Jump to content

Airfix Skyraider - Resuming work after about 20 years


Recommended Posts

It's a while since I've done any serious work on historical model subjects.  For the past decade or so I've concentrated mainly on wargame figures, but my interests tend to go in circles (or perhaps downward spirals), and I'm redirecting my focus back to aircraft.  Up until the mid to late 90s, my scale of choice was 1:72, but then I switched to 1:48, and I embraced all the aftermarket stuff with as much enthusiasm as anyone, but I do miss the days before then, when all your extra detail had to be scratchbuilt.  So I've dusted off (literally - it was covered in it!) an Airfix 1:72 Skyraider that I put quite a bit of effort into back in the day, but never finished.  Here it is as it now, having waited patiently for so long for work to resume.

JZhRMMY.jpg

 

18cr484.jpg

 

qOSfuMx.jpg

 

6fQ3v4v.jpg

 

9jL9ywf.jpg

 

eIUs25M.jpg

 

2FzMXb4.jpg

 

lJ7Hb7I.jpg

 

ECLTyxy.jpg

 

XUMNm6L.jpg

 

It seems the rudder has gone AWOL, so i'll need to scratchbuild a new one.  That's probably where I'll start, then detail and mount the engine.  Still a lot to do, but I'm looking forward to it!

  • Like 29
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it's certainly nice to see a few of you are interested! :smile:

 

Here's the first progress report.  As promised, I've replaced the missing rudder with a scratchbuilt one.  Also done some work on the ailerons and flaps to get them to fit better.  They still need a few details, including the prominent flap hinges under the wings.  I've also put some work into reshaping the propeller blades, but more on that next time.  Here's the new rudder:

Ey28tVx.jpg

 

NlBeeog.jpg

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great rudder build. I am always impressed by the skill shown in scratch building on this site. Makes my woeful efforts look puny in comparison. Looks like you did some considerably nice detail work prior to letting this kit "rest" for a while. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

Nice work updating this old Airfix offering! Looking forward to more of the same!

Will follow along as well if you don't mind?

 

  Roger

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great work, pity I only saw this thread this morning as I'm sure I have an Airfix Spad fuselage you could have had the rudder from. I have two Aeroclub AEW's in the pipeline. Will watch closely for tips.

cheers

Ian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Hamden said:

 

 

Nice work updating this old Airfix offering! Looking forward to more of the same!

Will follow along as well if you don't mind?

 

  Roger

Of course I don't mind, Roger, the more the merrier!

 

14 hours ago, Radar said:

Great work, pity I only saw this thread this morning as I'm sure I have an Airfix Spad fuselage you could have had the rudder from. I have two Aeroclub AEW's in the pipeline. Will watch closely for tips.

cheers

Ian

No worries, Ian, I actually had a spare Airfix fuselage myself, but I decided it would be just as easy to scratchbuild a new rudder as to make a decent one from the kit part.

Edited by Possibly Apocryphal
typo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today's update:  I've done most of the detailing now on the upper fuselage.  Added an extra armour plate from 5 thou plastic card, added the armour bolts and step plus the lateral plates above the upper exhaust.  I assume they're to shield the glowing exhaust outlets from the pilot's view so as not to ruin is night vision.  Also added the rear bank of engine cylinders on a spacer and added the exhaust pipes from 1mm plastic rod.  And finally, added the blade aerial just behind the cockpit.

 

lhscTca.jpg

 

hKSrECe.jpg

 

With the engine cowling in place (not glued on yet), it's starting to look quite Skyraidery.

Gt42bnF.jpg

 

oubNfmj.jpg

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a thing.  I went through my old magazines that I still had stored in moving boxes in my garage from when I moved house a couple of years ago.  I couldn't find my copy of the Skyraider in Detail & Scale (must have found its way into a box that I marked wrongly when I packed it), so I was after a set of scale drawings, and I was pretty sure I had what I needed somewhere.  Sure enough, Scale Aviation Modeller International from October '98 had just what I was looking for - a lovely set of drawings by Richard Caruana, in 1:72. 

