Simon Cornes Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 For RFC types I am thinking that heavy black EZee Line is the best bet. Would I then use fine EZee Line for German airforce machines as they didn't use aero-section? I see that Paul of Modelling Tools now has EZee Line back in stock but if you can't get EZee Line, what is the best alternative? I notice that WNW also mention several different diameters of rigging depending on what its used for. Any suggestions on alternative sources/types? Thanks Simon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courageous Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 A 1/72 Triplane I built recently, I used the smallest mono-filament fishing line...worked well for me. Stuart 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beardie Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 Simon I think that the heavy EZline(I have some and never use it) is too heavy and the thickness too inconsistent to represent the aerodynamic RFC rigging. Wingnuts themselves recommend the Prym knitting in elastic for aerodynamic rigging and you can get it at any knitting shop or ebay for very little money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hacker Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 just bought some EZline myself recently. Got it for 1/72 and 1/32 with the thoughts that 1/48 if l need it l can use either or depending on the subject, size and what would look appropriate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandy Posted October 30, 2017 Share Posted October 30, 2017 What scale are you going to be working in? For 1:72 I use 1.5 or 2lb test monofilament fishing line. You can't see whether it's RAF section or not in that scale anyway. Ian 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Simon Cornes Posted October 31, 2017 Author Share Posted October 31, 2017 1/32nd. I imagine that for 1/72nd monofilament is best but for larger models I'm afraid it doesn't really work - in my mind anyway. What amazes me is how thin EZee Line goes when you stretch it a bit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhaselden Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 On 10/28/2017 at 9:29 AM, Beardie said: Simon I think that the heavy EZline(I have some and never use it) is too heavy and the thickness too inconsistent to represent the aerodynamic RFC rigging. Wingnuts themselves recommend the Prym knitting in elastic for aerodynamic rigging and you can get it at any knitting shop or ebay for very little money. Thanks for that recommendation Beardie. Do you think Prym would also work on 1/48 kits? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beardie Posted October 31, 2017 Share Posted October 31, 2017 I think it would work but I would recommed that it be streched quite a bit during installation to make it thinner. It seems a fair bit more consistent in cross section that EZline but is heavier. It is a real shame that it only comes in white though. Grey would be perfect. I wonder if it can be died. Anyone know any way you could dye lycra? For 1/48 scale perhaps Uschi Van der Rostens' rigging thread would be better as I gather that it is very fine although I have never seen any in the flesh to say from personal experience. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McNab Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 The Uschi rigging is extremely fine - at least the two types I have. .005 and .003 inch. Actually too fine for me in 1/32 or 1/35.... plus the eyes aren't quite as sharp as they once were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bear Paw Posted June 1, 2018 Share Posted June 1, 2018 I use the Uschi line for 1/72 scale aircraft rigging it is very thin, and I agree it is too fine for the rigging of 1/32 aircraft. The ezee line is controllable with regard to thickness through stretching although it can get a bit tense hoping the super glue holds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Coombs Posted June 5, 2018 Share Posted June 5, 2018 I've been using some Infini lycra thread with some success. It comes in various thicknesses (20 denier, 40 denier, and so on), and is marketed as rigging material for model ships, not that that precludes any other uses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brotrob Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 On 01/06/2018 at 23:27, Bear Paw said: I use the Uschi line for 1/72 scale aircraft rigging it is very thin, and I agree it is too fine for the rigging of 1/32 aircraft. The ezee line is controllable with regard to thickness through stretching although it can get a bit tense hoping the super glue holds. Interesting. I just bought the Uschi line, and find that its cross-section is flat. Depending on the angle you look at it, it varies in diameter. Worse, if there is the lightest twist in the fixed line, you can see that it has a flat cross-section from any angle. Did you find a way to overcome this apparent challenge? BTW: I am also suspicious that the Uschi line will lose its elasticity over time and start sagging. I already found that it reacts badly with certain types of paint when brought into contact with it, occasionally. Therefore, I decided to stick with 0,1mm black or transparent fishing line for the moment... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seawinder Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 I have always used monofilament fishing line (tippet material is what it's called on the label) in various sizes for my 1/48 builds -- usually .004 or .006 inches diameter, AKA 2.2 lb. or 4.9 lb. test. One thing I don't think has been mentioned so far is the different implications for installation between monofilaments and any of the elastic lines, including EZ and Uschi. The elastics will obviously tension themselves and therefore don't require any through holes to be drilled. Monofiliaments, OTOH, do require tensioning weight to be applied before they are secured, which generally involves a partial hole in the bottom of the upper wing and a through hole in the lower wing, which will have to be filled and smoothed after the line has been secured and trimmed. That of course implies that one isn't trying to secure the lines to metal turnbuckles, a can of worms I haven't yet had the courage to open. The upside of using monofilament, besides its consistency of diameter, is its strength: it will actually strengthen the overall structure in the same way the flying and landing wires do for the real plane. p.s. I've recently procured some Uschi line (both sizes), but haven't had a chance to try it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Army_Air_Force Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 I've been using stainless steel or Ni-Chrome 0.1mm wire for my rigging. Stretched slightly to help straighten it off the roll, and attached with PVA glue. I think it was about £1.50 inc shipping for 10 metres from Ebay. I used it on this Sea King for the rigging to hold the stowed blades. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artie Posted June 21, 2018 Share Posted June 21, 2018 I always use electric guitar string....Fender, 0,08, steel.....works fine for me.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brotrob Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 On 28/10/2017 at 12:39, Courageous said: I used the smallest mono-filament fishing line...worked well for me. Stuart Hi Stuart, Your Tripe looks excellent, especially the rigging looks very realistic. Do you remember the diameter of the fishing line you used? Was it 0,1 mm (0.039 inch) by any chance? Or did you manage to find an even thinner fishing line? Rob 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seawinder Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 6 hours ago, Brotrob said: Hi Stuart, Your Tripe looks excellent, especially the rigging looks very realistic. Do you remember the diameter of the fishing line you used? Was it 0,1 mm (0.039 inch) by any chance? Or did you manage to find an even thinner fishing line? Rob Not to be pedantic, but .1 mm is roughly .0039 inch, which in 1/72 scales to a little over .28 inches. I think at least some 1/72 builders use invisible mending thread, another, thinner nylon monofilament that (I think) is about .002 inches, or 1/72 scale .14 inches diameter. I'm not finding any fishing tippet line smaller than .003 inch diameter, which apparently is generally called 8X size, or 1.4 lb. test. If you google tippet line, you'll find any number of brands available at sporting goods outlets -- Orvis, Rio and Cortland (Precision) are quite prevalent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Courageous Posted June 22, 2018 Share Posted June 22, 2018 10 hours ago, Brotrob said: Was it 0,1 mm (0.039 inch) by any chance? Or did you manage to find an even thinner fishing line? Drennen Specimen Mono, 2lb/ 0.91kg...0.14mm was used on the Tripe. I have got a spool of Uschi thread to try on a future build. Stuart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUB-SAM Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 I recommend using corrosion resistant wires such as nichrome or marine grade stainless. The problem with lycra, fishing line or other polymers will be degradation in UV light over time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janneman36 Posted June 28, 2018 Share Posted June 28, 2018 My fishing line is uv resistant and very stretchy and it almosts behaves like the ez stuff. I am not afraid too touch it and stretch it a little...and it is a 0,006 line.. Cheers, Jan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now