Sgt.Squarehead Posted April 10, 2018 Share Posted April 10, 2018 To me the Lego release looks slightly more detailed.....It definitely has a more interesting surface texture and the figures are much more appealing. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Caerbannog Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 On 7.4.2018 at 18:04, spruecutter96 said: Just to state the very obvious ("Build-and-play model kit" and "6+"), there are no prizes for guessing the section of the market these kits are aimed at. Revell had to match the quality of the kits to the people that were going to be buidling them. This will leave experienced, adult modellers feeling somewhat cheated and I can very much see why... Mind you, if these are priced at the (very high) levels I would expect, all bets might be off. Please don't read this post as snide or patronising - its certainly not intended to be read like that. Cheers. Chris. I just do not agree with the idea that build-and-play must be void of detail and out of proportion. There should be away to please both ends - the kids and the "real modellers". Hmmm.... in fact these Build-and-play remind me of the old Kenner action vehicles which sometimes had very odd shapes (and yes - we as kids noticed this too of course, but there was no alternative). Looking at the now Hasbro vehicles these have become a lot better IMHO. The new Solo vehicles are not to my taste anyway but looking at the 1:144 Bandai Falcon I maybe will be picking one up. Looking at the Revell kits I will surely pass. Again (like I passed Revells The Last Jedi and Rougue Squadron Kits). If Revell has to pay about 1.000.000 USD to Disney for licene of SW (and others) I cannot understand that they put more effords into the brand. They can do nice kits (only have to chnge the odd scales), and I am sure these would sell fair enough. Rant over :-( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheVoidDragon Posted April 13, 2018 Share Posted April 13, 2018 4 hours ago, Caerbannog said: I just do not agree with the idea that build-and-play must be void of detail and out of proportion. There should be away to please both ends - the kids and the "real modellers". Hmmm.... in fact these Build-and-play remind me of the old Kenner action vehicles which sometimes had very odd shapes (and yes - we as kids noticed this too of course, but there was no alternative). Looking at the now Hasbro vehicles these have become a lot better IMHO. The new Solo vehicles are not to my taste anyway but looking at the 1:144 Bandai Falcon I maybe will be picking one up. Looking at the Revell kits I will surely pass. Again (like I passed Revells The Last Jedi and Rougue Squadron Kits). If Revell has to pay about 1.000.000 USD to Disney for licene of SW (and others) I cannot understand that they put more effords into the brand. They can do nice kits (only have to chnge the odd scales), and I am sure these would sell fair enough. Rant over :-( While i really doubt they paid anywhere near the same amount of money as for Star Wars, i also find it strange that they've licensed the Halo IP and so far have only made 2 "build-and-play" kits from that as well. They seem to really only be using them for the toy-like stuff even though there's so much, much more potential with those IPs. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gavingav1 Posted April 15, 2018 Author Share Posted April 15, 2018 (edited) A look at the opposition, apparently Bandai describe the between the mandibles thing as a shuttle craft Edited April 15, 2018 by gavingav1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chillitt Posted April 15, 2018 Share Posted April 15, 2018 Everyone in Hollywood gets a nose job, now its the Falcons turn. 1 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarkas Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 (edited) On 09/04/2018 at 5:49 PM, VMA131Marine said: The Enterprise had inertial dampers: although they never seemed to work when the ship was under attack. There were those folding restraints (or whatever) on the bridge seats of the refitted Enterprise in ST:TMP. We saw them used (and work) in the wormhole sequence, but maybe that shorted them out or something, because I don't remember seeing them after that or in any of the subsequent films. And, of course, we know the real reason why the E had no seat belts or equivalent before that: "Word of God" from the producers was that if they'd had seat belts, the actors couldn't fall all over the bridge! Edited April 17, 2018 by Tarkas Text was repeated 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thud4444 Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 On 4/15/2018 at 3:39 PM, gavingav said: A look at the opposition, apparently Bandai describe the between the mandibles thing as a shuttle craft ???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rwa66 Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 The falcon looks interesting, wonder if it will come with landing legs like the other 1-144 ones. When is this due for release? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now