 

DItFZgv.jpg

 

Well that what they would have you believe anyway.  Because, this: (!)

 

MVCtldG.jpg

 

That's a huge discrepancy!  So the first thing I did was check the scale.  2 metres in 1:72 is 27.78mm

 

lLXeHnT.jpg

 

No problem there, that's bang on.  But I was still sure the Aifix kit wasn't that far off.  Next step is check the wingspan, because that's nearly always the least ambiguous dimension.  According to Squadron/Signal's A-1 Skyraider Walkaround it's 50 ft 1/4 in (15.2m).  Their conversion isn't really precise, it's actually 15.246m, but let's not get pedantic.  In 1:72 that's 211.75mm.  And the wingspan of the Airfix kit is.........................a fraction under 210.  So it's basically correct, and the drawings somehow got reproduced in an incorrectly large scale.  Just goes to show, you always need to verify anything that doesn't seem right (and probably a lot of things that do seem right as well.)

 

 

Edited by Possibly Apocryphal
  • Like 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Possibly Apocryphal said:

Here's a thing.  I went through my old magazines that I still had stored in moving boxes in my garage from when I moved house a couple of years ago.  I couldn't find my copy of the Skyraider in Detail & Scale (must have found its way into a box that I marked wrongly when I packed it), so I was after a set of scale drawings, and I was pretty sure I had what I needed somewhere.  Sure enough, Scale Aviation Modeller International from October '98 had just what I was looking for - a lovely set of drawings by Richard Caruana, in 1:72. 

 

 

 

Well that what they would have you believe anyway.  Because, this: (!)

 

 

 

That's a huge discrepancy!  So the first thing I did was check the scale.  2 metres in 1:72 is 27.78mm

 

 

 

No problem there, that's bang on.  But I was still sure the Aifix kit wasn't that far off.  Next step is check the wingspan, because that's nearly always the least ambiguous dimension.  According to Squadron/Signal's A-1 Skyraider Walkaround it's 50 ft 1/4 in (15.2m).  Their conversion isn't really precise, it's actually 15.246m, but let's not get pedantic.  In 1:72 that's 211.75mm.  And the wingspan of the Airfix kit is.........................a fraction under 210.  So it's basically correct, and the drawings somehow got reproduced in an incorrectly large scale.  Just goes to show, you always need to verify anything that doesn't seem right (and probably a lot of things that do seem right as well.)

 

 

 

I'd be wary of anything by Caruana, without something to check against.

 

if you can't find your Detail and scale, the Skyraider volume is scanned here

http://www.boxartden.com/gallery/index.php/Profiles/Detail-Scale/67-Douglas-AD

 

note most of the others are, plus plenty of other OOP references.

 

very  neat work  going one here

cheers

T

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This continues to impress! A good job you rumbled those dodgy plans before you started t try and "correct" the kit.

 

Martian

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, a bit more progress.  I've added a bit of detail to the engine.  I didn't want to go mad with it, since it won't be too visible, but I think I've done enough to make it look ok.

 

zGIXcAz.jpg

 

Now, the propeller.  Well there's good news and bad news.  The good news is, it has the right number of blades (not that that's a huge surprise, Airfix rarely made errors of that magnitude, although if you ever build their SM.79 I suggest you do a quick audit of the engine cylinders).  But wait, there's more!  They got the diameter just right as well.  But that's where the good news ends.  The shape of the blades is simply hilarious.  But when I examined them, I decided there didn't seem to be anywhere where anything was undersized, so I could get them pretty close to correct by carving and sanding the excess materiel away.  As it turns out, they ended up looking pretty close to how they should, although the tips might be a little too tapered, and should perhaps be a little more square.  Here's an unmodified one along with my corrected prop.

 

Twt67cb.jpg

 

And all put together, it looks like this:

zCoh9sc.jpg

 

There are still a couple of sink holes that need filling, but that's a simple task.

  • Like 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...