Jump to content

Russian Spitfire colors


Crane

Recommended Posts

as the others said, standard RAF DFS.

 

see also

http://massimotessitori.altervista.org/sovietwarplanes/board/index.php?topic=1683.0

 

I also finally noticed after years of looking at this pic that 'White 78'  is the 2nd plane, the '78' is just visible

 

spitfire-9.jpg

 

 

better shot of the white tail

 

26giap%20Litavrin_Matsievich_Scherbina.j

 

this maybe of some background interest

 

the VVS used Spitfire in PVO (Voyska protivovozdushnoy oboronystrany,) units, which were for  Air Defense Forces,  by the end of the war  and up until 1947!

IIRC Spitfire IX equipped something like 27 out of 81 PVO squadrons in 1945..  

 

see https://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/86024-what-happened-to-the-1200-soviet-spitfire-ix39s/

some usual misinformation, but this looks correct, which you might find interesting.

 

Quote

Most of the ~1200 Spitfire's delivered to the Soviet Union were used by the air defence forces (the PVO). The Spitfire with its turbocharged Merlin enjoyed high altitude performance that the indigenous Yakovlev and Lavochkin types could just not achieve, which is why the Soviets acquired the type to begin with (as the MiG-3 clearly could not be improved/developed to meet requirements satisfactorily). By 1944 it was the PVO's main type and would remain so until at least 1947.

 

Thus those Soviet Spitfire's were used more for interceptions and most often of high-altitude reconnaissance & bomber Axis aircraft. They didn't see much of where most of the Soviet's air war was fought; at low altitude and above the battlefield. Although these PVO-flown Spitfire's did often encounter German fighters and there were even some PVO Spitfire aces, their operations were not at the level of continual intensity that the regular Soviet red air force (the VVS) saw.

 

The VVS did however receive some of those ~1200 Spitfires IX's delivered. They were used mostly in the more high-altitude air war against the Finnish air force in Karelia.

 

And as for the opinion of Soviet pilots; Spitfire's initially had gained an unfortunate reputation amongst the Soviets for fragility. This was due to the VVS experience with using some Mk V's during air battles over the Kuban isthmus, where the undercarriage struggled to withstand the rigours of Soviet frontal airfields (and some were lost in accidents). Those VVS pilots also took some time adjusting to the wing-mounted machine guns & their convergence. And an adjustment was needed for just flying a fighter optimised more for the higher-altitude battles over the English channel and occupied France and it took them a month or so to really get accustomed to how to fight the German 109's in Spitfires. Plus; these Mk V's were second-hand and obsolescent against the latest 109's fielded by the Luftwaffe anyway.

However; the Soviets in both the VVS and PVO held the later delivered Mk IX Spitfire's in very high esteem. These Mk IX's were always operated from higher quality Soviet airfields than those suffered by the Mk V's in the Kuban battles. The Soviets didn't just appreciate the MK IX's strong all-round performance and agility, they also liked it's acceptable reliability & ease of maintenance and it's ergonomics and operating range. The Mk IX Spitfire was definitely as popular with it's Soviet pilots as it was with it's British Empire and USAAF pilots.

 

hope of interest.  One point, it was harder for Soviet correspondents and photographers to get to PVO units which were not in the frontline, and so photos are quite rare,  I've only seen a handful of shots of VVS Spitfire IX's

 

HTH

T

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...