perdu Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 I picked up one of these last week for less than twenty pounds, should I worry that I wasted my money or gloat at my financial acumen? I have seen references to intake dimensions and other comments about the upper engine and wing root detail, I'm wondering if I've landed myself with a huge problem or just a reasonable bit of Milliputtery to engage myself when I finally get round to it Advice and comment would be very welcome folks, thanks I'm aware that the decal sheet is a little 'unusual', dealing with which isn't a worry to me I have a huge stash of Almarks roundels And a printer beside me 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robvulcan Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 Go for it, I think it's a great Kit not sure about the inaccuracies but looks like a nimrod to me. I remember something to about the internal fuselage parta you need to watch for affecting th final assembly of the fuselage and wings but not sure what it's been a while now 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhantomBigStu Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 got yourself a bargain 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ascoteer Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 (edited) Hi Bill. The Airfix Nimbat isn't bad but the intakes are all wrong and the thrust reverser vents are in the wrong place and poorly rendered.The canopy is poor, as is the dorsal fin. I'd use the Alley-Cat resin parts I think it was Heritage as did white metal u/c, and there is also a resin nosewhel bay out there.. Edited July 30, 2015 by Ascoteer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfqweofekwpeweiop4 Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 I built one for somebody. I've no idea about inaccuracies but the decals were awful, I'd recommend aftermarket decals. thanks Mike 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tipper Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 hi Perdu! The decal sheet is rubbish, bin it! nose landing gear bay is completely devoid of detail, but i guess you've already seen that. careful aligning the upper & lower main wing halves - the opening for the landing lights(?) on the wing roots didn't align on my build, had to ream them out and use micro crystal clear in place of the kit parts as a consequence. the doors stand proud of the fuselage, need to be sanded down. gaps on the main and tail wings to fuselage joins, rather large-ish in my case. that's all i remember. but don't be put off, it's nice and impressive when built. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fritag Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 Got a Nimrod at Elvington - I could take a trip out and get piccies if you need em? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
canberra kid Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 Go for it Perdu! Will you be doing a wip? If so let me know as I have one lined up for an ex Nimrod driver. John 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ascoteer Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 (edited) Got a Nimrod at Elvington - I could take a trip out and get piccies if you need em? I must take a trip up to Elvington - I haven't been there since Jetstream student days... Edited July 30, 2015 by Ascoteer 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dambuster Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 Whatever you do, don't build it with the flaps down.... Airfix only give an option for half the flaps to be lowered, completely missing those under the engine tailpipes. Otherwise, a bit of filing on the underside of the intakes to create a more squared off appearance, reshaping the searchlight and correcting the leading edge landing lights outboard of the engines are the easiest mods and help improve the appearance. If you attach the upperwings to the fuselage then glue the wing underside on you can remove the need to sand and fill the upperwing to fuselage join. Peter 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foghorn Leghorn Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 There's plenty of irksome areas, the thrust reverser cascades (in the wrong place and look nothing like the originals) nose light in the wrong position, plus the other stuff already mentioned above. But the same can be said of many kits I suppose. But hey, it's a nimrod and the only one on the market so I'm happy (got 3 of them to build) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xffw45343tg Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 There was a brilliant build on here many years back where the builder had a real one to compare it with. I think the conclusion was that the kit is good but the real thing is better... Nose light is too high iirc. I may have saved the link if you can't find it. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stever219 Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 The build on here was by Mattie B and was of R. 1 XW665 I think. There are differences between the R. 1s and the MR. variants, I.e. no weapons bay, but a lot of these were covered in the thread. Interestingly XV249 at Cosford is displayed with the outer flaps down and the inners up. Life imitating art perhaps? If you're doing an MR. 2 the SCP intake is the wrong size and the exhaust in the wrong place (both on the rear fuselage port side) but Alley Cat sorted out the former and the latter is a "cut 'n' shut job. The APU installation, starboard rear fuselage, is more appropriate for an MR. 2 IIRC. I've built the kit as a Mk. 2 without a lot of the mods and it's still quite impressive. One day I hope I'll get round to doing some more of them, and I've still got another three to build! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perdu Posted July 30, 2015 Author Share Posted July 30, 2015 Wow, talk about an enthusiastic and knowlegable response huh Thanks very much for this, so not a waste of dosh Lots of doable work to improve it and impressive afterwards Sounds like I got a bargain I haven't started doing the research yet, nor decided which variant I fancy but I lived for a few weeks in 8 Sqn's hangar during a scheme we were on one year whilst Kinloss was being resurfaced and there were a couple of white/grey Nimmys parked around the place making it look like a real airfield So I have a slight bias thataway, 'specially as they were white/grey the first time Nimrod won Fincastle and I do so like winners But Cosford is only a few minutes away, free to enter and has XV249 in pale fawn Not likely before the winter though, I'm measuring/drawing a Hansom Cab in 54mm now I have procured Dobbin to stand in its shafts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ascoteer Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 The APU installation, starboard rear fuselage, is more appropriate for an MR. 2 IIRC. All Nimrods, wheter MR1, MR2, R1 or AEW3 had the same APU. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ascoteer Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 XV249 started life as am MR but was converted into an R1 after the loss of XV666 in the Moray Firth. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xffw45343tg Posted July 30, 2015 Share Posted July 30, 2015 (edited) Mattie Bee's (amazing) Airfix Nimrod here. Build thread here. Edited July 30, 2015 by Kirk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dambuster Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 But Cosford is only a few minutes away, free to enter and has XV249 in pale fawn Fairly sure XV249 is non-descript grey... Reckon the odd flap setting is because of the way they chopped up the wing connections when it was moved into Cosford.... Peter 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nigel Bunker Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 I built an Airfix Nimrod. Compared with the other Nimrod by Formaplane (which I beat into submission) the Airfix kit was a delight to build.Even out of the box it looks good and impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fritag Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 (edited) Not likely before the winter though, I'm measuring/drawing a Hansom Cab in 54mm now I have procured Dobbin to stand in its shafts Not fair to keep us waiting that long now Bill. Mrs F cadged a few rides in the Nimrod out of Kinloss in the early 80's. Her recollection is of surprisingly good on board grub - and almost constant eating by the crew....... So don't forget to super-detail the galley....... Edited July 31, 2015 by Fritag 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
perdu Posted July 31, 2015 Author Share Posted July 31, 2015 Fairly sure XV249 is non-descript grey... Reckon the odd flap setting is because of the way they chopped up the wing connections when it was moved into Cosford.... Peter Of course it is Peter thanks for reminding me Only saw her a few weeks ago too, duh.... Thanks for the link to that build Kirk, lovely stuff Steve, I have to, simply have to build the Cab But Nimrod will be coming along shortly Detailing the interior may well be done with a thick black paint brush I'm still deciding whether to lay in large stocks of Milliput for the intakes or buy someone else's resin Autumn at least But there's Chinooks to build too And Buccaneers Cranberries Phantooms and going up and down VTOL fighters And Airfix are producing awesome Shackletons and Sea Kings And I am ever so old.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ascoteer Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 Mrs F cadged a few rides in the Nimrod out of Kinloss in the early 80's. Her recollection is of surprisingly good on board grub - and almost constant eating by the crew....... Ah yes, DCS! (Dairy Cream Sponge - staple diet of Nimrod crews) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stever219 Posted July 31, 2015 Share Posted July 31, 2015 Ascoteer, thanks for the APU comment. What I meant to trype was that the intake and/or exhaust on the fuselage side were different between the two marks. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now