nsmekanik Posted October 1, 2017 Share Posted October 1, 2017 (edited) I'll just leave this here Hannants ....... Edited October 1, 2017 by nsmekanik 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Hugo Posted October 1, 2017 Share Posted October 1, 2017 No, I would rather have a Tempest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Britman Posted October 1, 2017 Share Posted October 1, 2017 Misprint? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie @ Sovereign Hobbies Posted October 1, 2017 Share Posted October 1, 2017 I find it hard to believe Top Notch Masks would know about a forthcoming Airfix release before Airfix themselves went public with it. Thus, the logical conclusion is a misprint / error somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duncan B Posted October 1, 2017 Share Posted October 1, 2017 Why not ask Top Notch Masks? Duncan B 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ben_m Posted October 1, 2017 Share Posted October 1, 2017 http://topnotchmasks.com/2017/04/21/camaflague-mask-sets/hawker-typhoon/ Interesting spelling. Looks like they just scale their artwork to all common scales (1/72, 1:48, 1:32, 1:24). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsmekanik Posted October 2, 2017 Author Share Posted October 2, 2017 I'm Assuming it's a misprint and more likely for the Hasegawa kit, still though it would be a nice addition to the Airfix lineup I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorby Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 A 1/48 Typhoon in the Airfix lineup would make sense, so perhaps it may be likely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wyverns4 Posted October 2, 2017 Share Posted October 2, 2017 Not to mention that there is an extant airframe for lidar work... But, most likely, a typo for Hasegawa/Eduard Christian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k5054nz Posted October 3, 2017 Share Posted October 3, 2017 (edited) And MN235 has already been LIDAR/3D-scanned, albeit for an airworthy restoration project, so we know it's possible Edited October 3, 2017 by k5054nz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GordonM Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 Logically it could be a misprint of scale/manufacturer, but assuming it's a mistake it could also be an embargo date been mistaken? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Work In Progress Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 20 hours ago, k5054nz said: And MN235 has already been LIDAR/3D-scanned, albeit for an airworthy restoration project, so we know it's possible Hope they took proper account of all the non-Typhoon bodgery that's fitted to MN235 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
k5054nz Posted October 4, 2017 Share Posted October 4, 2017 I'd rather a flying Typhoon with non-Typhoon bodgery than none flying at all! The team doing it are well-informed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now