jetboy Posted June 11, 2016 Share Posted June 11, 2016 heres a link to the article... http://sputniknews.com/politics/20160611/1041185729/russia-hypersonic-glider.html#ixzz4BIi21J9O and heres a pic.... cheers don..,im sure this is something from the 50,s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmatthewbacon Posted June 11, 2016 Share Posted June 11, 2016 50s? Check out the Sanger-Bredt Silbervogel.. bestest, M. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetboy Posted June 11, 2016 Author Share Posted June 11, 2016 50s? Check out the Sanger-Bredt Silbervogel.. bestest, M. heres mine......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hacker Posted June 11, 2016 Share Posted June 11, 2016 Odds are the US already has them in service which would explain those contrails of an unknown aircraft. Probably too they have an counter defense again similar aircraft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmatthewbacon Posted June 11, 2016 Share Posted June 11, 2016 (edited) The height these things (are supposed to) fly, there's no likelihood of contrails... ...and cool as that model is, it's not a silbervogel... a big Dynasoar, maybe.... bestest, M. [There's so much that's wrong in that article, it's not even worth starting to critique it... It's essentially a straight re-write of an Aviation Leak story from 1954... ;-P] Edited June 11, 2016 by cmatthewbacon 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBaron Posted June 11, 2016 Share Posted June 11, 2016 The height these things (are supposed to) fly, there's no likelihood of contrails] You are right. It is the black helicopters that are spraying the contrails. The hypersonic craft are the ones used to ferry our lizard overlords between the UN General Assembly and their base at the North Pole. This is old news. If you remove the IR filter from a webcam and attach it to a cheap telescope, this is enough to allow you to see both kinds of craft, though at these longer wavelengths the resolution is quite poor, especially if there is a lot of moisture in the atmosphere. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PLC1966 Posted June 11, 2016 Share Posted June 11, 2016 Where does the tinfoil hat come into this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetboy Posted June 11, 2016 Author Share Posted June 11, 2016 grandaddy of em all....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBaron Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 Where does the tinfoil hat come into this. *Humouring rumours* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubster72 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 Complete rubbish! An ICBM travels at greater than hypersonic speeds; roughly 14000 kph after burnout.That increases as it descends toward the earth. Also the faster an object travels, the less manoeuvrable it becomes. Aircraft at high speed have a much greater turning circle. A hypersonic aircraft could never be highly manoeuvrable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetboy Posted June 12, 2016 Author Share Posted June 12, 2016 Complete rubbish! An ICBM travels at greater than hypersonic speeds; roughly 14000 kph after burnout.That increases as it descends toward the earth. Also the faster an object travels, the less manoeuvrable it becomes. Aircraft at high speed have a much greater turning circle. A hypersonic aircraft could never be highly manoeuvrable. yes but thats only the physic,s you have been taught......the world is far stranger than we can imagine.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dubster72 Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 yes but thats only the physic,s you have been taught......the world is far stranger than we can imagine.... So you're effectively discounting all the laws of physics? Not to mention actual measured examples that prove said physical realities? The world is certainly stranger than I imagined since reading your post! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jetboy Posted June 12, 2016 Author Share Posted June 12, 2016 So you're effectively discounting all the laws of physics? Not to mention actual measured examples that prove said physical realities? The world is certainly stranger than I imagined since reading your post! YES... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Norman Posted June 12, 2016 Share Posted June 12, 2016 L.O.L Classic stuff Don.....love it 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now