Jump to content

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, perdu said:

Just a thought, as well as the Airfix Gnat I think I still have an Airfix JP4 in its starter kit guise...

 

Would it be terribly predictable of me to suggest that a little gnatty and/or a JP suitably perdu’d would increase the sum of human happiness?.......In which case utilitarian philosophy mandates that this is what you should do :whistle:

  • Haha 3
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Fritag said:

 

Would it be terribly predictable of me to suggest that a little gnatty and/or a JP suitably perdu’d would increase the sum of human happiness?.......In which case utilitarian philosophy mandates that this is what you should do :whistle:

Agreed. :) 

 

Ciao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have heard that this is an interesting parts-fit

 

Have seen nothing yet to disabuse me of that notion

 

Back-in-the-box...

 

P1010105.jpg

 

This will be an 'if I am a bit bored today build.

 

No WIP

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did mention hearing about 'fit' issues on the Gnat, sadly not to be avoided so not a shake and glue job

 

Dammit

16206603284128176017970328018397.jpg

 

I was right to wonder

The upper wing will not sit down onto the fuselage unit, good job I have needle files.

 

16206604066937570969462010595277.jpg

 

For a highly technical 'looking' mould this is awful

 

16206605225293027997461835699088.jpg

 

Bring on the files...

 

And the clamps

 

16206621230454809384106871733027.jpg

 

As this IS the S-61N build you will note that I found these strange little triangular pieces on my tattered old Airwaves etchyset

 

I was looking at a downloaded .PDF off the Big H website which gave me a detailed reminder of what was on their etch sheet

 

Upper 'drilled' triangular webs for the undercarriage of any Sea King variant, had to didn't I?

 

Now I need to order another one or two, 'cause the Eduard set doesn't even try to show these and I am embarrassed because I once knew these were on the Airwaves etch set but forgot.

 

:(

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, perdu said:

For a highly technical 'looking' mould this is awful

It seems to rely on making the cockpit floor sit as deep into its snug little locators as possible, but even then there are height issues where the wing unit sits over the back cockpit wall arch...

 

Proceeding carries on...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 weeks later...

 

Not everything flies around at 500 mph ish

 

This is still flavour of the month, but some things are not nice.

P1010181.jpg

 

I mean how shall I make this replicate this?

34067396160_335bace124_b.jpg

 

 

I do have this

P1010183.jpg

 

But I don't want to even consider that because I am seriously planning for

 

Putting these together and

P1010184.jpg

 

Making another S-61N with maybe Oirish markings and a rescue innards set...

 

Of course if I do I can consider using these on the BA Speedbird

 

P1010185.jpg

 

The rotor head is slightly less compromised than the elderly Airfix SH-3 one..
 

A long time ago our mate CedB sent me some spare CD jewel cases because I moaned that I was running out of vital raw materials for scratchbuilding.

 

Being cautious at the time, (don'tcha know  there's a warpandemic on?) I didn't open them when they came but put them in postoffice purdah in the garage.

 

Tonight, looking at the raw materials for another S-61N I finally opened the package.


Ced you old cynic you, no cracks or breaks anywhere.

 

Thank you immensely Ced, you are a gentleman.

 

A very generous one it must be said too.

 

P1010187.jpg

 

Oh well a can and some inessential telly await, catch you later folks.

  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, perdu said:

Not everything flies around at 500 mph ish

 

:hmmm: In which case I propose that it can’t really be called ‘flying’.  Perhaps meandering? (PS a jag attack run back in the day was 480kts = 550mph.  500mph? - pah :whistle:).

 

28 minutes ago, perdu said:

I mean  how shall I make this replicate this?

34067396160_335bace124_b.jpg

 

 

OMG.  To think  I have been carried about the place in something that required such complexity to fly meander 😱

 

In answer to the question Bill.  I dunno.  But I look forward with a keen sense of anticipation to whatever you choose to serve us up next :D

 

 

Edited by Fritag
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll bite. You be got me on the edge of my seat wondering how you're going to make a fully articulated rotor head from a CD case. I know you've pulled some rabbits out of the hat before Bill, but...

  • Haha 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Bill, I'm being facetious but maybe a ring of Goldilocks pan scourer for the rotorhead piping. Well from a distance it could look convincing!

 

Colin

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My crystal ball tells me that you have several miles of 5amp fuse wire and copious quantities of broken tiny drill bits in your immediate future.

 

Mystic Martian 👽

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, perdu said:

mean how shall I make this replicate this?

34067396160_335bace124_b.jpg

That looks very much like a Sea King folding head to me, with the big hinges and plethora of hydraulic lines for the blade fold system. Your S-61 head should be non-folding so a bit simpler. Simpler? Okay then - a bit less complex.

 

I haven't looked in on this thread for a while, but I see the cab is coming along nicely!

Jon

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many broken .03 drills you want M. Le Alien visitor?

 

This might explain my purchase, several (well a couple of..) years ago of 4 packs of fuse wire units.

 

I wonder where I put them...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I S H !

 

You lot worry me some times.

 

However in the spirit of cooperation and adventurous venture made famous in here I did give it a bit of a go.

 

Ridding myself of the fear of over-complication induced by that photo of a sea board Sea King with miracle foldybits all over it I tackled my mountain of S-61N and L pictures in search of wot it is up there

 

Which seems to be a setup including a device which seems to have rotor vibration reducing as its prime function that sits atop the actual rotor gear.

 

This has a name which has escaped from a minimised realm of captivity in my head and which I think I only heard of last year so I will call it the star shaped weighted device that sits atop the rotor ge...

 

Well you know, its on the rotor head here I think

 

P1010199.jpg

 

A crap picture I know but hey look it up for your self huh?

 

There is a star shaped thing with thick weights at each end, positioned over  the rotor gear, so I needed a star shaped thing from the spares.

I know let's use this, probably never get to use it on a model...

P1010188.jpg

 

Snip away the unwanted bits

 

P1010189.jpg

 

No - properly

 

P1010190.jpg

 

File some flats on each of those arms and put away for later, and begin modifying the Airfixery

 

A snip here a slice there...

P1010192.jpg

 

But please be careful with the delicate, elderly Airfix plastic...

P1010194.jpg

 

 

 

Ahhh

 

Oh well, on with the mot...

 

P1010195.jpg

 

Pentagonal star shape in location prior to adding the balance weights

 

And now to add the pitch change devices

P1010197a.jpg

 

Paint and trim those when the glue has dried, we might be on a reasonable copy of a win here.

 

Not forgetting the rectangular balance damper weights on the star shapy-thingy.

 

That is me for a bit, catch you all later.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, hendie said:

Nice reallocation of rotary bits Bill.  Simple but effective and adds a nice touch of visual "complexity' to the rotor head. 

I couldn't agree more! :clap:

 

Ciao 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me?

 

I was that unhappy.

 

Nothing to do with fussball either, the little blobby bits that comprise the damper set-up just were not convincing.

 

They needed to protrude from below the dome section atop the rotors so I had a rethink

P1010211.jpg

 

These little dobbets of @John Aerostrut materials were reduced from the aerodynamic shape to this blobby section.

 

Unfortunately my stuporgoo was unable to 'catch' on them and in fitting the stems fell off, boo.

 

In service there seems to have been two variants of counterweight, the above curvy ones and some other more angular block shapes.

 

I decided to go for the latter carved out of nice thick plasticard in the end.

P1010212.jpg

 

These are busy looking and stick out nicely from the upper dome.

 

P1010217.jpg

 

This looks like being the done deal, let's have us a quick looksee?

 

P1010218.jpg

 

Yep, that'll do.

 

Time for another bench purrups today...

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...