, and every time I do, I come back to this one and put the Mach 2 kit on the give-away pile

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, hsr said:

I have to say that I also have the Mach 2 kit and every time I have an issue with this one I think, maybe I should look at the Mach 2 kit again, and every time I do, I come back to this one and put the Mach 2 kit on the give-away pile

Mach 2 and Fonderie miniature….

Same breed of Piggy kit, but nobody else have done these aircraft….

Fully understand !!

CC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this may be a show stopper. I finished my UH-1B kit today and was planning on going back to this one tomorrow, but in the mean time I was looking it over and I discovered that the intake position on the right and left side don't match:

OiKzwto3_o.jpg

 

The left intake is higher on the fuselage then the right intake. 😱 The exhausts are level, but not the intakes.  I don't know how to fix that.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You need to remove the port intake part from the model, you can see from looking down the intake that it's internal face does not match the inside of the fuselage due to it being too long. Very gently start removing sections from the top of the intake. As you do so, the intake part will move inwards at the top, lowering it in relation to the starboard part. At the same time the intake will come closer to it's internat face matching thar of the fuselage interior. This done, fair in the external faces of the intake and the fuselage and re-scribe as necessary. There may be other methods but that is how I would go about it it. Have go; what have you got to lose?

 

Helpful of Mars 👽

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Martian Hale said:

You need to remove the port intake part from the model, you can see from looking down the intake that it's internal face does not match the inside of the fuselage due to it being too long...

Martin,

 

I see what you are saying. Both intake parts are too big, with the left one being much too big. But the even adjusting those parts the whole shape of the left intake is higher. Having said that you have given me the idea that I could reinstall the 2 parts so that they are more even and the fill and sand the rest of the sides to match. I'll have to sleep on it.

 

Thanks 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Kevin Callahan said:

Or, you could only take pictures from one side or the other...

I've thought of that too, and it might come to that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have mentioned the Mach 2 kit. I thought I would post a couple of comparison picks. According to Wikipedia the overall length should be 66' 9". The Mach 2 kit comes in at 64' according to my 1/72 ruler

IeNNMwo3_o.jpg

The AZ kit is ~66'

IFbZcyBi_o.jpg

 

But a much higher percentage of the Mach 2 kit is the pitot tube making the fuselage proper much shorter. Note the drawing is not 1/72 scale I am just showing it to show the overall shape which I thing the AZ kit gets better

4E5YZD4P_o.jpg

 

The Mach 2 kit also gets the main wheel wells wrong, having them as separate rather the a single transverse well. The AZ gets it right.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I spent the morning and part of the afternoon filling seams and sanding. I then attached the wings and vertical fin so I would have a frame of reference, and then attacked the intake problem. I first removed the pieces from the front of the intakes. Then I did some sanding on the top of the left intake to lower it and the bottom of the right intake to raise it. Luckily the plastic is thick enough that it can take a lot of sanding. I then repositioned the parts at the front of the intakes so they looked even. It will still need mor filling and sanding tomorrow when the glue dryis, but I think it looks a lot better.

JIAWOsOw_o.jpg

2c3S8Zl5_o.jpg

jjLW0kp1_o.jpg

 

Tomorrow I will finish with the intakes, blend in the wings and rudder, and if I am lucky get the stabilizers and landing gear on, and maybe give it a coat of primer. 🤞 

  • Like 12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Be careful with the canopy. It looks like mine went on a little crooked. We'll see what disaster happen when I go to install the landing gear.

Edited by hsr
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, hsr said:

Be careful with the canopy. It looks like mine went on a little crooked. We'll see what disaster happen when I go to install the landing gear.

It can't be any worse than those intakes or the fit of the fuselage halves.

 

Famous last words from Mars 👽

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...